<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/utility/FeedStylesheets/atom.xsl" media="screen"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en"><title type="html">Publications</title><subtitle type="html" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/atom.aspx</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/default.aspx" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/atom.aspx" /><generator uri="http://communityserver.org" version="3.1.20917.1142">Community Server</generator><updated>1990-01-04T00:00:00Z</updated><entry><title>Debate: To Nudge or Not to Nudge</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/02/18/debate-to-nudge-or-not-to-nudge.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/02/18/debate-to-nudge-or-not-to-nudge.aspx</id><published>2010-03-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2010-03-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Daniel M. Hausman and Brynn Welch&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;One of the hottest ideas in current policy debates is “libertarian paternalism,” the design of policies that push individuals toward better choices without limiting their liberty. In their recent book, Nudge, Richard Thaler and then Obama advisor (now head of the White House’s Office of Information and regulatory Affairs), Cass Sunstein, suggest several ways in which government agencies and private organizations might “nudge” individuals toward actions that are better&amp;nbsp; or them. They hope to promote libertarian paternalism as a promising foundation for bipartisanship—a way of maintaining our firm commitment to freedom of choice while also helping people make better decisions for themselves” (p. 14). They suggest “that libertarian paternalism offers a real Third Way—one that can break through some of the least tractable debates in contemporary democracies” (p. 252/255).&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; In this article, we address questions both about paternalism—what is it, and could there be a variety that does not limit freedom?—and about nudges—what are they, and should those who value freedom find them unobjectionable? We deny libertarian paternalism is both libertarian and paternalist and that it is as benign as Thaler and Sunstein maintain. We argue that some of their proposals constitute a istinctive variety of paternalism, whose libertarian credentials are dubious, even though their implementation would not be coercive4 and would not significantly limit freedom of choice. Our focus is on their concepts, not their policies.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; After a first section that clarifies what Thaler and Sunstein take libertarian paternalism to be, section II addresses the question of what constitutes paternalism. In our view, what makes some of the policies Thaler and Sunstein call “libertarian paternalism” paternalistic is that they push people to make choices that are good for themselves by taking advantage of imperfections in human decision-making abilities. Section III then addresses the broader question concerning what limits there ought to be on nudges—that is, the use of flaws in human judgment and choice to influence people’s behavior.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/122679969/abstract"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=811" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /><category term="social psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/social+psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="behavior" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/behavior/default.aspx" /><category term="leadership" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/leadership/default.aspx" /><category term="cognition" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/cognition/default.aspx" /><category term="practical wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/practical+wisdom/default.aspx" /><category term="virtue" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/virtue/default.aspx" /><category term="PHILOSOPHY" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/PHILOSOPHY/default.aspx" /><category term="ethics" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/ethics/default.aspx" /><category term="organizational behavior" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/organizational+behavior/default.aspx" /><category term="free will" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/free+will/default.aspx" /><category term="political science" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/political+science/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Wisdom: From Philosophy to Neuroscience</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/03/01/wisdom-from-philosophy-to-neuroscience.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/03/01/wisdom-from-philosophy-to-neuroscience.aspx</id><published>2010-03-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2010-03-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Stephen S. Hall&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;A compelling investigation into one of our most coveted and cherished
ideals, and the efforts of modern science to penetrate the mysterious
nature of this timeless virtue. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
We all recognize wisdom, but defining it is more elusive. In this
fascinating journey from philosophy to science, Stephen S. Hall gives
us a dramatic history of wisdom, from its sudden emergence in four
different locations (Greece, China, Israel, and India) in the fifth
century B.C. to its modern manifestations in education, politics, and
the workplace. We learn how wisdom became the provenance of philosophy
and religion through its embodiment in individuals such as Buddha,
Confucius, and Jesus; how it has consistently been a catalyst for
social change; and how revelatory work in the last fifty years by
psychologists, economists, and neuroscientists has begun to shed light
on the biology of cognitive traits long associated with wisdom — and,
in doing so, begun to suggest how we might cultivate it. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Hall explores the neural mechanisms for wise decision making; the
conflict between the emotional and cognitive parts of the brain; the
development of compassion, humility, and empathy; the effect of
adversity and the impact of early-life stress on the development of
wisdom; and how we can learn to optimize our future choices and future
selves. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Hall&amp;#39;s bracing exploration of the science of wisdom allows us to see
this ancient virtue with fresh eyes, yet also makes clear that despite
modern science&amp;#39;s most powerful efforts, wisdom continues to elude easy
understanding.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Read &lt;a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=dztHPgAACAAJ&amp;amp;dq=wisdom+from+philosophy+to+neuroscience&amp;amp;cd=1"&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Photo from &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/creativecommons/"&gt;Flickr Creative Commons&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=826" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="culture" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/culture/default.aspx" /><category term="Wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/Wisdom/default.aspx" /><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /><category term="social psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/social+psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="behavior" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/behavior/default.aspx" /><category term="leadership" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/leadership/default.aspx" /><category term="wisdom-related knowledge" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/wisdom-related+knowledge/default.aspx" /><category term="practical wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/practical+wisdom/default.aspx" /><category term="virtue" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/virtue/default.aspx" /><category term="neuroscience" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/neuroscience/default.aspx" /><category term="PHILOSOPHY" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/PHILOSOPHY/default.aspx" /><category term="ethics" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/ethics/default.aspx" /><category term="organizational behavior" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/organizational+behavior/default.aspx" /><category term="knowledge" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/knowledge/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>An open letter to President Obama.</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/03/05/an-open-letter-to-president-obama.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/03/05/an-open-letter-to-president-obama.aspx</id><published>2010-03-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2010-03-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div id="knol-article-top"&gt;
&lt;div class="knol-inline-editor knol-content-ltr"&gt;&lt;h1 id="knol-title" class="knol-title"&gt;Dear
Mr. President; You have the opportunity to bring real change not only
to Washington and the entire country ; you have an opportunity to
change the world for ever.&lt;/h1&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="knol-inline-editor knol-content-ltr"&gt;&lt;h2 id="knol-subtitle" class="knol-subtitle"&gt;Will someone with access to Preident Obama please bring this to his attention.&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="knol-clearer-div"&gt; &lt;/div&gt;

&lt;div&gt; &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="knol-inline-editor knol-content-ltr"&gt;&lt;h2 id="knol-abstract" class="knol-abstract"&gt;Mr.
President, you have the power; please let me show you how to use it to
really fix much of the mess in the world. If you want to bring real
positive change across the board in one stroke, you will have to
consider making emotional intelligence education a compulsory subject
form Pre-K to the post graduate level and beyond.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mr. President you have the opportunity to become the greatest Education President ever.&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;h4 style="line-height:normal;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Times New Roman,serif;"&gt;Commission
after commission has been set up to fix the mess in education. Each
time the experts are called to find the solutions to the education mess
they look to improve main stream education. No one is thinking of
fixing emotional intelligence education. It is below the radar screen
and even those who have some clue to this problem are not sure how to
handle this emotional intelligence education crisis. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;In fact
the $670,000,000.00 fund that your current central administration is
giving out to the states to come up with innovations in education, I am
sure each one of them will again send back proposals of how to teach
math and science better and will again miss the central issue of the
real mess in education; the lack of emotional intelligence education.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h4&gt; &lt;a name="When_we_try_to_understand_and_fix_the_mess_in_education_we_keep_going_back_to_trying_to_improve_how_we_teach_subjects_like_math_" class=""&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;h4 style="line-height:normal;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Times New Roman,serif;"&gt;When
we try to understand and fix the mess in education we keep going back
to trying to improve how we teach subjects like math and science.
Actually our math and science education is well set and the mess lies
elsewhere. It is due to lack of even a single subject that teaches
emotional intelligence. As emotional intelligence itself is still
fuzzy, it is neglected by mainstream education even though its
importance is now well recognized by main stream science.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/h4&gt; &lt;a name="It_is_understandable_that_the_Holy_Grail_of_education(2C)_self_mastery_and_wisdom_is_not_even_perused_by_main_stream_education(2" class=""&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;h4 style="line-height:normal;margin-bottom:0pt;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Times New Roman,serif;"&gt;It
is understandable that the Holy Grail of education, self mastery and
wisdom is not even perused by main stream education. The reason is that
we do not have precise and clear definitions of the self, wisdom and
even the mind and brain. How can we even attempt to fix something we do
not even know?&amp;nbsp; I have figured out these issues and you can examine my
work by googling, &amp;#39;wisdom by sajid khan&amp;#39;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h4&gt;&lt;a name="I_have_a_very_clear_idea_of_how_to_create_a_new_subject_that_teaches_emotional_intelligence(2E)_Mr(2E)_President_you_have_a_chan" class=""&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;h4 style="line-height:normal;margin-bottom:0pt;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Times New Roman,serif;"&gt;I
have a very clear idea of how to create a new subject that teaches
emotional intelligence. Mr. President you have a chance to enact a new
law calling for the teaching of a compulsory subject that teaches
emotional intelligence. I will help you write this law.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h4&gt; &lt;a name="One_reason_why_even_those_who_try_to_teach_emotional_intelligence_at_the_school_level_do_not_have_much_success_is_because_while_" class=""&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;h4 style="line-height:normal;margin-bottom:0pt;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Times New Roman,serif;"&gt;One
reason why even those who try to teach emotional intelligence at the
school level do not have much success is because while math and science
education starts at age 3/4/5. Emotional intelligence education starts
at conception or at least from the mid part of pregnancy. And by the
time the child is 6 years old his emotional intelligence education is
well set. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;As the most important part of emotional
intelligence education takes place by the age of six years it is
essential that we make it compulsory for parents to learn to prepare
the mothers womb even before conception and to learn how to create the
right learning environment for the fetus and later for the child to get
the right emotional intelligence education. Unless we take this issue
seriously emotionally unstable and unprepared brains will keep entering
the classroom en mass and we will continue to be confused of how to
handle such students.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h4&gt; &lt;a name="I_am_very_hopeful_that_you_will_look_into_my_proposal_to_create_a_new_compulsory_subject_that_teaches_emotional_intelligence(2E)" class=""&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;h4 style="line-height:normal;margin-bottom:0pt;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Times New Roman,serif;"&gt;I
am very hopeful that you will look into my proposal to create a new
compulsory subject that teaches emotional intelligence. After all Mr.
President you are asking for innovative proposals and not the same old
same old proposals to fix regular education. Especially as your own
life has been a shining example of trail blazing leadership. And I am
sure you will do all you can to improve education not only for the
whole United States and also for the whole world. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h4&gt;&lt;div id="refHTML"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=829" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>sajidkhan</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/sajidkhan.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>Wisdom is a tree.</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/03/05/wisdom-is-a-tree.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/03/05/wisdom-is-a-tree.aspx</id><published>2010-03-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2010-03-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Wisdom
is a tree. The attributes of wisdom are its fruit. As man knows the
attributes of wisdom man tries to teach these attributes. It is very
difficult and frustrating to cultivate these attributes because it is
the same as trying to produce bananas without the banana tree.
Cultivate the tree and the bananas will emerge automatically.&lt;span&gt;One
must be fully trained to play the game of life to the best of one’s
fully developed potential. While the world is focused on researching
and refining ways of how to develop one’s regular intelligence
potential one’s other equally important emotional intelligence
potential is more or less neglected. And as result most people live
their lives struggling with a partially developed emotional
intelligence potential. By the time experience grinds down this gap in
potential they are ready to retire having missed out on playing the
game of life as it is supposed to be played in full prime of life.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span&gt;Most
people are unaware that the means to a maximum ability to play the game
of life lies in getting the right knowledge to develop one’s brain to
the super mature level. And main stream science/education does not help
either. Recently there was an article in the NY Times about some
scientist having proved in one more way that relaxation helps the brain
become more physically healthy. This is a more or less well established
fact, yet the scientist says, “Relaxation may help …” Just imagine this
well established fact yet the scientist states it with a ‘may’.
Unfortunately it is not his mistake it is the culture of science that
once some new insight emerges then instead of taking advantage of it
the scientist asks the next question, ‘What next?’. It is like
expanding the horizon and instead of cultivating the newly discovered
field the gaze shifts to the new horizon. It is a perpetual quest to
expand the horizons of science for its own sake.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span&gt;There
is a treasure trove of knowledge right under our chin which we can use
to develop the science of emotional intelligence, which at the super
mature mind/brain level is the science of wisdom, even the science of
universal common sense (though many a times group common sense can be
prejudiced and so we can say ‘the science of universal common sense’).&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span&gt;Man
since ancient times did figure out that wisdom is the key to man’s
emancipation and a good virtuous life. However man tried to define and
figure out wisdom and as we did not succeed we decided to list all the
attributes of wisdom. So the quest became, ‘How to teach the attributes
of wisdom’. Now the very nature of wisdom is such that wisdom can be
described as a tree where its attributes are the fruit of the wisdom
tree. No wonder it is so very difficult and almost impossible to
cultivate the attributes of wisdom like selflessness and humbleness;
because it is the same as trying to grow my favorite fruit the mango
with out growing the mango tree. No wonder main stream education gave
up trying to teach wisdom.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span&gt;Also
just like life needs oxygen wisdom needs a nurturing environment to
grow into a wisdom tree and sprout out automatically all its attributes
of selfless love and grace etc. So the wisdom tree needs to get its
roots nurtured from the womb onwards.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span&gt;As
some parents will always be inadequate to provide this nurturing
environment and will only sprout the tree of ignorance we can develop
ways to detect the absence of the wisdom tree and take steps to develop
pre-K to 12 and beyond wisdom education. Which means making the brain
squeaky clean; by removing of all traces of the tree of ignorance.
Absence of the ignorance tree is the oxygen for the wisdom tree to
sprout automatically.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span&gt;We
must establish a process where effective and urgently required/needed
new knowledge contained in knols must be promoted in every possible
manner. Consider this latest knol, &amp;#39;Wisdom is a tree&amp;#39;. How can I claim
that this contains urgently required knowledge. Just take the state of
the world today. Lets take the conflict in the Middle East. Both sides
are desperate for peace. They are trying for hundreds of years to
produce peace which is an attribute of wisdom. They are trying to
produce peace (fruit) without cultivating the fruit producing tree
(wisdom)! They can keep trying to produce peace for another 1000 years
but unless they create the environment to produce the wisdom tree they
will and can never produce peace. It is the very nature of peace that
it exists only on the wisdom tree. So they come to the peace table
while all along their brains/minds are powered by the attributes of
ignorance - hate and the desire for revenge etc. When the fruit from
the tree of ignorance thrive they choke the fruit of the wisdom tree
and it does not even bloosm. (Someone must awaken both sides to the
very nature of peace!)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;.
Peace is an all or nothing entity, it only comes with the wisdom
package. Even today the states of Europe on the surface are at peace
yet their defense budgets do not reflect peace! What a waste of
resources at least partly due to ignorance of the very nature of peace.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;There are three ways to achieve peace:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; &lt;span&gt;1) Both sides have a change of &amp;#39;heart&amp;#39; (brain) and this is possible. (This is the best way for permanent peace)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;span&gt;2) Both warring factions find out the wisdom way and stick to implementing it.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;span&gt;3) Or a stronger power enforces the wisdom way.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;div id="refHTML"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=830" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>sajidkhan</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/sajidkhan.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>Neural Evidence for Inequality-averse Social Preferences</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/02/01/neural-evidence-for-inequality-averse-social-preferences.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/02/01/neural-evidence-for-inequality-averse-social-preferences.aspx</id><published>2010-02-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2010-02-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Elizabeth Tricomi,
			Antonio Rangel,
			Colin F. Camerer,
			John P. O’Doherty &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A popular hypothesis in the social sciences is that humans have social 
preferences to reduce inequality in outcome distributions because it has
 a negative impact on their experienced reward.
 Although there is a large body of behavioural and anthropological 
evidence consistent with the predictions of these theories,
 there is no direct neural evidence for the existence of 
inequality-averse preferences. Such evidence would be especially useful 
because some behaviours that are consistent with a dislike for unequal 
outcomes could also be explained by concerns for social image
 or reciprocity,
 which do not require a direct aversion towards inequality. Here we use 
functional MRI to test directly for the existence of inequality-averse 
social preferences in the human brain. Inequality was created by 
recruiting pairs of subjects and giving one of them a large monetary 
endowment. While both subjects evaluated further monetary transfers from
 the experimenter to themselves and to the other participant, we 
measured neural responses in the ventral striatum and ventromedial 
prefrontal cortex, two areas that have been shown to be involved in the 
valuation of monetary and primary rewards in both social and non-social 
contexts.
 Consistent with inequality-averse models of social preferences, we find
 that activity in these areas was more responsive to transfers to others
 than to self in the ‘high-pay’ subject, whereas the activity of the 
‘low-pay’ subject showed the opposite pattern. These results provide 
direct evidence for the validity of this class of models, and also show 
that the brain’s reward circuitry is sensitive to both advantageous and 
disadvantageous inequality. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v463/n7284/full/nature08785.html"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Picture from &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikeygottawa/3465599131/"&gt;Flickr Creative Commons&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=820" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /><category term="social psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/social+psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="behavior" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/behavior/default.aspx" /><category term="intelligence" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/intelligence/default.aspx" /><category term="practical wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/practical+wisdom/default.aspx" /><category term="neuroscience" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/neuroscience/default.aspx" /><category term="ethics" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/ethics/default.aspx" /><category term="organizational behavior" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/organizational+behavior/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>The Talking Point: Creating an Environment for Exploring Complex Meaning</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/12/the-talking-point-creating-an-environment-for-exploring-complex-meaning.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/12/the-talking-point-creating-an-environment-for-exploring-complex-meaning.aspx</id><published>2010-02-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2010-02-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="main_content"&gt;&lt;i&gt;(A Collaborative Project of the Institute for 21st Century Agoras)&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The Talking Point is all about how people learn within groups. People
can be much smarter than crowds if you measure “smart” as
decision-making speed. Crowds can be much wiser than individuals if you
measure wisdom by depth of understanding. It is possible to understand
a great deal of information yet (or maybe because of this) you can also
be slow to make decisions. If rushed, crowds will make poor decisions
in spite of their wisdom. So... to get good group decisions on a time
scale that will keep pace with policy development needs and social
necessities, groups have to be supported so that their decision-making
process can be accelerated. Much has been said and written about this
problem over the years. It is dangerous to have the power of groups
without the wisdom of groups, and it is tragic to have the wisdom of
groups without the power of groups. The Talking Point presents a
meeting point for the wisdom and power of groups through the use of
Structured Dialogic Design.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With hopeful intentions, as a culture we have poisoned the well just
when we need it most. We have touted design charettes and stakeholder
processes as engagement vehicles and then ignored, marginalized or
corrupted the very input that we swore to hold as sacred. This has
created a myth that large scale collaboration is not possible, and the
myth has led to considerable disillusionment among would-be
participants and could-be sponsors. Structured Dialogic Design seeks to
bust the myth about our limited capabilities to sustain boundary
spanning collaboration. To bust this myth, Structured Dialogic Design
needs to usher in a new wave of collaborative planning. Scholars have
identified the Structured Dialogic Design methodology as the cutting
edge of “third phase” science - where the reality of a situation
embraces interactions between objective findings and subjective
intentions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Talking Point provides a window for observing how Structured
Dialogic Design has been put into practice and paints a panorama of the
issues that confront complex social system design. This book is itself
a bridge between scholarship and practice, written to be accessible yet
anchored to major themes in cognitive psychology, information systems,
social systems, and models of group learning. The book is an invitation
for transformational leaders and those who support transformational
leaders to pick up a new tool in the essential quest to put our nation
and our world back on track toward sustainable futures. The Talking
Point is a fresh source of water in a world that is thirsty for new
ways of solving complex problems.&amp;quot;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Link to &lt;a href="http://www.infoagepub.com/products/The-Talking-Point"&gt;the publisher.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=735" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>The role of therapist self-disclosure in psychotherapy: A qualitative review.</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/14/the-role-of-therapist-self-disclosure-in-psychotherapy-a-qualitative-review.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/14/the-role-of-therapist-self-disclosure-in-psychotherapy-a-qualitative-review.aspx</id><published>2010-02-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2010-02-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jennifer R. Henretty, Heidi M. Levitt&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Over 90% of therapists self-disclose to clients (Mathews, 1989; Pope,
Tabachnick, &amp;amp; Keith-Spiegel, 1987; Edwards &amp;amp; Murdock, 1994),
however, the implications of therapist self-disclosure are unclear,
with highly divergent results from one study to the next. The goal of
this paper was to review the empirical literature relevant to therapist
self-disclosure, and provide the reader with a comprehensive
understanding of the factors that affect, and are affected by,
therapist self-disclosure. Findings are organized into an integrated
model examining the who, what, when, why, and how of therapist
self-disclosure. In addition, training implications and suggestions for
future research are provided.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://web.ebscohost.com.proxy.uchicago.edu/ehost/detail?vid=1&amp;amp;hid=107&amp;amp;sid=088a4de2-61d8-4f1a-8a58-1fde727d83fc%40sessionmgr113&amp;amp;bdata=JmxvZ2lucGFnZT1Mb2dpbi5hc3Amc2l0ZT1laG9zdC1saXZlJnNjb3BlPXNpdGU%3d#db=aph&amp;amp;AN=46760742"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=741" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Leadership and Cultural  Context: A theoretical and empirical examination based on Project GLOBE.</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/02/26/leadership-and-cultural-context-a-theoretical-and-empirical-examination-based-on-project-globe.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/02/26/leadership-and-cultural-context-a-theoretical-and-empirical-examination-based-on-project-globe.aspx</id><published>2010-02-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2010-02-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">In this chapter we examine how effective leadership varies across national and cultural boundaries.  Specifically, we ask what elements of leadership are core and more universal across these boundaries?  The foundation of our approach is the notion that organizations and societies have implicit leadership theories, wherein beliefs about the attributes that define effective leadership are contained in distinctive cognitive structures, or schemas.  The content of such schemas shapes perceptions by individuals regarding who is and who is not a leader.  While schemas about leadership are shaped by an individual&amp;#39;s early personal experiences with and observations of those acting as leaders, a shared schema may also develop within a cultural group and influence the most effective way to lead across these cultural groups.  &lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=821" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>phanges</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/phanges.aspx</uri></author><category term="culture" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/culture/default.aspx" /><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="social psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/social+psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="leadership" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/leadership/default.aspx" /><category term="cognition" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/cognition/default.aspx" /><category term="organizational behavior" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/organizational+behavior/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Infant and Early Childhood Exposure to Adult-Directed and Child-Directed Television Programming: Relations with Cognitive Skills at Age Four</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/03/03/infant-and-early-childhood-exposure-to-adult-directed-and-child-directed-television-programming-relations-with-cognitive-skills-at-age-four.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/03/03/infant-and-early-childhood-exposure-to-adult-directed-and-child-directed-television-programming-relations-with-cognitive-skills-at-age-four.aspx</id><published>2010-01-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2010-01-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;By Rachel Barr, Alexis Lauricella, Elizabeth Zack, Sandra L. Calvert.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; This study described the relations among the amount of child-directed
versus adult-directed television exposure at ages 1 and 4 with
cognitive outcomes at age 4. Sixty parents completed 24-hour television
diaries when their children were 1 and 4 years of age. At age 4, their
children also completed a series of cognitive measures and parents
completed an assessment of their children&amp;#39;s executive functioning
skills. High levels of exposure to programs designed for adults during
both infancy and at age 4, and high levels of household television use
at age 4, were all associated with poorer executive functioning at age
4. High exposure to television programs designed for adults during the
preschool years was also associated with poorer cognitive outcomes at
age 4. In contrast, exposure to television programs designed for young
children at either time point was not associated with any outcome
measure at age 4. These results suggest that exposure to child-directed
versus adult-directed television content is an important factor in
understanding the relation between media exposure and developmental
outcomes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the&lt;a href="http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/merrill-palmer_quarterly/summary/v056/56.1.barr.html"&gt; article&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=825" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Cait</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/Cait.aspx</uri></author><category term="culture" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/culture/default.aspx" /><category term="cognition" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/cognition/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Evolving the Capacity to Understand Actions, Intentions, and Goals</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/02/12/evolving-the-capacity-to-understand-actions-intentions-and-goals.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/02/12/evolving-the-capacity-to-understand-actions-intentions-and-goals.aspx</id><published>2010-01-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2010-01-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Marc Hauser and Justin Wood&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We synthesize the contrasting predictions of motor simulation and
teleological theories of action comprehension and present evidence from
a series of studies showing that monkeys and apes—like humans—extract
the meaning of an event by (&lt;i&gt;a&lt;/i&gt;) going beyond the surface appearance of actions, attributing goals and intentions to the agent; (&lt;i&gt;b&lt;/i&gt;) using details about the environment to infer when an action is rational or irrational; (&lt;i&gt;c&lt;/i&gt;)
making predictions about an agent&amp;#39;s goal and the most probable action
to obtain the goal, within the constraints of the situation; (&lt;i&gt;d&lt;/i&gt;) predicting the most probable outcome of actions even when they are physiologically incapable of producing the actions; and (&lt;i&gt;e&lt;/i&gt;)
combining information about means and outcomes to make decisions about
social interactions, some with moral relevance. These studies reveal
the limitations of motor simulation theories, especially those that
rely on the notion of direct matching and mirror neuron activation.
They provide support, however, for a teleological theory, rooted in an
inferential process that extracts information about action means,
potential goals, and the environmental constraints that limit rational
action.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://arjournals.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100434"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=784" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /><category term="intelligence" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/intelligence/default.aspx" /><category term="wisdom-related knowledge" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/wisdom-related+knowledge/default.aspx" /><category term="cognition" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/cognition/default.aspx" /><category term="practical wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/practical+wisdom/default.aspx" /><category term="neuroscience" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/neuroscience/default.aspx" /><category term="biology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/biology/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Comparing the Neural Basis of Monetary Reward and Cognitive Feedback during Information-Integration Category Learning</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/02/12/comparing-the-neural-basis-of-monetary-reward-and-cognitive-feedback-during-information-integration-category-learning.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/02/12/comparing-the-neural-basis-of-monetary-reward-and-cognitive-feedback-during-information-integration-category-learning.aspx</id><published>2010-01-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2010-01-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;

Reka Daniel and 
Stefan Pollmann
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;The dopaminergic system is known to play a central role in reward-based&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;learning (Schultz, 2006), yet it was also observed to be involved&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;when only cognitive feedback is given (Aron et al., 2004). Within&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;the domain of information-integration category learning, in&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;which information from several stimulus dimensions has to be&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;integrated predecisionally (Ashby and Maddox, 2005), the importance&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;of
contingent feedback is well established (Maddox et al., 2003). We
examined the common neural correlates of reward anticipation&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;and prediction error in this task. Sixteen subjects performed&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;two parallel information-integration tasks within a single event-related&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;functional magnetic resonance imaging session but received a&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;monetary reward only for one of them. Similar functional areas&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;including basal ganglia structures were activated in both task&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;versions. In contrast, a single structure, the nucleus accumbens,&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;showed higher activation during monetary reward anticipation&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;compared with the anticipation of cognitive feedback in information-integration&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;learning. Additionally, this activation was predicted by measures&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;of intrinsic motivation in the cognitive feedback task and by&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;measures of extrinsic motivation in the rewarded task. Our results&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;indicate that, although all other structures implicated in category&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;learning are not significantly affected by altering the type&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;of reward, the nucleus accumbens responds to the positive incentive&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;properties of an expected reward depending on the specific type&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;of the reward.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www.jneurosci.org/cgi/content/abstract/30/1/47"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=789" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /><category term="behavior" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/behavior/default.aspx" /><category term="cognition" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/cognition/default.aspx" /><category term="practical wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/practical+wisdom/default.aspx" /><category term="neuroscience" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/neuroscience/default.aspx" /><category term="knowledge" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/knowledge/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>A Distraction Can Impair or Enhance Motor Performance</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/02/12/a-distraction-can-impair-or-enhance-motor-performance.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/02/12/a-distraction-can-impair-or-enhance-motor-performance.aspx</id><published>2010-01-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2010-01-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Christopher Hemond, Rachel M. Brown, Edwin M. Robertson&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Humans have a prodigious capacity to perform multiple tasks&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;simultaneously. Being distracted while, for example, performing&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;a complex motor skill adds complexity to a task and thus leads&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;to a performance impairment. Yet, it may not be just the presence&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;or absence of a distraction that affects motor performance.&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;Instead, the characteristics of the distraction may play a critical&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;role in affecting human motor performance. Here, we show that&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;performance of a motor sequence can be substantially enhanced&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;by simultaneously learning an independent color sequence. In&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;contrast, performance of the same motor sequence was impaired&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;by concurrently counting the number of red cues that were in&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;the color sequence. The color and motor sequences had different&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;lengths (10 vs 12 items), different numbers of elements (five&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;vs four elements), and different temporal patterns (randomly&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;intermittent vs continuous) and thus were independent of one&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;another. These observations show that distracting information&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;does not always impair motor performance, and so is not a sufficient&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;explanation for the impaired performance. Instead, the influence&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;that a distraction exerts upon performance is mediated by the&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;type of processes engaged: when similar core processes are engaged,&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;motor performance is enhanced, whereas when very different processes&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;are engaged (i.e., counting and sequence performance), performance&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;is impaired. Thus, these observations deepen our understanding&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;of how a distraction, depending on its characteristics, can&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;either impair or enhance performance and may offer novel approaches&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;to optimizing human cognition. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www.jneurosci.org/cgi/content/abstract/30/2/650"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=790" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /><category term="behavior" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/behavior/default.aspx" /><category term="cognition" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/cognition/default.aspx" /><category term="Performance" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/Performance/default.aspx" /><category term="neuroscience" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/neuroscience/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Challenging Certainty: The Utility and History of Counterfactualism</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/02/18/challenging-certainty-the-utility-and-history-of-counterfactualism.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/02/18/challenging-certainty-the-utility-and-history-of-counterfactualism.aspx</id><published>2010-01-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2010-01-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Simon T. Kaye&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Counterfactualism is a useful process for historians as a
thought-experiment because it offers grounds to challenge an
unfortunate contemporary historical mindset of assumed, deterministic
certainty. This article suggests that the methodological value of
counterfactualism may be understood in terms of the three categories of
common ahistorical errors that it may help to prevent: the assumptions
of &lt;span class="i"&gt;indispensability, causality&lt;/span&gt;, and &lt;span class="i"&gt;inevitability.&lt;/span&gt;
To support this claim, I survey a series of key counterfactual works
and reflections on counterfactualism, arguing that the practice of
counterfactualism evolved as both cause and product of an evolving
popular assumption of the plasticity of history and the importance of
human agency within it. For these reasons, counterfactualism is of
particular importance both historically and politically. I conclude
that it is time for a methodological re-assessment of the uses of such
thought-experiments in history, particularly in light of
counterfactualism&amp;#39;s developmental relatedness to cultural,
technological, and analytical modernity.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/123265661/abstract"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=805" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="culture" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/culture/default.aspx" /><category term="social psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/social+psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="wisdom-related knowledge" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/wisdom-related+knowledge/default.aspx" /><category term="knowledge" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/knowledge/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Embodied Cognition and Mindreading</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/02/18/embodied-cognition-and-mindreading.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/02/18/embodied-cognition-and-mindreading.aspx</id><published>2010-01-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2010-01-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Shannon Spaulding&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="para"&gt;Recently,
philosophers and psychologists defending the embodied cognition
research program have offered arguments against mindreading as a
general model of our social understanding. The embodied cognition
arguments are of two kinds: those that challenge the developmental
picture of mindreading and those that challenge the alleged ubiquity of
mindreading. Together, these two kinds of arguments, if successful,
would present a serious challenge to the standard account of human
social understanding. In this paper, I examine the strongest of these
embodied cognition arguments and argue that mindreading approaches can
withstand the best of these arguments from embodied cognition.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="para"&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/123243927/abstract"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=806" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="social psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/social+psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="cognition" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/cognition/default.aspx" /><category term="PHILOSOPHY" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/PHILOSOPHY/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>A Social-Cognitive Framework of Multidisciplinary Team Innovation</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/01/a-social-cognitive-framework-of-multidisciplinary-team-innovation.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/01/a-social-cognitive-framework-of-multidisciplinary-team-innovation.aspx</id><published>2010-01-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2010-01-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="name"&gt;&lt;span class="forenames"&gt;Susannah B. F.&lt;/span&gt;
					&lt;span class="surname"&gt;Paletz&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span class="name"&gt;&lt;span class="forenames"&gt;Christian D.&lt;/span&gt;
					&lt;span class="surname"&gt;Schunn&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The psychology of science typically lacks integration between cognitive
and social variables. We present a new framework of team innovation in
multidisciplinary science and engineering groups that ties factors from
both literatures together. We focus on the effects of a particularly
challenging social factor, knowledge diversity, which has a history of
mixed effects on creativity, most likely because those effects are
mediated and moderated by cognitive and additional social variables. In
addition, we highlight the distinction between team innovative
processes that are primarily divergent versus convergent; we propose
that the social and cognitive implications are different for each,
providing a possible explanation for knowledge diversity&amp;#39;s mixed
results on team outcomes. Social variables mapped out include formal
roles, communication norms, sufficient participation and information
sharing, and task conflict; cognitive variables include analogy,
information search, and evaluation. This framework provides a roadmap
for research that aims to harness the power of multidisciplinary teams.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/122305305/abstract"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Picture from &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/creativecommons/"&gt;Flickr Creative Commons&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=807" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /><category term="social psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/social+psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="intelligence" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/intelligence/default.aspx" /><category term="cognition" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/cognition/default.aspx" /><category term="practical wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/practical+wisdom/default.aspx" /><category term="organizational behavior" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/organizational+behavior/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>The Freedom of Desire: Hegel's Response to Rousseau on the Problem of Civil Society</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/02/18/the-freedom-of-desire-hegel-s-response-to-rousseau-on-the-problem-of-civil-society.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/02/18/the-freedom-of-desire-hegel-s-response-to-rousseau-on-the-problem-of-civil-society.aspx</id><published>2010-01-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2010-01-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jeffrey Church &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="i"&gt;The ever-growing body of literature on civil society
can benefit from a return to the original theoretical articulation and
defense of the concept in the work of G.W.F. Hegel. Specifically, this
article suggests that Jean-Jacques Rousseau&amp;#39;s influential critique of
civil society remains unanswered and argues that Hegel responded with a
sweeping and sympathetic institutional design that remains relevant
today. Hegel agrees with Rousseau that commercial society aggravates
the dissatisfaction of its members, and that educating individual
desire through institutional design is necessary to solve this
difficulty. However, modern states need not adopt Rousseau&amp;#39;s extreme
and impracticable solution. Hegel&amp;#39;s concrete, market-based associations
of civil society render desires satiable and elevate them to accord
with the common good, while still maintaining the freedom and
distinctness of a pluralistic modern society.&lt;/span&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/123227261/abstract"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=809" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="culture" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/culture/default.aspx" /><category term="social psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/social+psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="behavior" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/behavior/default.aspx" /><category term="practical wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/practical+wisdom/default.aspx" /><category term="virtue" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/virtue/default.aspx" /><category term="PHILOSOPHY" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/PHILOSOPHY/default.aspx" /><category term="ethics" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/ethics/default.aspx" /><category term="political science" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/political+science/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Good and Good For You: An Affect Theory of Happiness</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/01/good-and-good-for-you-an-affect-theory-of-happiness.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/01/good-and-good-for-you-an-affect-theory-of-happiness.aspx</id><published>2010-01-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2010-01-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Laura Sizer&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Happiness is something we all want and strive for. But what is it and why do we want it so badly? Philosophers have offered two sorts of answers to the first question, identifying happiness either with a psychological state or condition (a feeling, emotion or set of judgments), or with the conditions of a life—how well the life is going for the person living it, often measured by some objective standard of value. These two approaches, what I’ll henceforth refer to as subjective, or ‘good feelings,’ and objective, ‘good lives’ accounts of happiness, reflect tensions in our intuitions about the nature of happiness. Each approach captures different, but important, features of our intuitions, making it difficult to accept either a purely subjective or objective view. This has led some philosophers to suggest that these are not competing accounts of one thing, ‘happiness,’ but accounts of several different things to which everyday language has, unfortunately, given the same name (Thomas 1968; Haybron 2000). Others propose that each is a&lt;br /&gt;necessary component of happiness, that happiness is a matter of possessing both the relevant subjective and objective properties (*** 1979; Nozick 1989, e.g.). I think this latter view is right, but that we need to better understand why or how these two elements are important and how they might be linked. In this paper I argue that an affect theory of happiness is able to reconcile both the subjective and objective strands of our intuitions about happiness.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/123226711/abstract"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Photo from &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/creativecommons/"&gt;Flickr Creative Commons&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=810" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="PHILOSOPHY" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/PHILOSOPHY/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Parents and peers as providers of support in adolescents' social network: a developmental perspective</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/15/parents-and-peers-as-providers-of-support-in-adolescents-social-network-a-developmental-perspective.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/15/parents-and-peers-as-providers-of-support-in-adolescents-social-network-a-developmental-perspective.aspx</id><published>2010-01-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2010-01-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Jorge F. del Valle, Amaia Bravo, Mónica López&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The authors carried out an assessment of social support networks with a
sample of 884 Spanish adolescents aged 12 to 17. The main goal was to
analyze the development of the figures of parents and peers as
providers of social support in the two basic dimensions of emotional
and instrumental support. In peers, they distinguished between the
contexts from which they came (school, associations, and friends from
the community) to observe whether there were different tendencies. The
results of the MANOVA indicate significant effects on both dimensions
for the factors age, provider, and interaction between the two. The
authors conclude that the tendencies for decline in the provision of
support from parents and the corresponding increase in support from
peers during adolescence are different for each dimension, and also for
the different types of friends, according to context. Parents maintain
a good level of instrumental support, but not of emotional support.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www3.interscience.wiley.com.proxy.uchicago.edu/journal/123215878/abstract"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=755" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="social psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/social+psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="intelligence" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/intelligence/default.aspx" /><category term="Education" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/Education/default.aspx" /><category term="ethics" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/ethics/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Cognitive Management in an Enduring National Rivalry: The Case of India and Pakistan</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/15/cognitive-management-in-an-enduring-national-rivalry-the-case-of-india-and-pakistan.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/15/cognitive-management-in-an-enduring-national-rivalry-the-case-of-india-and-pakistan.aspx</id><published>2010-01-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2010-01-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="name"&gt;&lt;span class="forenames"&gt;Peter&lt;/span&gt;
					&lt;span class="surname"&gt;Suedfeld,&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="name"&gt;&lt;span class="forenames"&gt;Rajiv&lt;/span&gt;
					&lt;span class="surname"&gt;Jhangiani&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;sup&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;&amp;nbsp;
          &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Using integrative complexity scoring, the current study addresses how
communications by leaders of India and Pakistan have revealed their
information processing and decision-making strategies. The hostility
between India and Pakistan started with the official creation of the
two states and has lasted through more than a half-century. It has been
marked by four full-scale wars and almost constant ethnopolitical,
terrorist, and guerrilla violence. It is one of the most enduring and
bloody binational rivalries of recent decades. Shared aspects of
history and culture make the comparisons relatively free of confounding
factors. In common with previous findings, complexity scores have shown
reliable associations with impending war and with continued peace (or
low-intensity conflict).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Read the &lt;a href="http://www3.interscience.wiley.com.proxy.uchicago.edu/journal/122651930/abstract"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=757" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="culture" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/culture/default.aspx" /><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /><category term="social psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/social+psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="practical wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/practical+wisdom/default.aspx" /><category term="organizational behavior" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/organizational+behavior/default.aspx" /><category term="political science" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/political+science/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Dynamic Cultural Influences on Neural Representations of the Self</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/01/dynamic-cultural-influences-on-neural-representations-of-the-self.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/01/dynamic-cultural-influences-on-neural-representations-of-the-self.aspx</id><published>2010-01-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2010-01-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight:normal;"&gt;Joan Y. Chiao&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight:normal;" class="NLM_xref-aff"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight:normal;"&gt;, Tokiko Harada&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight:normal;" class="NLM_xref-aff"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight:normal;"&gt;, Hidetsugu Komeda&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight:normal;" class="NLM_xref-aff"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight:normal;"&gt;, Zhang Li&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight:normal;" class="NLM_xref-aff"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight:normal;"&gt;, Yoko Mano&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight:normal;" class="NLM_xref-aff"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight:normal;"&gt;, Daisuke Saito&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight:normal;" class="NLM_xref-aff"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight:normal;"&gt;, Todd B. Parrish&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight:normal;" class="NLM_xref-aff"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight:normal;"&gt;, Norihiro Sadato&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight:normal;" class="NLM_xref-aff"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight:normal;"&gt; and Tetsuya Iidaka&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="NLM_xref-aff"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;People living in multicultural environments often encounter situations
which require them to acquire different cultural schemas and to switch
between these cultural schemas depending on their immediate
sociocultural context. Prior behavioral studies show that priming
cultural schemas reliably impacts mental processes and behavior
underlying self-concept. However, less well understood is whether or
not cultural priming affects neurobiological mechanisms underlying the
self. Here we examined whether priming cultural values of individualism
and collectivism in bicultural individuals affects neural activity in
cortical midline structures underlying self-relevant processes using
functional magnetic resonance imaging. Biculturals primed with
individualistic values showed increased activation within medial
prefrontal cortex (MPFC) and posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) during
general relative to contextual self-judgments, whereas biculturals
primed with collectivistic values showed increased response within MPFC
and PCC during contextual relative to general self-judgments. Moreover,
degree of cultural priming was positively correlated with degree of
MPFC and PCC activity during culturally congruent self-judgments. These
findings illustrate the dynamic influence of culture on neural
representations underlying the self and, more broadly, suggest a
neurobiological basis by which people acculturate to novel environments.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1162/jocn.2009.21192"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Photo from &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/fensterbme/2060996958/"&gt;Flickr Creative Commons. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=701" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="culture" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/culture/default.aspx" /><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Democracy and Judicial Review: Are They Really Incompatible?</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/12/01/democracy-and-judicial-review-are-they-really-incompatible.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/12/01/democracy-and-judicial-review-are-they-really-incompatible.aspx</id><published>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Annabelle Lever&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This article shows that judicial review has a democratic justification,
although it is not necessary for democratic government and its virtues
are controversial and often speculative. Against critics like Waldron
and Bellamy, it shows that judges, no less than legislators, can embody
democratic forms of representation, accountability and participation.
Hence, judicial review is not undemocratic simply because it enables
unelected judges to over-rule elected legislators when people disagree
about rights. Against recent defenders of judicial review, such as
Eisgruber and Brettschneider, it shows that democratic arguments for
judicial review do not require judges to be better at protecting rights
than legislators. Hence a democratic justification for judicial review
does not depend on complex and inevitably controversial interpretations
and evaluations of judicial as opposed to legislative judgments.
Democratic government does not demand special virtue, competence or
wisdom in its citizens or their leaders. From a democratic perspective,
therefore, the case for judicial review is that it enables individuals
to vindicate their rights against government in ways that parallel
those they commonly use against each other. This makes judicial review
normatively attractive whether or not it leads to better decisions than
would be made by other means.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&amp;amp;aid=6677164&amp;amp;fulltextType=RA&amp;amp;fileId=S1537592709991812"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=702" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="organizational behavior" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/organizational+behavior/default.aspx" /><category term="political science" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/political+science/default.aspx" /><category term="knowledge" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/knowledge/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>What Is Political Psychology?</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/06/what-is-political-psychology.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/06/what-is-political-psychology.aspx</id><published>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Kristen Renwick Monroea, William Chiua, Adam Martina and Bridgette Portman&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We contribute to a greater understanding of political psychology by 1)
collecting data in a more systematic way for the intellectual
community, 2) sensitizing students to the extent to which any
intellectual discipline is socially constructed and is a work in
progress, 3) heightening awareness of the political aspects of
intellectual life, 4) exposing readers to the wide variety of diverse
approaches and methodologies utilized by political psychologists, and
5) suggesting the range of topics that political psychology can address
successfully and the range of techniques it can utilize.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&amp;amp;aid=6677212&amp;amp;fulltextType=RA&amp;amp;fileId=S153759270999185X"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=703" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="Wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/Wisdom/default.aspx" /><category term="political science" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/political+science/default.aspx" /><category term="knowledge" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/knowledge/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Measuring the Quality of Life in the U.S.: Political Reflections</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/06/measuring-the-quality-of-life-in-the-u-s-political-reflections.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/06/measuring-the-quality-of-life-in-the-u-s-political-reflections.aspx</id><published>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jacob Hacker &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A review of &lt;i&gt;The Measure of America: American Human Development Report, 2008-2009&lt;/i&gt;, by Sarah Burd-Sharps, Kristen Lewis, and Eduardo Borges Martins. Reports from abroad on the American condition have a special place in the canon of social commentary. There is Lord Bryce&amp;#39;s American Commonwealth (1888), Gunnar Myrdal&amp;#39;s American Dilemma: The Negro Problem and Modern Democracy (1944), Werner Sombart&amp;#39;s Why Is There No Socialism in the United States? (1906) and, of course—the standard setter—Alexis de Tocqueville&amp;#39;s Democracy in America in 1835. What makes these works touchstones is not just the quality of the analysis or the fame of their authors but the privileged status they have come to enjoy as works of external reflection and criticism. For a people prone to ignore the rest of the world or see abroad only a mirror image of themselves, Americans have always had a surprisingly soft spot for the foreign observer willing to discourse on what makes their nation unique.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=PPS"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=705" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="culture" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/culture/default.aspx" /><category term="wisdom-related knowledge" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/wisdom-related+knowledge/default.aspx" /><category term="Education" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/Education/default.aspx" /><category term="political science" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/political+science/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Imagination, Concentration, and Generalization: Peirce on the Reasoning Abilities of the Mathematician</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/12/01/imagination-concentration-and-generalization-peirce-on-the-reasoning-abilities-of-the-mathematician.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/12/01/imagination-concentration-and-generalization-peirce-on-the-reasoning-abilities-of-the-mathematician.aspx</id><published>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;By Daniel G. Campos &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I discuss the epistemic conditions for the possibility of mathematical
discovery that are implied by Peirce’s logic of mathematical inquiry.
Peirce describes the mathematician’s reasoning abilities as the powers
of imagination, concentration, and generalization. I interpret all
three as different semiotic abilities to reason with mathematical
icons, given Peirce’s conception of mathematics as the study of what is
true of hypothetical states of things and his view of mathematical
method as experimentation upon diagrams that embody formal relations.
These abilities come into play at different stages of the process of
experimentation upon diagrams. I illustrate Peirce’s view with a
historical example from ancient Greek geometry.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Read the&lt;a href="http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/transactions_of_the_charles_s_peirce_society/summary/v045/45.2.campos.html"&gt; article.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=706" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Cait</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/Cait.aspx</uri></author><category term="PHILOSOPHY" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/PHILOSOPHY/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Attending to Nature: Empathetic Engagement with the More than Human World</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/07/attending-to-nature-empathetic-engagement-with-the-more-than-human-world.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/07/attending-to-nature-empathetic-engagement-with-the-more-than-human-world.aspx</id><published>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;By Lori Gruen&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Val Plumwood urged us to attend to earth others in non-dualistic ways.
In this essay I suggest that such attention be promoted through what I
call &amp;quot;engaged empathy.&amp;quot; Engaged empathy involves critical attention to
the conditions that undermine the well being or flourishing of those to
whom empathy is directed and this requires moral agents to attend to
things they might not have otherwise. Engaged empathy requires gaining
wisdom and perspective and, importantly, motivates the empathizer to
act ethically. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/ethics_and_the_environment/summary/v014/14.2.gruen.html"&gt;article.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=707" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Cait</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/Cait.aspx</uri></author><category term="ethics" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/ethics/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>A Theology of Meaning: Hasidism and Deconstruction in Elie Wiesel's Souls on Fire</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/07/a-theology-of-meaning-hasidism-and-deconstruction-in-elie-wiesel-s-souls-on-fire.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/07/a-theology-of-meaning-hasidism-and-deconstruction-in-elie-wiesel-s-souls-on-fire.aspx</id><published>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;By Lauren Barlow&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Elie Wiesel&amp;#39;s 
&lt;span style="font-style:italic;"&gt;Souls on Fire&lt;/span&gt;, released in
1972, is a personal retelling of the lives and legends of the early
Hasidic masters of Eastern Europe. The novel begins with the movement&amp;#39;s
founder, the Baal Shem, and chronicles the rise and development of the
movement through the teachings and lives of those who followed him.
Although these lives are filled with fantasy, paradox, and
contradiction, Wiesel&amp;#39;s account has one constant message: in the
suffering of exile, every Jew can speak for God. When &lt;span style="font-style:italic;"&gt;Souls on Fire&lt;/span&gt; was released,
Victor Malka asked Elie Wiesel, &amp;quot;What is, for you, the greatest Hasidic
saying?&amp;quot; and Wiesel replied, &amp;quot;There is much to choose from. Without
doubt, one that I find beautiful and like very much is the saying of
this master: &amp;#39;I have always sought to discover what man is, and finally
I have understood. He is the language of God&amp;#39;&amp;quot; (Malka 37). And this is
the message that Wiesel explores in &lt;span style="font-style:italic;"&gt;Souls on Fire&lt;/span&gt; as he presents
the words of Hasidic masters who taught that, despite God&amp;#39;s absence,
every Jew can give meaning to existence and provide comfort in
suffering through word and deed. Stated more simply, Wiesel&amp;#39;s Hasidism
teaches that through speech and action, man can become the language of
God. For this paper, I would like to explore in &lt;span style="font-style:italic;"&gt;Souls on Fire&lt;/span&gt; how it is that
man is the language of God. And in exploring this question, I would
also like to illustrate the resonances between this aspect of Jewish
theology and deconstruction, by drawing from Derrida&amp;#39;s &amp;quot;Edmond Jabés
and The Question of the Book.&amp;quot; For, the correspondence between these
two illustrates that in the absence of God and all that He symbolizes,
writing can be a form of prayer that can begin to redeem both man and
God. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/studies_in_american_jewish_literature/summary/v028/28.barlow.html"&gt;article.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=708" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Cait</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/Cait.aspx</uri></author><category term="theology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/theology/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Translation as Self-Consciousness: Ancient Sciences, Antediluvian Wisdom, and the ‘Abbāsid Translation Movement</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/07/translation-as-self-consciousness-ancient-sciences-antediluvian-wisdom-and-the-abb-sid-translation-movement.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/07/translation-as-self-consciousness-ancient-sciences-antediluvian-wisdom-and-the-abb-sid-translation-movement.aspx</id><published>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;By Hayrettín Yücesoy&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
This article discusses the translation of ancient Greek, Indian, and
Persian texts of philosophy and sciences into Arabic from the eighth
through the tenth centuries c.e.
In particular, it addresses the issue of how ancient sciences were
justified and legitimized in the early ‘Abbāsid period (ca. 750–850).
Modern scholars have so far devoted a great deal of attention to the
role of the caliphate and its administrative elite in the translation
movement, but they have by and large neglected the role of prevailing
ideological and intellectual discourses as a major component of the
legitimating process in ‘Abbāsid society. Less concerned with
documenting practical needs or emphasizing the role of the caliphate to
explain the history of the translation movement, this article explores
how the narratives of prophetic and antediluvian wisdom as a discursive
intervention shaped, within the broader context of scholarly
consciousness, the reception history of ancient sciences. It argues
that the reference to occult and prophetic knowledge, often attributed
to Hermes, as the source of all knowledge, articulated, with the idioms
of the developing discourse of &lt;i&gt;‘ilm,&lt;/i&gt; the desire to cast ancient
sciences as part of an Islamic monotheistic narrative and the emerging
historical consciousness that embraced the past as a theater of
prophetic action. &lt;/p&gt;

 Read the &lt;a href="http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/journal_of_world_history/summary/v020/20.4.yucesoy.html"&gt;article. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=709" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Cait</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/Cait.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>Unconscious Learning versus Visual Perception: Dissociable Roles for Gamma Oscillations Revealed in MEG</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/11/unconscious-learning-versus-visual-perception-dissociable-roles-for-gamma-oscillations-revealed-in-meg.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/11/unconscious-learning-versus-visual-perception-dissociable-roles-for-gamma-oscillations-revealed-in-meg.aspx</id><published>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Maximilien Chaumon&lt;span class="NLM_xref-aff"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;, Denis Schwartz&lt;span class="NLM_xref-aff"&gt;&lt;/span&gt; and Catherine Tallon-Baudry&lt;span class="NLM_xref-aff"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Oscillatory synchrony in the gamma band (30–120 Hz) has been involved
in various cognitive functions including conscious perception and
learning. Explicit memory encoding, in particular, relies on enhanced
gamma oscillations. Does this finding extend to unconscious memory
encoding? Can we dissociate gamma oscillations related to unconscious
learning and to conscious perception? We investigate these issues in a
magnetoencephalographic experiment using a modified version of the
contextual cueing paradigm. In this visual search task, repeated
presentation of search arrays triggers an unconscious spatial learning
process that speeds reaction times but leaves conscious perception
unaffected. In addition to a high-frequency perceptual gamma activity
present throughout the experiment, we reveal the existence of a
fronto-occipital network synchronized in the low gamma range
specifically engaged in unconscious learning. This network shows up as
soon as a display is searched for the second time and disappears as
behavior gets affected. We suggest that oscillations in this network
shape neural processing to build an efficient neural route for learned
displays. Accordingly, in the last part of the experiment, evoked
responses dissociate learned images at early latencies, suggesting that
a sharpened representation is activated without resort on learning
gamma oscillations, whereas perceptual gamma oscillations remain
unaffected.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1162/jocn.2008.21155"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=725" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="intelligence" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/intelligence/default.aspx" /><category term="cognition" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/cognition/default.aspx" /><category term="neuroscience" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/neuroscience/default.aspx" /><category term="knowledge" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/knowledge/default.aspx" /><category term="biology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/biology/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>A Longitudinal Test of the Model of Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/15/a-longitudinal-test-of-the-model-of-political-conservatism-as-motivated-social-cognition.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/15/a-longitudinal-test-of-the-model-of-political-conservatism-as-motivated-social-cognition.aspx</id><published>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="name"&gt;&lt;span class="forenames"&gt;Miriam&lt;/span&gt;
					&lt;span class="surname"&gt;Matthews&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span class="name"&gt;&lt;span class="forenames"&gt;Shana&lt;/span&gt;
					&lt;span class="surname"&gt;Levin&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span class="name"&gt;&lt;span class="forenames"&gt;Jim&lt;/span&gt;
					&lt;span class="surname"&gt;Sidanius&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Using data from a longitudinal study of college students, this study
assessed the relationships among the threat perceptions of realistic
threat and intergroup anxiety, the ideological motives of system
justification and social dominance orientation (SDO), and political
conservatism. Those who had higher perceptions of realistic threat and
intergroup anxiety at the end of their first year of college showed
higher levels of system justification and SDO at the end of their
second and third years of college, controlling for precollege
expressions of each variable. Higher levels of these two ideological
motives at the end of students&amp;#39; second and third years of college were
associated with more politically conservative attitudes at the end of
students&amp;#39; fourth year of college, again controlling for precollege
expressions. These longitudinal results are discussed in terms of a
model of political conservatism as motivated social cognition.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www3.interscience.wiley.com.proxy.uchicago.edu/journal/122651905/abstract"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=756" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="culture" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/culture/default.aspx" /><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /><category term="social psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/social+psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="cognition" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/cognition/default.aspx" /><category term="practical wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/practical+wisdom/default.aspx" /><category term="ethics" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/ethics/default.aspx" /><category term="organizational behavior" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/organizational+behavior/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Restricted and Elaborated Modes in the Cultural Analysis of Politics</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/15/restricted-and-elaborated-modes-in-the-cultural-analysis-of-politics.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/15/restricted-and-elaborated-modes-in-the-cultural-analysis-of-politics.aspx</id><published>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Brian Steensland&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; The &amp;quot;cultural turn&amp;quot; that swept across the social sciences a generation
ago ushered in renewed attention to the cultural analysis of politics.
Yet despite this growing area of research, there remains a lack of
integration between cultural and noncultural studies of political
phenomena. Should this state of affairs be a source of concern for
cultural sociologists? I believe it should be. In this essay, I outline
reasons why this is the case and what might be done to address this
issue. Drawing loosely on Basil Bernstein&amp;#39;s distinction between
&amp;quot;restricted&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;elaborated&amp;quot; codes, I suggest that cultural analyses
of politics need to be more &amp;quot;elaborated&amp;quot; in nature and I offer three
guidelines that can orient this type of research program.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www3.interscience.wiley.com.proxy.uchicago.edu/journal/122649425/abstract?CRETRY=1&amp;amp;SRETRY=0"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=754" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="culture" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/culture/default.aspx" /><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="social psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/social+psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="ethics" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/ethics/default.aspx" /><category term="political science" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/political+science/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Purpose: giftedness in intrapersonal intelligence.</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/14/purpose-giftedness-in-intrapersonal-intelligence.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/14/purpose-giftedness-in-intrapersonal-intelligence.aspx</id><published>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Seana Moran&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Purpose is an internal compass that integrates engagement in activities
that affect others, self-awareness of one&amp;#39;s reasons, and the intention
to continue these activities. We argue that purpose represents
giftedness in intrapersonal intelligence, which processes information
related to self, identity, self-regulation, and one&amp;#39;s place in the
world. Purpose is an extraordinary achievement. It is an ideal that
young people are expected to accomplish by the end of high school, yet
in our mixed methods study, only 26% of our sample overall (N=270 youth
age 12-22) expressed a purpose. Still, purpose can be achieved
precociously. Some youth achieve purpose much earlier than the norm: 11
6th graders in our sample showed a purpose.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://web.ebscohost.com.proxy.uchicago.edu/ehost/detail?vid=1&amp;amp;hid=107&amp;amp;sid=1ca3d579-8bf1-4f02-b15a-3b4f251389ac%40sessionmgr111&amp;amp;bdata=JmxvZ2lucGFnZT1Mb2dpbi5hc3Amc2l0ZT1laG9zdC1saXZlJnNjb3BlPXNpdGU%3d#db=aph&amp;amp;AN=45605830"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=742" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /><category term="intelligence" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/intelligence/default.aspx" /><category term="practical wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/practical+wisdom/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Automatic Evaluation</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/12/01/automatic-evaluation.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/12/01/automatic-evaluation.aspx</id><published>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Melissa J. Ferguson and Vivian Zayas &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Humans continuously evaluate aspects of their environment (people,
objects, places) in an automatic fashion (i.e., unintentionally,
rapidly). Such evaluations can be highly adaptive, triggering
behavioral responses away from threats and toward rewards in the
environment. Even in the absence of immediate threats and fleeting
rewards, the ability to automatically evaluate aspects of the
environment enables individuals to effortlessly make sense of their
world without depleting limited and valuable cognitive resources. We
discuss two lines of research on automatic evaluation: The first
demonstrates that people can evaluate a stimulus even when they are not
conscious of the stimulus and thus unaware of having evaluated it. The
second line of work shows that even when people are conscious of a
stimulus, they may evaluate it without intending to do so. We end by
discussing current theoretical questions regarding this topic.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Read the &lt;a href="http://web.ebscohost.com.proxy.uchicago.edu/ehost/detail?vid=1&amp;amp;hid=6&amp;amp;sid=fed85f77-6260-4f33-9d00-99bce02fa3a2%40sessionmgr13&amp;amp;bdata=JmxvZ2lucGFnZT1Mb2dpbi5hc3Amc2l0ZT1laG9zdC1saXZlJnNjb3BlPXNpdGU%3d#db=aph&amp;amp;AN=45632533"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Photo from&lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/moriza/1090907562/"&gt; Flickr Creative Commons.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=743" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /><category term="intelligence" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/intelligence/default.aspx" /><category term="cognition" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/cognition/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>    The Process of Personal Change Through Reading Fictional Narratives: Implications for Psychotherapy Practice and Theory.</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/12/01/the-process-of-personal-change-through-reading-fictional-narratives-implications-for-psychotherapy-practice-and-theory.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/12/01/the-process-of-personal-change-through-reading-fictional-narratives-implications-for-psychotherapy-practice-and-theory.aspx</id><published>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Heidi M. Levitt, Woraporn Rattanasampan, Sean Suwichit, Caroline Stanley, Tamara Robinson&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This qualitative study provides an understanding of how and when
individuals experience transformational change as a consequence of
reading narratives. Six participants who attributed significant
personal changes to reading were recruited and interviewed. The
investigators used grounded theory method to analyze these interviews
and identify processes through which change unfolded. The core category
of the analysis was identification with characters&amp;#39; experiences created
a safe venue to consider threat and experiment with new possibilities
and perspectives. Empathizing with protagonists enabled readers to
integrate new modes of responding to personally difficult situations.
Implications for bibliotherapy and narrative therapy are discussed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://web.ebscohost.com.proxy.uchicago.edu/ehost/detail?vid=1&amp;amp;hid=6&amp;amp;sid=c8331220-e623-466a-b45f-ecc52d35bbfd%40sessionmgr4&amp;amp;bdata=JmxvZ2lucGFnZT1Mb2dpbi5hc3Amc2l0ZT1laG9zdC1saXZlJnNjb3BlPXNpdGU%3d#db=aph&amp;amp;AN=45367638"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Photo from&lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/dhammza/91435718/"&gt; Flickr Creative Commons&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=744" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /><category term="intelligence" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/intelligence/default.aspx" /><category term="practical wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/practical+wisdom/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>The ‘return to community’</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/15/the-return-to-community.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/15/the-return-to-community.aspx</id><published>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Barbara Fawcett, Maurice Hanlon&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In Australia and the United Kingdom over the past two decades,&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;the way human service professionals have been involved in ‘communities’,&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;whether defined by ‘place’, ‘interest’&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;or ‘exclusion’, has varied with the political complexion&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;of the government in power. This has resulted in both opportunities&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;for and constraints on human services practice and community&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;participation. In this article, the terminology and the conceptual&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;frames associated with work both in and with communities are&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;critically scrutinized. However, it is also contended that spatial&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;analysis and social entrepreneurship can enable those working&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;in the field to respond productively to the New Public Management&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;and ‘Third Way’ approaches that have shaped the&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;policy context of human services practice. It is argued that&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;a form of spatial analysis and of social entrepreneurship can&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;be used to facilitate meaningful participation in decision-making&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;processes in a variety of communities and to re-forge social&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;connections at a range of levels.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://jos.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/45/4/433"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=748" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /><category term="leadership" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/leadership/default.aspx" /><category term="ethics" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/ethics/default.aspx" /><category term="organizational behavior" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/organizational+behavior/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>A Social Representations Approach To The Communication Between Different Spheres: An Analysis Of The Impacts Of Two Discursive Formats</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/15/a-social-representations-approach-to-the-communication-between-different-spheres-an-analysis-of-the-impacts-of-two-discursive-formats.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/15/a-social-representations-approach-to-the-communication-between-different-spheres-an-analysis-of-the-impacts-of-two-discursive-formats.aspx</id><published>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Susana Batel and Paula Castro&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This paper discusses the potential of the notions of &lt;span class="i"&gt;reification&lt;/span&gt; and &lt;span class="i"&gt;consensualization&lt;/span&gt;
as developed by the theory of social representations as analytical
tools for addressing the communication between the lay and scientific
spheres. Social Representations Theory started by offering an
over-sharp distinction between the reified and the consensual universes
of which science and common sense, respectively, were presented as
paradigmatic. This paper, however, suggests that the notions of &lt;span class="i"&gt;consensual&lt;/span&gt; and &lt;span class="i"&gt;reified&lt;/span&gt; can be considered as describing two distinct communicative formats: &lt;span class="i"&gt;reification&lt;/span&gt; implying the use of arguments which establish prescriptions for representations and action, and &lt;span class="i"&gt;consensualization&lt;/span&gt;
relying on arguments which recognize the heterogeneity of
representation and action. We illustrate this proposal through the
analysis of a case in which the expert and the lay spheres of a Lisbon
neighborhood opposed each other regarding the new laws of public
participation in community matters. This analysis showed how &lt;span class="i"&gt;reification&lt;/span&gt; and &lt;span class="i"&gt;consensualization&lt;/span&gt; can be used as discursive formats by both spheres. The implications of the use of &lt;span class="i"&gt;reification&lt;/span&gt; and &lt;span class="i"&gt;consensualization&lt;/span&gt; and how they may depend on several power resources and have different impacts on social change are discussed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www3.interscience.wiley.com.proxy.uchicago.edu/journal/122516118/abstract"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=749" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="culture" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/culture/default.aspx" /><category term="practical wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/practical+wisdom/default.aspx" /><category term="ethics" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/ethics/default.aspx" /><category term="organizational behavior" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/organizational+behavior/default.aspx" /><category term="knowledge" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/knowledge/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Distinguishing the Power of Agency from Agentic Power: A Note on Weber and the "Black Box" of Personal Agency</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/15/distinguishing-the-power-of-agency-from-agentic-power-a-note-on-weber-and-the-quot-black-box-quot-of-personal-agency.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/15/distinguishing-the-power-of-agency-from-agentic-power-a-note-on-weber-and-the-quot-black-box-quot-of-personal-agency.aspx</id><published>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Colin Campbell&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="i"&gt;The concept of agency, although central to many
sociological debates, has remained frustratingly elusive to pin down.
This article is an attempt to open up what has been called the &amp;quot;black
box&amp;quot; of personal agency by distinguishing clearly between two
contrasting conceptions of the phenomenon. These two conceptions are
very apparent in the manner in which the concept is defined in
sociological reference works, resembling as it does a similar contrast
in the treatment of the concept of power. The two are referred to as
type 1 and type 2 or the power of agency as compared with agentic
power, the essential contrast being that the first refers to an actor&amp;#39;s
ability to initiate and maintain a program of action while the second
refers to an actor&amp;#39;s ability to act independently of the constraining
power of social structure. The nature of these two forms of personal
agency is then illustrated by referring to material taken from Weber&amp;#39;s essay &lt;span class="roman"&gt;The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism,&lt;/span&gt;
this essay itself being understood as an argument that focuses on the
crucial role played by an increase in the power of agency in ushering
in the modern world. Finally, it is argued that these two conceptions
of agency possess no given logical relationship with each other, it
being perfectly possible for individuals to be possessed of
considerable power of agency while lacking agentic power, and vice
versa. It is therefore concluded that it is important, in all
discussions of human agency, to distinguish clearly between these two
forms&lt;/span&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www3.interscience.wiley.com.proxy.uchicago.edu/journal/123189872/abstract"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=750" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="Wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/Wisdom/default.aspx" /><category term="wisdom-related knowledge" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/wisdom-related+knowledge/default.aspx" /><category term="practical wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/practical+wisdom/default.aspx" /><category term="virtue" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/virtue/default.aspx" /><category term="ethics" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/ethics/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Does Habitus Matter? A Comparative Review of Bourdieu's Habitus and Simon's Bounded Rationality with Some Implications for Economic Sociology</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/15/does-habitus-matter-a-comparative-review-of-bourdieu-s-habitus-and-simon-s-bounded-rationality-with-some-implications-for-economic-sociology.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/15/does-habitus-matter-a-comparative-review-of-bourdieu-s-habitus-and-simon-s-bounded-rationality-with-some-implications-for-economic-sociology.aspx</id><published>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Francois Collet&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="i"&gt;In this article, I revisit Pierre Bourdieu&amp;#39;s concept of
habitus and contrast it with Herbert Simon&amp;#39;s notion of bounded
rationality. Through a discussion of the literature of economic
sociology on status and Fligstein&amp;#39;s political-cultural approach, I
argue that this concept can be a source of fresh insights into
empirical problems. I find that the greater the change in the social
environment, the more salient the benefits of using habitus as a tool
to analyze agents&amp;#39; behavior.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www3.interscience.wiley.com.proxy.uchicago.edu/journal/123189871/abstract"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=751" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="Wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/Wisdom/default.aspx" /><category term="social psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/social+psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="behavior" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/behavior/default.aspx" /><category term="leadership" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/leadership/default.aspx" /><category term="practical wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/practical+wisdom/default.aspx" /><category term="ethics" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/ethics/default.aspx" /><category term="free will" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/free+will/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Nameless + harmless = blameless: When seemingly irrelevant factors influence judgment of (un)ethical behavior</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/06/nameless-harmless-blameless-when-seemingly-irrelevant-factors-influence-judgment-of-un-ethical-behavior.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/06/nameless-harmless-blameless-when-seemingly-irrelevant-factors-influence-judgment-of-un-ethical-behavior.aspx</id><published>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;b&gt;&lt;b&gt;Francesca Gino, Lisa L. Shu and Max H. Bazerman&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;People often make judgments about the ethicality of others’ behaviors
and then decide how harshly to punish such behaviors. When they make
these judgments and decisions, sometimes the victims of the unethical
behavior are identifiable, and sometimes they are not. In addition, in
our uncertain world, sometimes an unethical action causes harm, and
sometimes it does not. We argue that a rational assessment of
ethicality should not depend on the identifiability of the victim of
wrongdoing or the actual harm caused if the judge and the decision
maker have the same information. Yet in five laboratory studies, we
show that these factors have a systematic effect on how people judge
the ethicality of the perpetrator of an unethical action. Our studies
show that people judge behavior as more unethical when: (1)
identifiable vs. unidentifiable victims are involved and (2) the
behavior leads to a negative rather than a positive outcome. We also
find that people’s willingness to punish wrongdoers is consistent with
their judgments, and we offer preliminary evidence on how to reduce
these biases. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;See the &lt;a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&amp;amp;_udi=B6WP2-4XTYD17-1&amp;amp;_user=5745&amp;amp;_rdoc=1&amp;amp;_fmt=&amp;amp;_orig=search&amp;amp;_sort=d&amp;amp;_docanchor=&amp;amp;view=c&amp;amp;_acct=C000001358&amp;amp;_version=1&amp;amp;_urlVersion=0&amp;amp;_userid=5745&amp;amp;md5=83c0b18211225a1cbc0fc11a37ca3894"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=695" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /><category term="virtue" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/virtue/default.aspx" /><category term="ethics" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/ethics/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>The Problem of Single-Party Predominance in an Unconsolidated Democracy: The Example of Argentina</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/06/the-problem-of-single-party-predominance-in-an-unconsolidated-democracy-the-example-of-argentina.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/06/the-problem-of-single-party-predominance-in-an-unconsolidated-democracy-the-example-of-argentina.aspx</id><published>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Leslie E. Anderson &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Parties can be a crucial to democratic function but not all parties or
party systems are democratic. Some parties are fully competitive within
a pluralist system while others, notably hegemonic parties, are
antithetical to democracy. Between competitive, pluralist party systems
and hegemonic party systems lie predominant party systems. These are
compatible with democracy where democracy is fully consolidated but
inhibit democratic consolidation in settings with an authoritarian
history or where the rule of law is incomplete. The effect of
predominant parties in unconsolidated democracies has not been fully
studied in comparative context. I scrutinize this problem in Argentina,
which has followed an electoral calendar for two decades, but lacks a
fully pluralist system of power-sharing among two
nationally-competitive parties. The authoritarian background of
Peronism, of Argentina itself and the limited competitive potential of
the Radical Party have curtailed democratic development. The article
underscores the seriousness of Argentina&amp;#39;s dilemma by contrasting its
situation with Democratic Party predominance in the United States Deep
South in the 1940s. The comparison of democratic development in an
older democracy with that of a newer democracy illustrates that some of
the processes of consolidation are similar and that the experience of
older democracies may indicate possible solutions for newer democracies.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Read the &lt;a href="http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&amp;amp;aid=6677140&amp;amp;fulltextType=RA&amp;amp;fileId=S1537592709991794.#"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=696" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="Wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/Wisdom/default.aspx" /><category term="practical wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/practical+wisdom/default.aspx" /><category term="political science" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/political+science/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Public Intellectuality: Academies of Exhibition and the New Disciplinary Secession</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/15/public-intellectuality-academies-of-exhibition-and-the-new-disciplinary-secession.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/15/public-intellectuality-academies-of-exhibition-and-the-new-disciplinary-secession.aspx</id><published>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Patricia Mooney Nickel &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Painting in fin-de-siècle Vienna, like public intellectuality in fin-de-siècle America, was an act of portrayal at a time when artists then, like intellectuals today, composed in an environment characterized by rapid technological change, conservatism, and a government bureaucracy that attempted to pre-empt individual decisions about everyday life. In Vienna this environment was coupled with a public which &amp;quot;was nothing if not conservative. Not only the new, the unfamiliar, but also the great was to be distrusted… Add to which, there was a certain delight in the persecution of the great…&amp;quot; $ Public hostility to counter-portrayals of reality was reinforced by bureaucracies for whom, &amp;quot;the unforeseen, the irrational was excluded; not only the administrative, but also the academic and cultural institutions of the capital ossified beyond any possibility of change…&amp;quot; 5 Intellectual visions of alternatives are likewise judged to be extraneous in fin-de-siècle America, where a letter to The Economist in December 2008 charged that &amp;quot;Academics of all persuasions are where they are today because they believe they know better than anyone else how things should work. Whether many are capable of actually making the world work is quite another issue. The difficulties we face now are not academic; they are real public-policy problems.&amp;quot; 6 &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/theory_and_event/v012/12.4.nickel.html#img01"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=760" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="culture" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/culture/default.aspx" /><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /><category term="social psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/social+psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="leadership" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/leadership/default.aspx" /><category term="practical wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/practical+wisdom/default.aspx" /><category term="virtue" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/virtue/default.aspx" /><category term="ethics" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/ethics/default.aspx" /><category term="organizational behavior" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/organizational+behavior/default.aspx" /><category term="knowledge" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/knowledge/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Philosophical Pitfalls: The Methods Debate in American Political Science</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/02/18/philosophical-pitfalls-the-methods-debate-in-american-political-science.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/02/18/philosophical-pitfalls-the-methods-debate-in-american-political-science.aspx</id><published>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Nivien Saleh&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Positivism dominates research in U.S. political science. I will show that even though&lt;br /&gt;critical realism is virtually unknown in the discipline, realist concepts have found their&lt;br /&gt;way into debates among qualitative methodologists. The analysis begins with a&lt;br /&gt;juxtaposition of positivist and realist foundations. Next, I will trace the methodology&lt;br /&gt;debate that has unfolded in the U.S., examining in what ways it reflects these&lt;br /&gt;foundational assumptions. Over the last number of years, I demonstrate, qualitative&lt;br /&gt;methodologists have engaged in philosophical hybridity, because they have drawn on&lt;br /&gt;realist concepts while continuing to adhere to an empiricist ontology. This kind of cherry-&lt;br /&gt;picking is a perilous strategy, and I suggest that methodologists examine their ontological&lt;br /&gt;assumptions, especially their views on causation. To do so, they need to engage critical&lt;br /&gt;realism. This exercise would benefit political science, because it would provide scholars&lt;br /&gt;with exciting new research possibilities. Moreover, critical realism is well-suited to&lt;br /&gt;support the discipline’s central quest: gaining insight into the world by using few&lt;br /&gt;examined cases to draw inferences to larger sets of unexamined cases.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www.jiss.org/articles/"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=808" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="PHILOSOPHY" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/PHILOSOPHY/default.aspx" /><category term="ethics" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/ethics/default.aspx" /><category term="organizational behavior" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/organizational+behavior/default.aspx" /><category term="political science" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/political+science/default.aspx" /><category term="knowledge" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/knowledge/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>What’s Wrong With Science? Towards a People’s Rational Science of Delight and Compassion.</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/02/01/what-s-wrong-with-science-towards-a-people-s-rational-science-of-delight-and-compassion.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/02/01/what-s-wrong-with-science-towards-a-people-s-rational-science-of-delight-and-compassion.aspx</id><published>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;By Nicholas Maxwell. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What ought to be the aims of science? How can science best serve humanity? What would an ideal science be like, a science that is sensitively and humanely responsive to the needs, problems and aspirations of people? How ought the institutional enterprise of science to be related to the rest of society? What ought to be the relationship between science and art, knowledge and wisdom, thought and feeling, reason and desire, mind and heart? Should the social sciences model themselves on the natural sciences: or ought they to take a different form if they are to serve the interests of humanity objectively, sensitively and rigorously? Might it be possible to get into human life, into art, education, politics, industry, international affairs, and other domains of human activity, the same kind of progressive success that is found so strikingly, on the intellectual level, within science? These are some of the questions tackled by What’s Wrong With Science? &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read&lt;a href="http://www.pentirepress.plus.com/"&gt; the article.&amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=797" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Cait</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/Cait.aspx</uri></author><category term="wisdom-related knowledge" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/wisdom-related+knowledge/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Contextualized self: When the self runs into social dilemmas</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/02/12/contextualized-self-when-the-self-runs-into-social-dilemmas.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/02/12/contextualized-self-when-the-self-runs-into-social-dilemmas.aspx</id><published>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">
&lt;div class="abstract"&gt;Chang-Jiang Liu,
Shu Li&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="abstract"&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="abstract"&gt;Research on the construction of self and of others has indicated that
the way that individuals construe themselves and others exerts an
important influence on their cognition, emotion, and even behavior. The
present study extends this line of research to mixed-motive situations
in which short-term individual and long-term collective interests are
at odds. In addition, this study associates the importance of context
interdependence, and specifically its interaction with independent
self-construal, with an individual&amp;#39;s cooperative behavior. We used a
priming task to manipulate the level of self-construal and also
manipulated the degree of interdependent context by giving participants
a chance to assign rewards either to their group members or to
themselves alone. The results showed that when participants received
interdependent (as opposed to independent) self-construal priming, they
consistently contributed highly, regardless of context manipulation. In
contrast, those primed with an independent self-construal contributed
less in the investment game, but only when placed in a context where
group members were encouraged to think about their individual (versus
mutual) fate. In this situation they contributed the least to the group
in the game. These findings indicate that independent self-construal in
a low interdependence context produces the most competitive behavior.
The results also showed that how participants felt about their
interaction with other group members mediated the effect of context
interdependence on cooperative behavior, and possibly that was
especially the case for independent self-construal. The results
demonstrate that the self can be contextualized and embedded in the
social contexts and symbolic systems within which people live.
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content%7Edb=all%7Econtent=a909315521"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=785" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /><category term="social psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/social+psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="behavior" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/behavior/default.aspx" /><category term="cognition" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/cognition/default.aspx" /><category term="practical wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/practical+wisdom/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>The Evolution of Misbelief</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/12/01/the-evolution-of-misbelief.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/12/01/the-evolution-of-misbelief.aspx</id><published>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ryan T. McKay, Daniel C. Dennett&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;From an evolutionary standpoint, a default presumption is that true
beliefs are adaptive and misbeliefs maladaptive. But if humans are
biologically engineered to appraise the world accurately and to form
true beliefs, how are we to explain the routine exceptions to this
rule? How can we account for mistaken beliefs, bizarre delusions, and
instances of self-deception? We explore this question in some detail.
We begin by articulating a distinction between two general types of
misbelief: those resulting from a breakdown in the normal functioning
of the belief formation system (e.g., delusions) and those arising in
the normal course of that system&amp;#39;s operations (e.g., beliefs based on
incomplete or inaccurate information). The former are instances of
biological dysfunction or pathology, reflecting “culpable” limitations
of evolutionary design. Although the latter category includes
undesirable (but tolerable) by-products of “forgivably” limited design,
our quarry is a contentious subclass of this category: misbeliefs best
conceived as design features. Such misbeliefs, unlike occasional lucky
falsehoods, would have been systematically adaptive in the evolutionary
past. Such misbeliefs, furthermore, would not be reducible to judicious
– but doxastically noncommittal – action policies. Finally,
such misbeliefs would have been adaptive in themselves, constituting
more than mere by-products of adaptively biased misbelief-producing
systems. We explore a range of potential candidates for evolved
misbelief, and conclude that, of those surveyed, only &lt;i&gt;positive illusions&lt;/i&gt; meet our criteria.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&amp;amp;aid=7159848&amp;amp;fulltextType=RA&amp;amp;fileId=S0140525X09990975"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Photo from &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/creativecommons/"&gt;Flickr Creative Commons.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;u&gt;&amp;quot;Can Do&amp;quot; Attitudes: Some Positive Illusions Are Not Misbeliefs &lt;/u&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Owen Flanagan&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;McKay &amp;amp; Dennett (M&amp;amp;D) argue that positive illusions are a
plausible candidate for a class of evolutionarily “selected for”
misbeliefs. I argue (Flanagan 1991; 2007) that the class of alleged
positive illusions is a hodge-podge, and that some of its members are
best understood as positive attitudes, hopes, and the like, not as
beliefs at all.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read this &lt;a href="http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&amp;amp;aid=7160160&amp;amp;fulltextType=RA&amp;amp;fileId=S0140525X09991439"&gt;reply&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;u&gt;Adaptive Misbelief or Judicious Pragmatic Acceptance?&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="contrib"&gt;Keith Frankish&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="AbsType"&gt;This commentary highlights the distinction between
belief and pragmatic acceptance, and asks whether the positive
illusions discussed in section 13 of the target article may be
judicious pragmatic acceptances rather than adaptive misbeliefs. I
discuss the characteristics of pragmatic acceptance and make
suggestions about how to determine whether positive illusions are
attitudes of this type.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="AbsType"&gt;Read this &lt;a href="http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&amp;amp;aid=7159932&amp;amp;fulltextType=RA&amp;amp;fileId=S0140525X0999121X"&gt;reply&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="AbsType"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="AbsType"&gt;&lt;u&gt;Why We Don&amp;#39;t Need Built-in Misbeliefs&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="AbsType"&gt;&lt;span class="contrib"&gt;Carol S. Dweck&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="AbsType"&gt;In this commentary, I question the idea that
positive illusions are evolved misbeliefs on the grounds that positive
illusions are often maladaptive, are not universal, and may be
by-products of existing mechanisms. Further, because different beliefs
are adaptive in different situations and cultures, it makes sense to
build in a readiness to form beliefs rather than the beliefs themselves.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="AbsType"&gt;Read this &lt;a href="http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&amp;amp;aid=7160148&amp;amp;fulltextType=RA&amp;amp;fileId=S0140525X09991427"&gt;reply&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="AbsType"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="AbsType"&gt;&lt;u&gt;Positive Illusions and Positive Collusions: How Social Life Abets Self-Enhancing Beliefs&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="AbsType"&gt;&lt;span class="contrib"&gt;Jonathon D. Brown&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="AbsType"&gt;Most people hold overly (though not excessively)
positive self-views of themselves, their ability to shape environmental
events, and their future. These positive illusions are generally
(though not always) beneficial, promoting achievement, psychological
adjustment, and physical well-being. Social processes conspire to
produce these illusions, suggesting that affiliation patterns may have
evolved to nurture and sustain them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="AbsType"&gt;Read this &lt;a href="http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&amp;amp;aid=7159896&amp;amp;fulltextType=RA&amp;amp;fileId=S0140525X0999118X"&gt;reply&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="AbsType"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="AbsType"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="AbsType"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="AbsType"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;h2 class="ArtTtl"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=786" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="evolution" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/evolution/default.aspx" /><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /><category term="social psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/social+psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="cognition" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/cognition/default.aspx" /><category term="biology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/biology/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Non-instrumental belief is largely founded on singularity</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/02/12/non-instrumental-belief-is-largely-founded-on-singularity.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/02/12/non-instrumental-belief-is-largely-founded-on-singularity.aspx</id><published>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;George Ainslie &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="AbsType"&gt;The radical evolutionary step that divides
human decision-making from that of nonhumans is the ability to excite
the reward process for its own sake, in imagination. Combined with
hyperbolic over-valuation of the present, this ability is a potential
threat to both the individual&amp;#39;s long term survival and the natural
selection of high intelligence. Human belief is intrinsically
“unfounded” or under-founded, which may or may not be adaptive.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="AbsType"&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&amp;amp;aid=7159872&amp;amp;fulltextType=RA&amp;amp;fileId=S0140525X09991154"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=787" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="evolution" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/evolution/default.aspx" /><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /><category term="intelligence" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/intelligence/default.aspx" /><category term="cognition" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/cognition/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Extending the range of adaptive misbelief: Memory “distortions” as functional features</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/02/12/extending-the-range-of-adaptive-misbelief-memory-distortions-as-functional-features.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/02/12/extending-the-range-of-adaptive-misbelief-memory-distortions-as-functional-features.aspx</id><published>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Pascal Boyer&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A large amount of research in cognitive psychology is focused on memory
distortions, understood as deviations from various (largely implicit)
standards. Many alleged distortions actually suggest a highly
functional system that balances the cost of acquiring new information
with the benefit of relevant, contextually appropriate decision-making.
In this sense many memories may be examples of functionally adaptive
misbelief.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&amp;amp;aid=7160112&amp;amp;fulltextType=RA&amp;amp;fileId=S0140525X09991397"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=788" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /><category term="behavior" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/behavior/default.aspx" /><category term="cognition" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/cognition/default.aspx" /><category term="practical wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/practical+wisdom/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>    Emotional Reactivity Across the Adult Life Span: The Cognitive Pragmatics Make a Difference</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/03/03/emotional-reactivity-across-the-adult-life-span-the-cognitive-pragmatics-make-a-difference.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/03/03/emotional-reactivity-across-the-adult-life-span-the-cognitive-pragmatics-make-a-difference.aspx</id><published>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-12-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Ute Kunzmann and David Richter&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Previously, we found that during films about age-typical losses, older
adults experienced greater sadness than young adults, whereas their
physiological responses were just as large. In the present study, our
goal was to replicate this finding and extend past work by examining
the role of cognitive functioning in age differences in emotional
reactivity. We measured the autonomic and subjective responses of 240
adults (age range = 20 to 70) while they viewed films about age-typical
losses from our previous work. Findings were fully supportive of our
past work: The magnitude of subjective reactions to our films increased
linearly over the adult years, whereas there were no age differences on
the level of physiological reactivity. We also found that the
subjective reactions of adults with high pragmatic intelligence were of
moderate size independent of their own age or the age relevance of the
emotion elicitor. In contrast, the subjective reactions of adults low
on pragmatic intelligence were more variable. Together, this evidence
suggests that research on age differences in emotional reactivity may
benefit from a perspective that considers individual difference
variables as well as contextual variations.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read &lt;a href="http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=browsePA.volumes&amp;amp;jcode=pag"&gt;the article. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=824" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="cognition" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/cognition/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Self-Affirmation Enhances Attentional Bias Toward Threatening Components of a Persuasive Message</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/06/self-affirmation-enhances-attentional-bias-toward-threatening-components-of-a-persuasive-message.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/06/self-affirmation-enhances-attentional-bias-toward-threatening-components-of-a-persuasive-message.aspx</id><published>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;span class="name"&gt;&lt;span class="forenames"&gt;William M.P.&lt;/span&gt;
					&lt;span class="surname"&gt;Klein&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;and &lt;span class="name"&gt;&lt;span class="forenames"&gt;Peter R.&lt;/span&gt;
					&lt;span class="surname"&gt;Harris&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We explored whether self-affirmation enhances attentional bias toward
threatening elements of a persuasive message. Female alcohol consumers
read an article linking alcohol to *** cancer and were then exposed
supraliminally to threat and nonthreat words from the article (as well
as threat and nonthreat words that did not appear in the article).
Among moderately heavy drinkers who were not self-affirmed, there
emerged an attentional bias away from the threatening words in the
article—a result suggesting an avoidant response. However, among
moderately heavy drinkers who were self-affirmed, there was a bias
toward the threatening words. No attentional biases appeared for threat
words not in the message, which suggested that the effect was threat
specific. Moreover, no attentional biases were found among the heaviest
drinkers. Self-affirmation may facilitate targeted implicit processing
of threatening messages, although the effects could attenuate among
individuals engaging in high levels of the behavior featured in the
message.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/122670293/abstract"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=697" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Knowledge and Intellectual Practice in Swahili Context: 'Wisdom' and the Social Dimensions of Knowledge</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/11/01/knowledge-and-intellectualpractice-in-swahili-context-wisdom-and-the-social-dimensions-of-knowledge.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/11/01/knowledge-and-intellectualpractice-in-swahili-context-wisdom-and-the-social-dimensions-of-knowledge.aspx</id><published>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;By Kai Kresse &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This article investigates ‘wisdom’ from an ethnographic perspective that pays attention to the ways in which knowledge is performed, appreciated, negotiated and questioned in everyday life in Mombasa, on the Swahili coast. It discusses the &lt;i&gt;baraza&lt;/i&gt; setting (daily meeting points for male social peers) as a venue for intellectual practice and the appreciation of wisdom. Basic features of communicative interaction identified there can also be found to be in play when looking at case studies of individuals and their performances. The article looks at how two genres (didactic &lt;i&gt;tenzi&lt;/i&gt; poetry and Ramadhan lectures) are used by Swahili intellectuals who are regarded as exceptional in their field. Verbal, performative and social skills are found to be crucial aspects of wisdom, which also has to do with being able to engage with common social concerns in a manner that leads to further insight and intellectual orientation for others. In this sense, social responsibilities and moral obligations in the use of knowledge play an important role. Overall, the article seeks to contribute to a general discussion of wisdom, based on insights gained on the East African coast.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Read &lt;a class="" href="http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/africa_the_journal_of_the_international_african_institute/summary/v079/79.1.kresse01.html"&gt;the article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=677" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Cait</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/Cait.aspx</uri></author><category term="culture" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/culture/default.aspx" /><category term="wisdom-related knowledge" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/wisdom-related+knowledge/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Cognitive Error and Contemplative Practices: The Cultivation of Discernment in Mind and Heart</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/12/01/cognitive-error-and-contemplative-practices-the-cultivation-of-discernment-in-mind-and-heart.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/12/01/cognitive-error-and-contemplative-practices-the-cultivation-of-discernment-in-mind-and-heart.aspx</id><published>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;By Wesley J. Wildman &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Brains are amazing organs in all creatures with central nervous systems and especially in human beings. But they are not perfect. Without forgetting the larger success story of cognitive evolution, I want to explore the way that cognitive biases sometimes produce errors in both religious and secular social settings and how such errors can be diagnosed and corrected when they occur. This will involve noticing that error diagnosis and correction is a process that certain social groups have a vested interest in resisting or neglecting, in some respects, while the very same social groups may furnish resources that support the detection of cognitive errors, in other respects.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This presents a moral quandary for both secular and religious groups. Should we educate children to be fully aware of their cognitive vulnerability to advertising, thereby learning how to resist and eventually become immune to one of the fundamental power sources of modern market economies? Should religious groups explain to young people their cognitive tendencies to posit the action of supernatural beings whether or not any such action exists, even though this may disrupt the power of religious groups to forge bracing social togetherness that supports psychologically useful coping skills? While I do not seek to answer such complex moral questions in this paper, I do argue that knowledge of cognitive biases and the resulting tendencies to cognitive error, self-defeating behaviors, and self-deception should be made available to those individuals and groups who are interested in promoting a high degree of critical self-awareness in the analysis of beliefs and behaviors in both secular and religious contexts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Read &lt;a class="" href="http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/buddhist-christian_studies/summary/v029/29.wildman.html"&gt;the article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=678" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Cait</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/Cait.aspx</uri></author><category term="religion" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/religion/default.aspx" /><category term="cognition" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/cognition/default.aspx" /><category term="knowledge" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/knowledge/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Beholding the Logos: The Church, the Environment, and the Meaning of Man</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/12/01/beholding-the-logos-the-church-the-environment-and-the-meaning-of-man.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/12/01/beholding-the-logos-the-church-the-environment-and-the-meaning-of-man.aspx</id><published>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;By Christopher J. Thompson&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To behold the heavens and gaze upon the infinite expanse of a star-studded sky, indeed to ponder any vista of creation&amp;#39;s splendor is to be drawn not merely into the mystery of creation, the intricacies of cause and effect; rather, to ponder the mystery of things is to be inevitably drawn into the meaning of the human person. The splendor of being thrusts us back upon ourselves and calls us to question the meaning of our own existence. &lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Does our Catholic intellectual tradition help us navigate such questions? Is there a distinctive Catholic voice crying in the wilderness?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Read &lt;a class="" href="http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/logos/summary/v012/12.3.thompson.html"&gt;the article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=679" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Cait</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/Cait.aspx</uri></author><category term="religion" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/religion/default.aspx" /><category term="knowledge" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/knowledge/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Cortex and Memory: Emergence of a New Paradigm</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/11/24/cortex-and-memory-emergence-of-a-new-paradigm.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/11/24/cortex-and-memory-emergence-of-a-new-paradigm.aspx</id><published>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;


	
	
	
	
	
	

&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="margin-bottom:0in;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight:normal;"&gt;Joaquín
M. Fuster&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="margin-bottom:0in;"&gt;Converging evidence from humans and nonhuman primates is obliging us to
abandon conventional models in favor of a radically different,
distributed-network paradigm of cortical memory. Central to the new
paradigm is the concept of memory network or cognit—that is, a memory
or an item of knowledge defined by a pattern of connections between
neuron populations associated by experience. Cognits are hierarchically
organized in terms of semantic abstraction and complexity. Complex
cognits link neurons in noncontiguous cortical areas of prefrontal and
posterior association cortex. Cognits overlap and interconnect
profusely, even across hierarchical levels (heterarchically), whereby a
neuron can be part of many memory networks and thus many memories or
items of knowledge.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="margin-bottom:0in;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;Read &lt;a href="http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1162/jocn.2009.21280"&gt;the article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=667" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="neuroscience" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/neuroscience/default.aspx" /><category term="knowledge" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/knowledge/default.aspx" /><category term="biology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/biology/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Optimal Predictions in Everyday Cognition: The Wisdom of Individuals or Crowds?  </title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/11/01/optimal-predictions-in-everyday-cognition-the-wisdom-of-individuals-or-crowds.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/11/01/optimal-predictions-in-everyday-cognition-the-wisdom-of-individuals-or-crowds.aspx</id><published>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Michael C. Mozer, Harold Pashler and Hadjar Homaei&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Griffiths and Tenenbaum (2006) asked individuals to make predictions
about the duration or extent of everyday events (e.g., cake baking
times), and reported that predictions were optimal, employing Bayesian
inference based on veridical prior distributions. Although the
predictions conformed strikingly to statistics of the world, they
reflect averages over many individuals. On the conjecture that the
accuracy of the group response is chiefly a consequence of aggregating
across individuals, we constructed simple, heuristic approximations to
the Bayesian model premised on the hypothesis that individuals have
access merely to a sample of &lt;i&gt;k&lt;/i&gt; instances drawn from the
relevant distribution. The accuracy of the group response reported by
Griffiths and Tenenbaum could be accounted for by supposing that
individuals each utilize only two instances. Moreover, the variability
of the group data is more consistent with this small-sample hypothesis
than with the hypothesis that people utilize veridical or nearly
veridical representations of the underlying prior distributions. Our
analyses lead to a qualitatively different view of how individuals
reason from past experience than the view espoused by Griffiths and
Tenenbaum.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read &lt;a href="http://www.pashler.com/Articles/MozerPashlerHomaei_2008.pdf"&gt;the article.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Photo from &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/gaspi/79805619/"&gt;Flickr Creative Commons. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=652" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>The Wisdom of Individuals: Exploring People’s  Knowledge About Everyday Events Using  Iterated Learning</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/11/01/the-wisdom-of-individuals-exploring-people-s-knowledge-about-everyday-events-using-iterated-learning.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/11/01/the-wisdom-of-individuals-exploring-people-s-knowledge-about-everyday-events-using-iterated-learning.aspx</id><published>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Stephan Lewandowsky, Thomas L. Grifﬁths, Michael L. Kalish &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Determining the knowledge that guides human judgments is fundamental to understanding how&amp;nbsp; people reason, make decisions, and form predictions. We use an experimental procedure called&amp;nbsp; ‘‘iterated learning,’’ in which the responses that people give on one trial are used to generate the data they see on the next, to pinpoint the knowledge that informs people’s predictions about everyday events (e.g., predicting the total box ofﬁce gross of a movie from its current take). In particular, we use this method to discriminate between two models of human judgments: a simple Bayesian model (Grifﬁths &amp;amp; Tenenbaum, 2006) and a recently proposed alternative model that assumes people store only a few instances of each type of event in memory (MinK; Mozer, Pashler, &amp;amp; Homaei, 2008). Although testing these models using standard experimental procedures is difﬁcult due to differences in the number of free parameters and the need to make assumptions about the knowledge of individual learners, we show that the two models make very different predictions about the outcome of iterated learning. The results of an experiment using this methodology provide a rich picture of how much people know about the distributions of everyday quantities, and they are inconsistent with the predictions of the MinK model. The results suggest that accurate predictions about everyday events reﬂect relatively sophisticated knowledge on the part of individuals. &lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read &lt;a href="http://www.psy.uwa.edu.au/Users%20web%20pages/cogscience/documents/PFcogsci.pdf"&gt;the article. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Photo from &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/wahig/400345874/"&gt;Flickr Creative Commons. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=653" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>The Wisdom of Your Dreams: Using Dreams to Tap into Your Unconscious and Transform Your Life</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/11/13/the-wisdom-of-your-dreams-using-dreams-to-tap-into-your-unconscious-and-transform-your-life.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/11/13/the-wisdom-of-your-dreams-using-dreams-to-tap-into-your-unconscious-and-transform-your-life.aspx</id><published>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Jeremy Taylor&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Renowned dream expert Jeremy Taylor can help you discover how the hidden messages in your dreams can change your life. In The Wisdom of Your Dreams: Using Dreams to Tap Into Your Unconscious and Transform Your Life, Taylor shows us how dreams can be the keys to gaining insight into our past and our conflicts, as well as excursions into the fantastic realm of creative inspiration.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This book provides readers with specific, hands-on techniques to help them remember and interpret their dreams, establish a dream group, and learn the universal symbolism of dreaming.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Full of case histories and a thoughtful chapter about dreams as clues to the evolution of consciousness, this updated, revised and expanded edition of Where People Fly and Water Runs Uphill is a life- changing and potentially world-changing work...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Link to &lt;a href="http://www.tarcherbooks.net/?p=826"&gt;the publisher. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=657" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="Wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/Wisdom/default.aspx" /><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>"I Was a Boy with Power to Talk" (Conf. 1.8.13): Augustine and Ancient Theories of Language Acquisition</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/11/01/quot-i-was-a-boy-with-power-to-talk-quot-conf-1-8-13-augustine-and-ancient-theories-of-language-acquisition.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/11/01/quot-i-was-a-boy-with-power-to-talk-quot-conf-1-8-13-augustine-and-ancient-theories-of-language-acquisition.aspx</id><published>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;By Tarmo Toom&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div id="mainArticle"&gt;
&lt;div class="citationblock"&gt;
&lt;div class="abstract"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This study compares Augustine&amp;#39;s remarks on language acquisition in the Confessions with those of Stoics, Epicureans, and Pyrrhonists and assesses the similarities and differences of the respective accounts. It studies a specific issue in Augustine&amp;#39;s philosophy of language, language acquisition, which so far and in connection with ancient theories has received only passing attention.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Read &lt;a class="" href="http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/journal_of_late_antiquity/summary/v002/2.2.toom.html"&gt;the article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=660" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Cait</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/Cait.aspx</uri></author><category term="PHILOSOPHY" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/PHILOSOPHY/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>The Role of Peer Social Capital in Educational Assimilation of Immigrant Youths</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/15/the-role-of-peer-social-capital-in-educational-assimilation-of-immigrant-youths.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/15/the-role-of-peer-social-capital-in-educational-assimilation-of-immigrant-youths.aspx</id><published>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Igor Ryabov&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The academic achievement of immigrant children has been a focus of
social research for decades. Yet little attention has been paid to peer
social capital and its importance as a school context factor for the
academic success of immigrant youths. Using multilevel data from the
National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Waves 1 and 3), this
article draws upon social capital theory and assimilation theory to
examine the effects of peer social capital on the academic achievement
and attainment of immigrant and native youths. The effects of three
measures of peer social capital are studied, controlled for many
important variables, for example, sociodemographic background
variables, school characteristics, and family social capital. Results
indicate that only the average GPA (grade point average) of peers had a
consistent and significant effect on children&amp;#39;s achievement and
attainment, whereas the density and the homogeneity of the peer network
did not. Furthermore, all three measures of peer social capital have
stronger effects for immigrant youths than for native youths.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www3.interscience.wiley.com.proxy.uchicago.edu/journal/122510723/abstract"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=752" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="culture" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/culture/default.aspx" /><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="social psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/social+psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="intelligence" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/intelligence/default.aspx" /><category term="cognition" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/cognition/default.aspx" /><category term="virtue" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/virtue/default.aspx" /><category term="knowledge" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/knowledge/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Changing Lives, Resistant Institutions: A New Generation Negotiates Gender, Work, and Family Change</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/15/changing-lives-resistant-institutions-a-new-generation-negotiates-gender-work-and-family-change.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/15/changing-lives-resistant-institutions-a-new-generation-negotiates-gender-work-and-family-change.aspx</id><published>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Kathleen Gerson&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="para"&gt;Sociology&amp;#39;s
enduring concern with explaining the links between individual and
social change has never been more relevant. We are poised at a moment
when changing lives are colliding with resistant institutions. These
tensions have created social conflicts and personal dilemmas for women
and men alike. To explain the interplay between lives and institutions
and to develop effective strategies for transcending the impasse
between public demands and private needs, we need a deeper
understanding of how these structural and cultural conflicts play out
in the lives of young women and men. This article proposes a framework
for such an inquiry.&lt;/p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www3.interscience.wiley.com.proxy.uchicago.edu/journal/122649424/abstract"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=753" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="culture" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/culture/default.aspx" /><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /><category term="social psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/social+psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="leadership" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/leadership/default.aspx" /><category term="cognition" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/cognition/default.aspx" /><category term="practical wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/practical+wisdom/default.aspx" /><category term="ethics" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/ethics/default.aspx" /><category term="organizational behavior" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/organizational+behavior/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>The Self-Organization of Explicit Attitudes.</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/14/the-self-organization-of-explicit-attitudes.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/14/the-self-organization-of-explicit-attitudes.aspx</id><published>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Michael T. Wojnowicz, Melissa J. Ferguson, Rick Dale, Michael J. Spivey &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;How do minds produce explicit attitudes over several hundred
milliseconds? Speeded evaluative measures have revealed implicit biases
beyond cognitive control and subjective awareness, yet mental
processing may culminate in an explicit attitude that feels personally
endorsed and corroborates voluntary intentions. We argue that
self-reported explicit attitudes derive from a continuous, temporally
dynamic process, whereby multiple simultaneously conflicting sources of
information self-organize into a meaningful mental representation.
While our participants reported their explicit (like vs. dislike)
attitudes toward White versus Black people by moving a cursor to a
“like” or “dislike” response box, we recorded streaming x- and
y-coordinates from their hand-movement trajectories. We found that
participants&amp;#39; hand-movement paths exhibited greater curvature toward
the “dislike” response when they reported positive explicit attitudes
toward Black people than when they reported positive explicit attitudes
toward White people. Moreover, these trajectories were characterized by
movement disorder and competitive velocity profiles that were predicted
under the assumption that the deliberate attitudes emerged from
continuous interactions between multiple simultaneously conflicting
constraints.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www3.interscience.wiley.com.proxy.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/fulltext/122632000/HTMLSTART?CRETRY=1&amp;amp;SRETRY=0"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=746" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /><category term="cognition" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/cognition/default.aspx" /><category term="practical wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/practical+wisdom/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Sit Back and Enjoy The Ride: Financial planners and the symbolic domination of clients.</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/11/sit-back-and-enjoy-the-ride-financial-planners-and-the-symbolic-domination-of-clients.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/11/sit-back-and-enjoy-the-ride-financial-planners-and-the-symbolic-domination-of-clients.aspx</id><published>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Patrick F. Parnaby&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Borrowing from Bourdieu’s theory of practice, specifically, the
relationship between forms of capital and discourse on the one hand and
the nature of symbolic domination on the other (see Bourdieu 1998;
1991), this paper seeks to answer the following question: what
discursive strategies do personal financial planners use to facilitate
desirable client behavior vis-à-vis market investment? On the basis of
32 semi-structured interviews with financial planners and textual
analyses of relevant industry materials, I argue that planners use
three essential discursive strategies: the naturalization of market
volatility, the establishing of reasonable expectations, and the
managing of external discourses. Together, these discursive strategies
facilitate the symbolic domination of clients while cultivating a
professional relationship amenable to long term investment and
profitability.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/CJS/article/view/5065"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=724" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="social psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/social+psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="PHILOSOPHY" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/PHILOSOPHY/default.aspx" /><category term="ethics" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/ethics/default.aspx" /><category term="organizational behavior" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/organizational+behavior/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Free time as a necessary condition of free life</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/11/free-time-as-a-necessary-condition-of-free-life.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/11/free-time-as-a-necessary-condition-of-free-life.aspx</id><published>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jeff&amp;nbsp;Noonan &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Human life is finite. Given that lifetime is necessarily limited, the
experience of time in any given society is a central ethical problem.
If all or most of human lifetime is consumed by routine tasks (or
resting for the resumption of routine) then human beings are dominated
by the socially determined experience of time. This article first
examines time as the fundamental existential framework of human life.
It then goes on to explore the determination of time today by the
ruling value system that underlies advanced capitalist society. It
concludes that the equation &amp;#39;time is money&amp;#39; rules the contemporary
experience of time, and goes on to argue that this experience deprives
those who live under this ruling value system of a central requirement
of free human life: the experience of time as an open matrix of
possibilities for action (or free time).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www.palgrave-journals.com/cpt/journal/v8/n4/abs/cpt200827a.html"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=729" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="wisdom-related knowledge" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/wisdom-related+knowledge/default.aspx" /><category term="practical wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/practical+wisdom/default.aspx" /><category term="virtue" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/virtue/default.aspx" /><category term="ethics" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/ethics/default.aspx" /><category term="political science" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/political+science/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>The Mafioso Case: Autonomy and Self-respect </title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/15/the-mafioso-case-autonomy-and-self-respect.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/15/the-mafioso-case-autonomy-and-self-respect.aspx</id><published>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Carla Bagnoli&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This article argues that immoralists do not fully enjoy autonomous
agency because they are not capable of engaging in the proper form of
practical reflection, which requires relating to others as having equal
standing. An adequate diagnosis of the immoralist’s failure of agential
authority requires a relational account of reflexivity and autonomy.
This account has the distinctive merit of identifying the cost of
disregarding moral obligations and of showing how immoralists may
become susceptible to practical reason. The compelling quality of
reason should not be represented as the capacity to force them to abide
by morality on pain of incoherence. Rather, its authority (and
objectivity) is shown when it presents them with the prospect of a
transition that makes sense for them to undertake.&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www.springerlink.com/content/wum773v04745r56j/?p=151f231e67f949ebaa0f335f82c3cc93&amp;amp;pi=3"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=758" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="Wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/Wisdom/default.aspx" /><category term="wisdom-related knowledge" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/wisdom-related+knowledge/default.aspx" /><category term="practical wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/practical+wisdom/default.aspx" /><category term="PHILOSOPHY" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/PHILOSOPHY/default.aspx" /><category term="ethics" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/ethics/default.aspx" /><category term="knowledge" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/knowledge/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Responsibility and the Brain Sciences </title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/15/responsibility-and-the-brain-sciences.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/15/responsibility-and-the-brain-sciences.aspx</id><published>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Felipe&amp;nbsp;De&amp;nbsp;Brigard, Eric&amp;nbsp;Mandelbaum, David&amp;nbsp;Ripley &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Some theorists think that the more we get to know about the neural
underpinnings of our behaviors, the less likely we will be to hold
people responsible for their actions. This intuition has driven some to
suspect that as neuroscience gains insight into the neurological causes
of our actions, people will cease to view others as morally responsible
for their actions, thus creating a troubling quandary for our legal
system. This paper provides empirical evidence against such intuitions.
Particularly, our studies of folk intuitions suggest that (1) when the
causes of an action are described in neurological terms, they are not
found to be any more exculpatory than when described in psychological
terms, and (2) agents are not held fully responsible even for actions
that are fully neurologically caused. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www.springerlink.com/content/a106790m4t421pv3/?p=151f231e67f949ebaa0f335f82c3cc93&amp;amp;pi=5"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=759" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /><category term="social psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/social+psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="intelligence" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/intelligence/default.aspx" /><category term="practical wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/practical+wisdom/default.aspx" /><category term="neuroscience" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/neuroscience/default.aspx" /><category term="ethics" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/ethics/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>The Institutional Production of National Science in the 20th Century</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/06/the-institutional-production-of-national-science-in-the-20th-century.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/06/the-institutional-production-of-national-science-in-the-20th-century.aspx</id><published>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Emilio J. Castillo&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Science and scientific production have been widely promoted&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;as powerful tools for advancing national economic and social&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;development. While much progress has been made in determining&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;whether this is the case, less understood are the underlying&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;factors influencing national scientific activity in the first&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;place, especially during its 20th-century global expansion.&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;In order to advance our understanding of the development of&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;science and world polity, this study investigates in-depth when&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;and under what functional and institutional conditions countries&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;chose to join any of the scientific unions comprising the ICSU,&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;the pre-eminent and oldest international science institution&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;in the world. According to analyses of historical data for 166&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;countries from 1919 to 1990, functional arguments are only important&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;predictors of the rate at which nation-states join scientific&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;organizations early in the ‘science diffusion’ process.&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;After 1945, institutional factors best account for worldwide&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;national scientific activity: The joining rate increases more&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;quickly during the post-Second World War era with the rise of&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;the world system. This article also provides evidence of both&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;convergence in the evolution of national scientific activities&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;and of the great invariability in the impact of functional and&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;institutional factors for core and peripheral countries over&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;time. The article concludes by discussing the implications of&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;this research for the future study of national scientific production&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;and development in the world.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://iss.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/24/6/833"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=700" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="social psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/social+psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="organizational behavior" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/organizational+behavior/default.aspx" /><category term="history of science" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/history+of+science/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Taken on Faith? The Impact of Uncertainty, Knowledge Relatedness, and Richness of Information on Entrepreneurial Opportunity Exploitation</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/06/taken-on-faith-the-impact-of-uncertainty-knowledge-relatedness-and-richness-of-information-on-entrepreneurial-opportunity-exploitation.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/06/taken-on-faith-the-impact-of-uncertainty-knowledge-relatedness-and-richness-of-information-on-entrepreneurial-opportunity-exploitation.aspx</id><published>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Matthew S. Wood, J. Michael Pearson&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This article develops a theoretical model that suggests that&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;differential levels of uncertainty, knowledge relatedness, and&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;richness of information will have a substantial impact on the&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;decision to engage in entrepreneurship. Effects of the individual&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;differences fear of failure and general self-efficacy are also&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;considered. Using a metric conjoint methodology, respondents&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;are asked to evaluate a series of profiles with different levels&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;of each attribute and then indicate their willingness to invest&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;in an entrepreneurial opportunity. This approach allows for&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;the calculation of main and interaction effects as well as the&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;importance of each factor in the investment decision. Results&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;indicated that all three factors and their interactions play&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;a significant role in the decision to engage in entrepreneurial&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;action. The degree of opportunity-related uncertainty was found&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;to be the most important factor in the decision-making process.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://jlo.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/16/2/117"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=704" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /><category term="leadership" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/leadership/default.aspx" /><category term="wisdom-related knowledge" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/wisdom-related+knowledge/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>The scent of supercolonies: the discovery, synthesis and behavioural verification of ant colony recognition cues</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/11/01/the-scent-of-supercolonies-the-discovery-synthesis-and-behavioural-verification-of-ant-colony-recognition-cues.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/11/01/the-scent-of-supercolonies-the-discovery-synthesis-and-behavioural-verification-of-ant-colony-recognition-cues.aspx</id><published>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Miriam Brandt, Ellen van Wilgenburg, Robert Sulc, Kenneth J Shea and Neil D Tsutsui (wisdom grantee)

&lt;/p&gt;&lt;h4&gt;Background&lt;/h4&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ants form highly social and cooperative colonies that compete, and
often fight, against other such colonies, both intra- and
interspecifically. Some invasive ants take sociality to an extreme,
forming geographically massive &amp;#39;supercolonies&amp;#39; across thousands of
kilometres. The success of social insects generally, as well as
invasive ants in particular, stems from the sophisticated mechanisms
used to accurately and precisely distinguish colonymates from
non-colonymates. Surprisingly, however, the specific chemicals used for
this recognition are virtually undescribed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h4&gt;Results&lt;/h4&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here, we report the discovery, chemical synthesis and behavioural
testing of the colonymate recognition cues used by the widespread and
invasive Argentine ant (Linepithema humile). By synthesizing pure
versions of these chemicals in the laboratory and testing them in
behavioural assays, we show that these compounds trigger aggression
among normally amicable nestmates, but control hydrocarbons do not.
Furthermore, behavioural testing across multiple different
supercolonies reveals that the reaction to individual compounds varies
from colony to colony -- the expected reaction to true colony
recognition labels. Our results also show that both quantitative and
qualitative changes to cuticular hydrocarbon profiles can trigger
aggression among nestmates. The data point the way for the development
of new, environmentally-friendly, control strategies based on the
species-specific manipulation of aggressive behaviour. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h4&gt;Conclusions&lt;/h4&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Overall, our findings reveal the identity of specific chemicals used
for colonymate recognition by the invasive Argentine ants. Although the
particular chemicals used by other ants may differ, the patterns
reported here are likely to be true for ants generally. As almost all
invasive ants display widespread unicoloniality in their introduced
ranges, our findings are particularly relevant for our understanding of
the biology of these damaging invaders.
&lt;/p&gt;

Read &lt;a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7007/7/71/abstract"&gt;the article.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=628" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>How effectively do people learn from a variety of different opinions? </title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/11/02/how-effectively-do-people-learn-from-a-variety-of-different-opinions.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/11/02/how-effectively-do-people-learn-from-a-variety-of-different-opinions.aspx</id><published>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Andrew&amp;nbsp;Healy&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="AbstractHeading"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;This paper presents
experimental evidence about how effectively individuals learn from
information coming from heterogeneous sources. In the experiment, Thai
subjects observed information that came from Americans and from other
Thais that they could use to help them answer a series of questions.
Despite listening too little to either group, subjects demonstrated a
significant amount of statistical sophistication in how they weighed
observed American information relative to observed Thai information.
The data indicate that subjects understood that outside information has
extra value because people from the same group tend to make the same
kinds of mistakes. The results illustrate the importance of forming
diverse groups to solve problems. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read&lt;a href="http://www.springerlink.com/content/h321r37q225w5311/?p=be3c3b17da574a739dd750d55167e370&amp;amp;pi=9"&gt; the article. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=629" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>The cognitive neuroscience of deception </title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/11/01/the-cognitive-neuroscience-of-deception.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/11/01/the-cognitive-neuroscience-of-deception.aspx</id><published>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Giorgio Ganis and
Julian Paul Keenan&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;William Hazlitt (1778-1830), a British writer, once asserted that,
“life is the art of being deceived.” Human social relations are so
steeped in deception that it is impossible to imagine life without it.
From great drama sweeping one away momentarily to interleaved complex
romantic relationships, the joining of humans is cemented in place by
deception. The basis of who we are (or aren&amp;#39;t) in relation to others is
often predicated on falsification such that all moral, legal, and
ethical systems must take account of this core feature of human nature.
Some researchers have gone so far as to postulate that human brains are
innately primed to deceive, since deception is recorded in all
societies, extending back to the earliest written record, and it occurs
early in life in a predictable manner. Given the appropriate abstract
reasoning skills, along with basic social abilities, human brains
quickly discover that rewards outweigh the costs associated with
deception. It is therefore an important task of social neuroscience to
reveal the inner workings of deception....&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content%7Edb=all%7Econtent=a915178102"&gt;full article. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=630" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="cognition" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/cognition/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>When Elephants Fly: Differential Sensitivity of Right and Left Inferior Frontal Gyri to Discourse and World Knowledge</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/11/01/when-elephants-fly-differential-sensitivity-of-right-and-left-inferior-frontal-gyri-to-discourse-and-world-knowledge.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/11/01/when-elephants-fly-differential-sensitivity-of-right-and-left-inferior-frontal-gyri-to-discourse-and-world-knowledge.aspx</id><published>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Laura Menenti&lt;span class="NLM_xref-aff"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;, Karl Magnus Petersson, René Scheeringa&lt;span class="NLM_xref-aff"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;, and Peter Hagoort&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Both local discourse and world knowledge are known to influence
sentence processing. We investigated how these two sources of
information conspire in language comprehension. Two types of critical
sentences, correct and world knowledge anomalies, were preceded by
either a neutral or a local context. The latter made the world
knowledge anomalies more acceptable or plausible. We predicted that the
effect of world knowledge anomalies would be weaker for the local
context. World knowledge effects have previously been observed in the
left inferior frontal region (Brodmann&amp;#39;s area 45/47). In the current
study, an effect of world knowledge was present in this region in the
neutral context. We also observed an effect in the right inferior
frontal gyrus, which was more sensitive to the discourse manipulation
than the left inferior frontal gyrus. In addition, the left angular
gyrus reacted strongly to the degree of discourse coherence between the
context and critical sentence. Overall, both world knowledge and the
discourse context affect the process of meaning unification, but do so
by recruiting partly different sets of brain areas.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read &lt;a href="http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1162/jocn.2008.21163"&gt;the article. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=631" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="neuroscience" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/neuroscience/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Toward a Relativity Theory of Rationality</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/11/01/toward-a-relativity-theory-of-rationality.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/11/01/toward-a-relativity-theory-of-rationality.aspx</id><published>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Arie W. Kruglanski and Edward Orehek &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We analyze two conceptions of rationality featured in the social science literature, rationality as a &lt;i&gt;means-ends&lt;/i&gt; relation and rationality as &lt;i&gt;logical consistency&lt;/i&gt;. The former concerns the rationality of &lt;i&gt;actions&lt;/i&gt;; it involves choosing the best means to one&amp;#39;s ends and is naturally akin to conceptions of &lt;i&gt;utility&lt;/i&gt;. The latter concerns the rationality of &lt;i&gt;judgments&lt;/i&gt;, it involves their consistency with other knowledge and is naturally akin to conceptions of &lt;i&gt;truth&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;probability&lt;/i&gt;.
We assume that (1) a uniform process of judgment formation is involved
in both rational and irrational judgments; it follows that the
distinction between more or less rational instances must refer to
judgmental &lt;i&gt;outcomes&lt;/i&gt; rather than &lt;i&gt;processes&lt;/i&gt;; (2) &lt;i&gt;in the moment&lt;/i&gt;
all judgments are consistent with the available evidence hence all are
locally (and trivially!) rational. Accordingly, we present a &lt;i&gt;relativity theory of rationality&lt;/i&gt;
whereby any meaningful conception of rationality needs to transcend the
local context and involve comparisons of local outcomes with detached
(inter or intrapersonal) points of reference.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read &lt;a href="http://www.atypon-link.com/GPI/doi/abs/10.1521/soco.2009.27.5.639"&gt;the article. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Photo from &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tixu/2152498636/"&gt;Flickr Creative Commons. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=632" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>Fast and Frugal Heuristics: Tools of Social Rationality</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/11/01/fast-and-frugal-heuristics-tools-of-social-rationality.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/11/01/fast-and-frugal-heuristics-tools-of-social-rationality.aspx</id><published>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;div class="abstractSection"&gt; &lt;p class="fulltext_style"&gt;Ralph Hertwig and Stefan M. Herzog &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="fulltext_style"&gt;Homo economicus
cannot help but be puzzled by people&amp;#39;s baffling array of social
behaviors that conflict with economic theory. To accommodate these
“deviant” behaviors within the standard view of rationality, defined in
terms of probability theory, logic and rational choice theory,
economists and psychologists tend to inject some psychology into the
rational choice framework. In contrast, we propose to start afresh: We
put forth the thesis that humans&amp;#39; social intelligence is not
qualitatively different from their nonsocial intelligence, and that
important aspects of both kinds of intelligence can be modeled in terms
of boundedly rational fast and frugal heuristics. These heuristics can
be ecologically and socially rational in that they exploit the
structure of physical and social environments as well as evolved
capacities to foster performance both in games against nature and in
social games.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt; Read&lt;a href="http://www.atypon-link.com/GPI/doi/abs/10.1521/soco.2009.27.5.661"&gt; the article.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=633" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>The Cognitive-Ecological Approach to Rationality in Social Psychology</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/11/01/the-cognitive-ecological-approach-to-rationality-in-social-psychology.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/11/01/the-cognitive-ecological-approach-to-rationality-in-social-psychology.aspx</id><published>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="author"&gt;Klaus Fiedler&lt;/span&gt; and  &lt;span class="author"&gt; Michaela Wänke&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The entire discipline of social cognition has been greatly influenced
by the heuristics-and-biases research program, which was traditionally
based on an internal attribution of bounded rationality to the
individual&amp;#39;s motives and resource limitations. The cognitive-ecological
approach challenges this fundamental attribution bias in the
researchers&amp;#39; mind, offering alternative accounts for a long list of
allegedly cognitive biases and shortcomings in terms of external,
environmental sampling biases. In addition to suggesting reattributions
for old findings, the cognitive-ecological approach has inspired the
discovery of novel phenomena, such as interactive sampling schemes,
communication biases, multi-level problems, and ecological properties
that constrain the input to cognitive processes. While this
reattribution offers excuses for the mind&amp;#39;s apparent biases, it also
entails an accusation for the meta-cognitive myopia that prevents the
mind from understanding the pitfalls of the information environment.
Thus, rather than taking either a cynically pessimistic or a naively
optimistic side in the rationality debate, the cognitive-ecological
approach emphasizes the fascinating interactions of cognitive and
ecological constraints of information processing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=634" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Adaptive Rationality: An Evolutionary Perspective on Cognitive Bias</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/11/01/adaptive-rationality-an-evolutionary-perspective-on-cognitive-bias.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/11/01/adaptive-rationality-an-evolutionary-perspective-on-cognitive-bias.aspx</id><published>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="author"&gt;Martie G. Haselton&lt;/span&gt;,  &lt;span class="author"&gt; Gregory A. Bryant&lt;/span&gt;,  &lt;span class="author"&gt; Andreas Wilke&lt;/span&gt;,  &lt;span class="author"&gt; David A. Frederick&lt;/span&gt;,  &lt;span class="author"&gt; Andrew Galperin&lt;/span&gt;,  &lt;span class="author"&gt; Willem E. Frankenhuis&lt;/span&gt;,  &lt;span class="author"&gt; Tyler Moore&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A casual look at the literature in social cognition reveals a vast
collection of biases, errors, violations of rational choice, and
failures to maximize utility. One is tempted to draw the conclusion
that the human mind is woefully muddled. We present a three-category
evolutionary taxonomy of evidence of biases: biases are (a) heuristics,
(b) error management effects, or (c) experimental artifacts. We
conclude that much of the research on cognitive biases can be
profitably reframed and understood in evolutionary terms. An
adaptationist perspective suggests that the mind is remarkably well
designed for important problems of survival and reproduction, and not
fundamentally irrational. Our analysis is not an apologia intended to
place the rational mind on a pedestal for admiration. Rather, it
promises practical outcomes including a clearer view of the
architecture of systems for judgment and decision making, and exposure
of clashes between adaptations designed for the ancestral past and the
demands of the present.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read &lt;a href="http://www.atypon-link.com/GPI/doi/abs/10.1521/soco.2009.27.5.733"&gt;the article. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=635" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Neuroculture</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/11/02/neuroculture.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/11/02/neuroculture.aspx</id><published>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Giovanni Frazzetto &amp;amp;
			Suzanne Anker&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;

Neuroscience addresses questions that, if resolved, will reveal aspects of our individuality. Therefore neuroscientific knowledge is not solely constrained within laboratories, but readily captures the attention of the public at large. Ideas, concepts and images in neuroscience widely circulate in culture and are portrayed in literature, film, works of art, the mass media and commercial products, therefore shaping social values and consumer practices. The interaction between art and science offers an opportunity to make the scientific community and the public aware of the social and ethical implications of the scientific advances in neuroscience.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read &lt;a href="http://www.nature.com/nrn/journal/v10/n11/full/nrn2736.html"&gt;the article. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=640" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="neuroscience" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/neuroscience/default.aspx" /><category term="ethics" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/ethics/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>The motivated use of moral principles</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/11/02/the-motivated-use-of-moral-principles.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/11/02/the-motivated-use-of-moral-principles.aspx</id><published>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Eric Luis Uhlmann, David A. Pizarro, David Tannenbaum and Peter H. Ditto&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Five studies demonstrated that people selectively use general moral
principles to rationalize preferred moral conclusions. In Studies 1a
and 1b, college students and community respondents were presented with
variations on a traditional moral scenario that asked whether it was
permissible to sacrifice one innocent man in order to save a greater
number of people. Political liberals, but not relatively more
conservative participants, were more likely to endorse consequentialism
when the victim had a stereotypically White American name than when the
victim had a stereotypically Black American name. Study 2 found
evidence suggesting participants believe that the moral principles they
are endorsing are general in nature: when presented sequentially with
both versions of the scenario, liberals again showed a bias in
their judgments to the initial scenario, but demonstrated consistency
thereafter. Study 3 found conservatives were more likely to endorse
the unintended killing of innocent civilians when Iraqis civilians were
killed than when Americans civilians were killed, while liberals showed
no significant effect. In Study 4, participants primed with patriotism
were more likely to endorse consequentialism when Iraqi civilians were
killed by American forces than were participants primed with
multiculturalism. However, this was not the case when American
civilians were killed by Iraqi forces. Implications for the role of
reason in moral judgment are discussed.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read &lt;a href="http://journal.sjdm.org/9616/jdm9616.html"&gt;the article. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=641" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Investigating the Role of Two Types of Understanding in Relationship Well-Being: Understanding Is More Important Than Knowledge</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/11/01/investigating-the-role-of-two-types-of-understanding-in-relationship-well-being-understanding-is-more-important-than-knowledge.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/11/01/investigating-the-role-of-two-types-of-understanding-in-relationship-well-being-understanding-is-more-important-than-knowledge.aspx</id><published>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;By: Monique M. H. Pollman and Catrin Finkenauer
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Understanding is at the heart of intimate relationships. It&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;is unclear, however, whether understanding—partners’&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;subjective feeling that they understand each other—or&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;knowledge—partners’ accurate knowledge of each other—is&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;more important for relationship well-being. The present article&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;pits these two types of understanding against each other and&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;investigates their effects on relationship well-being. In a&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;prospective study among 199 newlywed couples, partners’&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;self-reported and perceived understanding and their knowledge&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;in different domains were assessed. Understanding was independent&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;of knowledge. Self-reported and perceived understanding predicted&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;relationship well-being but neither type of knowledge did. Thus,&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;subjectively feeling that one understands and is understood&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;by one’s partner appears to be more important to relationship&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;well-being than actually knowing and being known by one’s&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;partner.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://psp.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/11/1512"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Photo from &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/timove/3437491353/"&gt;Flickr Creative Commons. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=642" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>ajstasic</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/ajstasic.aspx</uri></author><category term="Wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/Wisdom/default.aspx" /><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /><category term="cognition" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/cognition/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Emotions as Within or Between People? Cultural Variation in Lay Theories of Emotion Expression and Inference</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/11/01/emotions-as-within-or-between-people-cultural-variation-in-lay-theories-of-emotion-expression-and-inference.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/11/01/emotions-as-within-or-between-people-cultural-variation-in-lay-theories-of-emotion-expression-and-inference.aspx</id><published>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">By Yukiko Uchida, Sarah S. M. Townsend, Hazel Rose Markus, and Hilary B. Bergsieker
&lt;p&gt;Four studies using open-ended and experimental methods test&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;the hypothesis that in Japanese contexts, emotions are understood&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;as between people, whereas in American contexts, emotions are&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;understood as primarily within people. Study 1 analyzed television&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;interviews of Olympic athletes. When asked about their relationships,&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;Japanese athletes used significantly more emotion words than&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;American athletes. This difference was not significant when&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;questions asked directly about athletes&amp;#39; feelings. In Study&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;2, when describing an athlete&amp;#39;s emotional reaction to winning,&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;Japanese participants implicated others more often than American&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;participants. After reading an athlete&amp;#39;s self-description, Japanese&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;participants inferred more emotions when the athlete mentioned&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;relationships, whereas American participants inferred more emotions&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;when the athlete focused only on herself (Study 3). Finally,&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;when viewing images of athletes, Japanese participants inferred&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;more emotions for athletes pictured with teammates, whereas&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;American participants inferred more emotions for athletes pictured&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;alone (Studies 4a and 4b).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read &lt;a href="http://psp.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/11/1427"&gt;the article. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=643" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>ajstasic</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/ajstasic.aspx</uri></author><category term="evolution" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/evolution/default.aspx" /><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /><category term="intelligence" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/intelligence/default.aspx" /><category term="cognition" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/cognition/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Individuals, groups, fitness and utility: multi-level selection meets social choice theory </title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/11/01/individuals-groups-fitness-and-utility-multi-level-selection-meets-social-choice-theory.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/11/01/individuals-groups-fitness-and-utility-multi-level-selection-meets-social-choice-theory.aspx</id><published>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;By Samir&amp;nbsp;Okasha&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In models of multi-level selection, the property of Darwinian fitness
is attributed to entities at more than one level of the biological
hierarchy, e.g. individuals and groups. However, the relation between
individual and group fitness is a controversial matter. Theorists
disagree about whether group fitness should always, or ever, be defined
as total (or average) individual fitness. This paper tries to shed
light on the issue by drawing on work in social choice theory, and
pursuing an analogy between fitness and utility. Social choice
theorists have long been interested in the relation between individual
and social utility, and have identified conditions under which social
utility equals total (or average) individual utility. These ideas are
used to shed light on the biological problem.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www.springerlink.com/content/mw515528u3427812/?p=da7526b5f17f426eb1cbc95b3ec99f33&amp;amp;pi=0"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=644" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>ajstasic</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/ajstasic.aspx</uri></author><category term="culture" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/culture/default.aspx" /><category term="social psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/social+psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="knowledge" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/knowledge/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>The long reach of philosophy of biology </title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/11/01/the-long-reach-of-philosophy-of-biology.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/11/01/the-long-reach-of-philosophy-of-biology.aspx</id><published>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-11-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;A review of Michael Ruse&amp;#39;s book by Matt&amp;nbsp;Gers. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Biology&lt;/i&gt; covers a broad
range of topics in this field. It is not just a textbook focusing on
evolutionary theory but encompasses ethics, social science and
behaviour too. This essay outlines the scope of the work, discusses
some points on methodology in the philosophy of biology, and then moves
on to a more detailed analysis of cultural evolution and the
applicability of a philosophy of biology toolkit to the social
sciences. It is noted that concepts like the species concept may
generalise to other domains whilst failing to account for the nature of
all species. Finally, the author notes the omission of any discussion
of information in biology.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www.springerlink.com/content/30u5886l21246202/?p=eeddd360985946a39db9144caf83cea0&amp;amp;pi=0"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=645" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>ajstasic</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/ajstasic.aspx</uri></author><category term="PHILOSOPHY" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/PHILOSOPHY/default.aspx" /><category term="biology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/biology/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>You are who remembers you. Detecting leadership through accuracy of recall</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/11/you-are-who-remembers-you-detecting-leadership-through-accuracy-of-recall.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/11/you-are-who-remembers-you-detecting-leadership-through-accuracy-of-recall.aspx</id><published>2009-10-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-10-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Francesca Grippa and Peter A. Gloor&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We measured interpersonal perception accuracy by focusing on the
relationship between actors’ centrality and their ability to accurately
report their social interactions. We used the network measures of
actors’ betweenness centrality and degree centrality to identify the
most prominent members by correlating ego-perception and
alter-perception in a “non-reciprocity” type of misalignment. We found
a positive correlation between actors’ centrality and their centrality
as assessed by senior management, and a negative correlation between
actors’ centrality and their accuracy in recalling interactions.
Underreporting social interactions may represent a third way of
measuring the importance of members and finding the most influential
actors.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&amp;amp;_udi=B6VD1-4X00P7G-1&amp;amp;_user=5745&amp;amp;_coverDate=10%2F31%2F2009&amp;amp;_rdoc=5&amp;amp;_fmt=high&amp;amp;_orig=browse&amp;amp;_srch=doc-info%28%23toc%235969%232009%23999689995%231477073%23FLA%23display%23Volume%29&amp;amp;_cdi=5969&amp;amp;_sort=d&amp;amp;_docanchor=&amp;amp;_ct=7&amp;amp;_acct=C000001358&amp;amp;_version=1&amp;amp;_urlVersion=0&amp;amp;_userid=5745&amp;amp;md5=450c437839bccc90eff44034a0ce19c3"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=722" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="Wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/Wisdom/default.aspx" /><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /><category term="leadership" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/leadership/default.aspx" /><category term="organizational behavior" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/organizational+behavior/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Opening the black box of link formation: Social factors underlying the structure of the web</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/11/opening-the-black-box-of-link-formation-social-factors-underlying-the-structure-of-the-web.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/11/opening-the-black-box-of-link-formation-social-factors-underlying-the-structure-of-the-web.aspx</id><published>2009-10-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-10-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Sondra Gonzalez-Bailon &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Links play a twofold role on the web: they open the channels through
which users access information, and they determine the centrality of
sites and their visibility. This paper adds two factors to the analysis
of links that aim to draw a parallel between the web and other offline
interorganisational networks: the resources that the organisations
publishing online are able to mobilise, and the status or public
recognition of those organisations. Exponential random graph models
(ERGMs) are used to analyse a sample of the web of about one thousand
sites, showing that both the economic resources of the producers of the
sites (a proxy to their wider pool of resources) and their presence in
traditional news media (a proxy to their status) significantly increase
their probability of receiving more links, and therefore, their
centrality. This adds a sociologically relevant dimension to the
analysis of the web that has been disregarded so far but that is
crucial to understand the way it distributes visibility. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&amp;amp;_udi=B6VD1-4X076XD-2&amp;amp;_user=5745&amp;amp;_coverDate=10%2F31%2F2009&amp;amp;_rdoc=7&amp;amp;_fmt=high&amp;amp;_orig=browse&amp;amp;_srch=doc-info%28%23toc%235969%232009%23999689995%231477073%23FLA%23display%23Volume%29&amp;amp;_cdi=5969&amp;amp;_sort=d&amp;amp;_docanchor=&amp;amp;_ct=7&amp;amp;_acct=C000001358&amp;amp;_version=1&amp;amp;_urlVersion=0&amp;amp;_userid=5745&amp;amp;md5=b3822af6c5c6e74b0566efb985d27d22"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=723" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="culture" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/culture/default.aspx" /><category term="social psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/social+psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="practical wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/practical+wisdom/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Christian Women in IPV Relationships: An Exploratory Study of Religious Factors.</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/14/christian-women-in-ipv-relationships-an-exploratory-study-of-religious-factors.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/14/christian-women-in-ipv-relationships-an-exploratory-study-of-religious-factors.aspx</id><published>2009-10-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-10-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mei-Chuan Wang, Sharon G. Horne, Heidi M. Levitt, Lisa M. Klesges&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The study examined Christian women&amp;#39;s religious beliefs and practices in
relationship to their intimate partner violence (IPV) relationships.
The religious variables included religious affiliation status,
religious attendance, religious teachings about gender roles in
marriage, and religious problem-solving approaches. Of 1,476 religious
Christian women in a southwest metropolitan region, 50.7% (n = 749)
reported that they had experienced at least one or more types of abuse
(physical violence, emotional abuse, sexual assault, stalking, or
threats) by current or previous intimate partners. Women and their
intimate partners who attended more regularly in church services were
less likely to be involved in IPV relationships. There were no
significant differences in rates of domestic violence reported between
women from conservative affiliations and liberal/moderate affiliations,
although women in congregations that did not support divorce in cases
of IPV appeared to be more likely to be victims of abuse. In addition,
more than 70% of Christian women who left an IPV relationship reported
their faith provided them the strength to leave.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://web.ebscohost.com.proxy.uchicago.edu/ehost/detail?vid=1&amp;amp;hid=6&amp;amp;sid=e397d0f7-3860-4fd9-97ae-e3b00a7f1b44%40sessionmgr11&amp;amp;bdata=JmxvZ2lucGFnZT1Mb2dpbi5hc3Amc2l0ZT1laG9zdC1saXZlJnNjb3BlPXNpdGU%3d#db=aph&amp;amp;AN=45150007"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=745" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /><category term="religion" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/religion/default.aspx" /><category term="practical wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/practical+wisdom/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Wisdom and Positive Psychosocial Values in Young Adulthood</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/10/01/wisdom-and-positive-psychosocial-values-in-young-adulthood.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/10/01/wisdom-and-positive-psychosocial-values-in-young-adulthood.aspx</id><published>2009-10-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-10-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Jeffrey&amp;nbsp;Dean&amp;nbsp;Webster &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="AbstractHeading"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract&lt;/b&gt;: &lt;/span&gt;The current project
investigates wisdom and positive psychosocial characteristics in young
adults in a series of three overlapping studies. Study 1 (&lt;i&gt;N&lt;/i&gt;&amp;nbsp;=&amp;nbsp;61) investigated wisdom and
ego-integrity, values, and life attitudes. Results indicated that
wisdom was positively correlated with ego-integrity and
self/other-enhancing values, as well as a sense of personal coherence;
wisdom was negatively correlated with hedonistic values. Study 2 (&lt;i&gt;N&lt;/i&gt;&amp;nbsp;=&amp;nbsp;62) investigated
wisdom and attachment anxiety/avoidance and life attitudes. Results
replicated the findings for the life attitudes of Coherence and
Existential Vacuum demonstrated in study 1 and extended these findings
by showing predicted correlations among wisdom and four other life
attitudes, as well as demonstrated negative correlations among wisdom
and attachment avoidance and attachment anxiety. Study 3 (&lt;i&gt;N&lt;/i&gt;&amp;nbsp;=&amp;nbsp;62) showed that wisdom positively predicted attributional complexity, a variable found to reduce social judgement biases.
         Implications and future directions are discussed.
      &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read &lt;a href="http://www.springerlink.com.proxy.uchicago.edu/content/q1j195k452561j18/?p=9af3ac7b5c2e44d798c819da751493ee&amp;amp;pi=2"&gt;the article. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Photo from &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/herbarium_gnome/2054571444/"&gt;Flickr Creative Commons. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=616" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Perceptual Decisions: From Sensory Signals to Behavior</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/10/01/perceptual-decisions-from-sensory-signals-to-behavior.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/10/01/perceptual-decisions-from-sensory-signals-to-behavior.aspx</id><published>2009-10-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-10-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Joachim Gross and Markus Ploner&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="display:inline;" class="articleText"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Recent non-invasive studies in humans
provide new insights into the timing of&amp;nbsp;perceptual decision making and
show that integrated sensory evidence is&amp;nbsp;represented in motor areas
well before a behavioral response.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read &lt;a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com.proxy.uchicago.edu/science?_ob=ArticleURL&amp;amp;_udi=B6VRT-4XB8C85-C&amp;amp;_user=5745&amp;amp;_coverDate=09%2F29%2F2009&amp;amp;_rdoc=11&amp;amp;_fmt=high&amp;amp;_orig=browse&amp;amp;_srch=doc-info%28%23toc%236243%232009%23999809981%231521135%23FLA%23display%23Volume%29&amp;amp;_cdi=6243&amp;amp;_sort=d&amp;amp;_docanchor=&amp;amp;_ct=32&amp;amp;_acct=C000001358&amp;amp;_version=1&amp;amp;_urlVersion=0&amp;amp;_userid=5745&amp;amp;md5=0dbcc911e58dec46dc642e8dca6b05b8"&gt;the article. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=617" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Animal Cognition: Aesop's Fable Flies from Fiction to Fact</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/10/01/animal-cognition-aesop-s-fable-flies-from-fiction-to-fact.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/10/01/animal-cognition-aesop-s-fable-flies-from-fiction-to-fact.aspx</id><published>2009-10-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-10-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Alex H. Taylor and Russell D. Gray&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A new study shows that rooks are able to spontaneously drop stones into
a tube of water to obtain a floating worm. This sophisticated problem
solving raises intriguing questions about the use of imagination in
animals.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read &lt;a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com.proxy.uchicago.edu/science?_ob=ArticleURL&amp;amp;_udi=B6VRT-4X0FH3F-1&amp;amp;_user=5745&amp;amp;_coverDate=09%2F15%2F2009&amp;amp;_rdoc=13&amp;amp;_fmt=high&amp;amp;_orig=browse&amp;amp;_srch=doc-info%28%23toc%236243%232009%23999809982%231493170%23FLA%23display%23Volume%29&amp;amp;_cdi=6243&amp;amp;_sort=d&amp;amp;_docanchor=&amp;amp;_ct=42&amp;amp;_acct=C000001358&amp;amp;_version=1&amp;amp;_urlVersion=0&amp;amp;_userid=5745&amp;amp;md5=6050af5890c3a92161f4e792bdd9248c"&gt;the article. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=618" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="cognition" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/cognition/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>The Wayfinders: Why Ancient Wisdom Matters in the Modern World</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/10/01/the-wayfinders-why-ancient-wisdom-matters-in-the-modern-world.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/10/01/the-wayfinders-why-ancient-wisdom-matters-in-the-modern-world.aspx</id><published>2009-10-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-10-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Wade Davis&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Over the past decade, many of us have been alarmed to learn of the
rapidly accelerating extinction of our planet&amp;#39;s diverse flora and
fauna. But how many of us know that our human cultural diversity is
also going extinct at a shocking rate? Biologists estimate that 18% of
mammals and 11% of birds are threatened, while botanists anticipate the
loss of 8% of flora. Meanwhile, of the 7,000 languages in the world
today, 50% will disappear in our lifetime. Languages are merely the
canaries in the coalmine: what of the poetry, songs, knowledge, and
ways of seeing encoded in these disappearing voices? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;In &lt;i&gt;The Wayfinders&lt;/i&gt;, acclaimed anthropologist Wade Davis
offers a gripping account of this urgent crisis. He leads us on a
fascinating tour through a handful of indigenous cultures and
worldviews while reminding us of the encroaching dangers posed by
unchecked globalization. An enlightening, awe-inspiring, and cautionary
look at vanishing cultures and languages from one of the world&amp;#39;s most
celebrated and distinguished anthropologists.&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Link to &lt;a href="http://www.anansi.ca/titles.cfm?pub_id=1359"&gt;the publisher. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Photo from &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/dotdoubledot/395003556/"&gt;Flickr Creative Commons. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=620" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="Wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/Wisdom/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Streetlights and Shadows: Searching for the Keys to Adaptive Decision Making</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/10/09/streetlights-and-shadows-searching-for-the-keys-to-adaptive-decision-making.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/10/09/streetlights-and-shadows-searching-for-the-keys-to-adaptive-decision-making.aspx</id><published>2009-10-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-10-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;quot;In making decisions, when should we go with our gut and when should we
try to analyze every option? When should we use our intuition and when
should we rely on logic and statistics? Most of us would probably agree
that for important decisions, we should follow certain
guidelines—gather as much information as possible, compare the options,
pin down the goals before getting started. But in practice we make some
of our best decisions by adapting to circumstances rather than blindly
following procedures. In Streetlights and Shadows, Gary Klein debunks
the conventional wisdom about how to make decisions. He takes ten
commonly accepted claims about decision making and shows that they are
better suited for the laboratory than for life. The standard advice
works well when everything is clear, but the tough decisions involve
shadowy conditions of complexity and ambiguity. Gathering masses of
information, for example, works if the information is accurate and
complete—but that doesn&amp;#39;t often happen in the real world. (Think about
the careful risk calculations that led to the downfall of the Wall
Street investment houses.)&lt;br /&gt;  &lt;br /&gt; &amp;quot;Klein offers more realistic ideas
about how to make decisions in real-life settings. He provides many
examples—ranging from airline pilots and weather forecasters to sports
announcers and Captain Jack Aubrey in Patrick O&amp;#39;Brian&amp;#39;s &lt;i&gt;Master and Commander&lt;/i&gt;
novels—to make his point. All these decision makers saw things that
others didn&amp;#39;t. They used their expertise to pick up cues and to discern
patterns and trends. We can make better decisions, Klein tells us, if
we are prepared for complexity and ambiguity and if we will stop
expecting the data to tell us everything.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Source: &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0262013398?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;tag=mymindonbooks-20&amp;amp;linkCode=as2&amp;amp;camp=1789&amp;amp;creative=390957&amp;amp;creativeASIN=0262013398" target="_blank"&gt;Amazon.com&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=626" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /><category term="cognition" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/cognition/default.aspx" /><category term="knowledge" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/knowledge/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Social and semantic coevolution in knowledge networks</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/10/01/social-and-semantic-coevolution-in-knowledge-networks.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/10/01/social-and-semantic-coevolution-in-knowledge-networks.aspx</id><published>2009-10-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-10-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Camille Roth, Jean-Philippe Cointet&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Socio-semantic networks involve agents creating and processing
information: communities of scientists, software developers, wiki
contributors and webloggers are, among others, examples of such
knowledge networks. We aim at demonstrating that the dynamics of these
communities can be adequately described as the coevolution of a social
and a socio-semantic network. More precisely, we will first introduce a
theoretical framework based on a social network and a socio-semantic
network, i.e. an epistemic network featuring agents, concepts and links
between agents and between agents and concepts. Adopting a relevant
empirical protocol, we will then describe the joint dynamics of social
and socio-semantic structures, at both macroscopic and microscopic
scales, emphasizing the remarkable stability of these macroscopic
properties in spite of a vivid local, agent-based network dynamics.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read &lt;a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&amp;amp;_udi=B6VD1-4XC3X6K-1&amp;amp;_user=5745&amp;amp;_rdoc=1&amp;amp;_fmt=&amp;amp;_orig=search&amp;amp;_sort=d&amp;amp;_docanchor=&amp;amp;view=c&amp;amp;_acct=C000001358&amp;amp;_version=1&amp;amp;_urlVersion=0&amp;amp;_userid=5745&amp;amp;md5=64e0a860b4afb1d5cde27b092978baaf"&gt;the article&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Photo from &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/shadowfall/3044612972/"&gt;Flickr Creative Commons. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=668" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /><category term="social psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/social+psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="knowledge" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/knowledge/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Are complex decisions better left to the unconscious? Further failed replications of the deliberation-without-attention effect </title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/10/01/are-complex-decisions-better-left-to-the-unconscious-further-failed-replications-of-the-deliberation-without-attention-effect-2009.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/10/01/are-complex-decisions-better-left-to-the-unconscious-further-failed-replications-of-the-deliberation-without-attention-effect-2009.aspx</id><published>2009-10-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-10-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Dustin P. Calvillo and Alan Penaloza&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The deliberation-without-attention effect occurs when better decisions are made when people experience a period of distraction before a decision than when they make&amp;nbsp; decisions immediately or when they spend time reflecting on the alternatives. This effect has been explained (e.g., Dijksterhuis, 2004) by the claim that people engage in unconscious deliberation when distracted and that unconscious thought is better suited for complex decisions than conscious thought. Experiments 1, 2A, and 2B in this study included a dominant alternative and failed to find evidence for this effect. Experiment &amp;nbsp; removed the dominant alternative and manipulated mode of thought within-subjects to&amp;nbsp; eliminate alternative explanations for the failed replication. In all experiments participants did not make better decisions after unconscious thought; decisions were consistently better than chance when made immediately after the encoding of information. Encouraging people not to think about complex decisions appears to be unwarranted.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read &lt;a href="http://journal.sjdm.org/9711/jdm9711.pdf"&gt;the article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=662" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Predicting Soccer Matches After Unconscious and Conscious Thought as a Function of Expertise</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/10/01/predicting-soccer-matches-after-unconscious-and-conscious-thought-as-a-function-of-expertise-2009.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/10/01/predicting-soccer-matches-after-unconscious-and-conscious-thought-as-a-function-of-expertise-2009.aspx</id><published>2009-10-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-10-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="name"&gt;&lt;span class="forenames"&gt;Ap&lt;/span&gt;
					&lt;span class="surname"&gt;Dijksterhuis&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span class="name"&gt;&lt;span class="forenames"&gt;Maarten W.&lt;/span&gt;
					&lt;span class="surname"&gt;Bos&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span class="name"&gt;&lt;span class="forenames"&gt;Andries&lt;/span&gt;
					&lt;span class="surname"&gt;van der Leij&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt;, and &lt;span class="name"&gt;&lt;span class="forenames"&gt;Rick B.&lt;/span&gt;
					&lt;span class="surname"&gt;van Baaren&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="h5-inline"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;In two experiments, we investigated the
effects of expertise and mode of thought on the accuracy of people&amp;#39;s
predictions. Both experts and nonexperts predicted the results of
soccer matches after conscious thought, after unconscious thought, or
immediately. In Experiment 1, experts who thought unconsciously
outperformed participants in all other conditions. Whereas unconscious
thinkers showed a correlation between expertise and accuracy of
prediction, no such relation was observed for conscious thinkers or for
immediate decision makers. In Experiment 2, this general pattern was
replicated. In addition, experts who thought unconsciously were better
at applying diagnostic information than experts who thought consciously
or who decided immediately. The results are consistent with
unconscious-thought theory.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Read &lt;a href="http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/122632059/abstract"&gt;the article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=663" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>Decisions Under Distress: Stress Profiles Influence Anchoring and Adjustment</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/10/01/decisions-under-distress-stress-profiles-influence-anchoring-and-adjustment.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/10/01/decisions-under-distress-stress-profiles-influence-anchoring-and-adjustment.aspx</id><published>2009-10-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-10-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="name"&gt;&lt;span class="forenames"&gt;Karim S.&lt;/span&gt;
					&lt;span class="surname"&gt;Kassam&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span class="name"&gt;&lt;span class="forenames"&gt;Katrina&lt;/span&gt;
					&lt;span class="surname"&gt;Koslov&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span class="name"&gt;&lt;span class="forenames"&gt;Wendy Berry&lt;/span&gt;
					&lt;span class="surname"&gt;Mendes&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;People frequently make decisions under stress. Understanding how stress
affects decision making is complicated by the fact that not all stress
responses are created equal. Challenge states, for example, occur when
individuals appraise a stressful situation as demanding, but believe
they have the personal resources to cope, and are characterized by
efficient cardiovascular reactivity and approach motivation. Threat
states, in contrast, occur when situational demands are perceived to
outweigh resources and are characterized by less efficient
cardiovascular reactivity and withdrawal motivation. We randomly
assigned participants to social-feedback conditions (i.e., positive or
negative feedback) designed to engender challenge or threat, or a
no-stress condition. Participants then completed an
anchoring-and-adjustment questionnaire. Those assigned to the challenge
condition adjusted more from self-generated anchors than those assigned
to the threat condition. Cardiovascular responses mediated the
relationship between condition and adjustment. This study demonstrates
the importance of considering profiles of cardiovascular reactivity
when examining the influence of stress on decision making.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read &lt;a href="http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/122651083/HTMLSTART"&gt;the article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=664" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Saving the world one patient at a time: Psychoanalysis and social critique</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/15/saving-the-world-one-patient-at-a-time-psychoanalysis-and-social-critique.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/15/saving-the-world-one-patient-at-a-time-psychoanalysis-and-social-critique.aspx</id><published>2009-10-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-10-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Jennifer Tolleson&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In contrast to its revolutionary beginnings, the psychoanalytic
discourse has abandoned its potential as a critical, dissident force in
contemporary life. It is imperative, in our efforts to engage in
socially responsible clinical practice, that we restore the
sociocritical function to our professional mandate, and that we apply
such critique to our symbiosis with the dominant organizing social and
economic order. In our close encounter with the tragedies and
profundities of the human subject, we are uniquely poised to inhabit a
critical, dissident and ardent sensibility in relation to the larger
political world. Our immersion in human subjectivity makes possible a
vivid and poignant perspective on human experience in contemporary
life, and yet our valorization of the subjective and the individual,
and our difficulty looking beyond the dyad as the site of human
suffering and human transformation occludes a broader social and
historical inquiry. So, too, does our preoccupation with holding onto
our professional legitimacy, staying viable in the marketplace, which
tempts us in morally dubious directions and dampens our freedom to
elaborate a more oppositional, or dissident, sensibility. Arguably the
profession has a responsibility to make a contribution, practical and
discursive, clinical and theoretical, to human rights and social
justice. A contribution along these lines requires tremendous courage
as we push back against the gains afforded by our conformity to the
status quo.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www3.interscience.wiley.com.proxy.uchicago.edu/journal/122605199/abstract"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=761" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="culture" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/culture/default.aspx" /><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /><category term="social psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/social+psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="wisdom-related knowledge" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/wisdom-related+knowledge/default.aspx" /><category term="practical wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/practical+wisdom/default.aspx" /><category term="ethics" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/ethics/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>The Berlin Wisdom Paradigm: A Conceptual Analysis of a Psychological Approach to Wisdom</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/11/01/the-berlin-wisdom-paradigm-a-conceptual-analysis-of-a-psychological-approach-to-wisdom.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/11/01/the-berlin-wisdom-paradigm-a-conceptual-analysis-of-a-psychological-approach-to-wisdom.aspx</id><published>2009-09-30T22:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-09-30T22:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p class="document-abstract"&gt;By Konrad Banicki. The
main purpose of this article is to undertake a conceptual investigation
of the Berlin Wisdom Paradigm: a psychological project initiated by
Paul Baltes and intended to study the complex phenomenon of wisdom.
Firstly, in order to provide a wider perspective for the subsequent
analyses, a short historical sketch is given. Secondly, a
meta-theoretical issue of the degree to which the subject matter of the
Baltesian study can be identified with the traditional philosophical
wisdom is addressed. The main result yielded by a careful conceptual
analysis is that the philosophical and psychological concepts of
wisdom, though not entirely the same, are at least parallel. Finally,
one of the revealed aspects of the Berlin Wisdom Paradigm, i.e. its
relative neglect of the non-cognitive and personal aspects of wisdom is
brought to the fore. This deficiency, it is suggested, can be remedied
by the application of the virtue ethics&amp;#39; conceptual framework.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="document-toolbar"&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
      &lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=651" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>konradbanicki</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/konradbanicki.aspx</uri></author><category term="Wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/Wisdom/default.aspx" /><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="baltes" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/baltes/default.aspx" /><category term="wisdom-related knowledge" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/wisdom-related+knowledge/default.aspx" /><category term="practical wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/practical+wisdom/default.aspx" /><category term="virtue" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/virtue/default.aspx" /><category term="PHILOSOPHY" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/PHILOSOPHY/default.aspx" /><category term="ethics" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/ethics/default.aspx" /><category term="knowledge" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/knowledge/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Fitness “kinematics”: biological function, altruism, and organism–environment development</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/09/29/fitness-kinematics-biological-function-altruism-and-organism-environment-development.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/09/29/fitness-kinematics-biological-function-altruism-and-organism-environment-development.aspx</id><published>2009-09-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-09-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Marshall Abrams &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; It’s recently been argued that biological fitness can’t change over the
course of an organism’s life as a result of organisms’ behaviors.
However, some characterizations of biological function and biological
altruism tacitly or explicitly assume that an effect of a trait can
change an organism’s fitness. In the first part of the paper, I explain
that the core idea of changing fitness can be understood in terms of
conditional probabilities defined over sequences of events in an
organism’s life. The result is a notion of “conditional fitness” which
is static but which captures intuitions about apparent behavioral
effects on fitness. The second part of the paper investigates the
possibility of providing a systematic foundation for conditional
fitness in terms of spaces of sequences of states of an organism and
its environment. I argue that the resulting “organism–environment
history conception” helps unify diverse biological perspectives, and
may provide part of a metaphysics of natural selection.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read &lt;a href="http://www.springerlink.com.proxy.uchicago.edu/content/q6768755qt4381m2/?p=165ec3960a334808b9a6b5b8320d65dd&amp;amp;pi=4"&gt;the article. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=615" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="evolution" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/evolution/default.aspx" /><category term="PHILOSOPHY" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/PHILOSOPHY/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Varieties of (Scientific) Creativity: A Hierarchical Model of Domain-Specific Disposition, Development, and Achievement</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/09/01/varieties-of-scientific-creativity-a-hierarchical-model-of-domain-specific-disposition-development-and-achievement.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/09/01/varieties-of-scientific-creativity-a-hierarchical-model-of-domain-specific-disposition-development-and-achievement.aspx</id><published>2009-09-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-09-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="name"&gt;&lt;span class="forenames"&gt;Dean Keith&lt;/span&gt;
					&lt;span class="surname"&gt;Simonton&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Prior research supports the inference that scientific disciplines can
be ordered into a hierarchy ranging from the &amp;quot;hard&amp;quot; natural sciences to
the &amp;quot;soft&amp;quot; social sciences. This ordering corresponds with such
objective criteria as disciplinary consensus, knowledge obsolescence
rate, anticipation frequency, theories-to-laws ratio, lecture
disfluency, and age at recognition. It is then argued that this
hierarchy can be extrapolated to encompass the humanities and arts and
interpolated within specific domains to accommodate contrasts in
subdomains (e.g., revolutionary versus normal science). This expanded
and more finely differentiated hierarchy is then shown to have a
partial psychological basis in terms of dispositional traits (e.g.,
psychopathology) and developmental experiences (e.g., family
background). This demonstration then leads to three hypotheses about
how a creator&amp;#39;s domain-specific impact depends on his or her
disposition and development: the domain-progressive, domain-typical,
and domain-regressive creator hypotheses. Studies published thus far
lend the most support to the domain-regressive creator hypothesis. In
particular, major contributors to a domain are more likely to have
dispositional traits and developmental experiences most similar to
those that prevail in a domain lower in the disciplinary hierarchy.
However, some complications to this generalization suggest the need for
more research on the proposed hierarchical model. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read &lt;a href="http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/122591892/abstract"&gt;the article&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Link to &lt;a href="http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/122591891/abstract"&gt;reply. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=665" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>What Do ‘We’ Know That ‘They’ Don’t? Sociologists’ versus Non-Sociologists’ Knowledge</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/11/24/what-do-we-know-that-they-don-t-sociologists-versus-non-sociologists-knowledge.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/11/24/what-do-we-know-that-they-don-t-sociologists-versus-non-sociologists-knowledge.aspx</id><published>2009-09-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-09-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Anne Mesny&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This paper attempts to clarify or to reposition some of the
controversies generated by Burawoy’s defense of public sociology and by
his vision of the mutually stimulating relationship between the
different forms of sociology. Before arguing if, why, and how,
sociology should or could be more ‘public’, it might be useful to
reflect upon what it is we think we, as sociologists, know that ‘lay
people’ do not. This paper thus explores the public sociology debate’s
epistemological core, namely the issue of the relationship between
sociologists’ and non-sociologists’ knowledge of the social world. Four
positions regarding the status of sociologists’ knowledge versus lay
people’s knowledge are explored: superiority (sociologists’ knowledge
of the social world is more accurate, objective and reflexive than lay
people’s knowledge, thanks to science’s methods and norms), homology
(when they are made explicit, lay theories about the social world often
parallel social scientists’ theories), complementarity (lay people’s
and social scientists’ knowledge complement one another. The former’s
local, embedded knowledge is essential to the latter’s general,
disembedded knowledge), and circularity (sociologists’ knowledge
continuously infuses commonsensical knowledge, and scientific knowledge
about the social world is itself rooted in common sense knowledge. Each
form of knowledge feeds the other). For each of these positions,
implications are drawn regarding the terms, possibilities and
conditions of a dialogue between sociologists and their publics,
especially if we are to take the circularity thesis seriously.
Conclusions point to the accountability we face towards the people we
study, and to the idea that sociology is always performative, a point
that has, to some extent, been obscured by Burawoy’s distinctions
between professional, critical, policy and public sociologies.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;See &lt;a href="http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/CJS/article/view/6313"&gt;the article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=669" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="social psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/social+psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="knowledge" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/knowledge/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>The Unconscious Eye Opener: Pupil Dilation Reveals Strategic Recruitment of Resources Upon Presentation of Subliminal Reward Cues</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/09/01/the-unconscious-eye-opener-pupil-dilation-reveals-strategic-recruitment-of-resources-upon-presentation-of-subliminal-reward-cues.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/09/01/the-unconscious-eye-opener-pupil-dilation-reveals-strategic-recruitment-of-resources-upon-presentation-of-subliminal-reward-cues.aspx</id><published>2009-09-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-09-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Erik Bijleveld, Ruud Custers, and Henk Aarts&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;No abstract available.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/122608385/abstract"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=673" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="neuroscience" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/neuroscience/default.aspx" /><category term="knowledge" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/knowledge/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>The desirability bias in predictions: Going optimistic without leaving realism</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/09/01/the-desirability-bias-in-predictions-going-optimistic-without-leaving-realism.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/09/01/the-desirability-bias-in-predictions-going-optimistic-without-leaving-realism.aspx</id><published>2009-09-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-09-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Paul D. Windschitl, Andrew R. Smith, Jason P. Rose and Zlatan Krizan&lt;b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Does desire for an outcome inflate optimism? Previous experiments have produced mixed results regarding the &lt;i&gt;desirability bias&lt;/i&gt;, with the bulk of supportive findings coming from one paradigm—the classic &lt;i&gt;marked-card paradigm&lt;/i&gt;
in which people make discrete predictions about desirable or
undesirable cards being drawn from decks. We introduce a
biased-guessing account for the effects from this paradigm, which
posits that people are often realistic in their likelihood assessments,
but when making a subjectively arbitrary prediction (a guess), they
will tend to guess in a desired direction. In order to establish the
validity of the biased-guessing account and to distinguish it from
other accounts, we conducted five experiments that tested the
desirability bias within the paradigm and novel extensions of it. In
addition to supporting the biased-guessing account, the findings
illustrate the critical role of moderators (e.g., type of outcome, type
of forecast) for fully understanding and predicting desirability biases.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Read &lt;a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&amp;amp;_udi=B6WP2-4X6V9X9-1&amp;amp;_user=5745&amp;amp;_rdoc=1&amp;amp;_fmt=&amp;amp;_orig=search&amp;amp;_sort=d&amp;amp;_docanchor=&amp;amp;view=c&amp;amp;_acct=C000001358&amp;amp;_version=1&amp;amp;_urlVersion=0&amp;amp;_userid=5745&amp;amp;md5=6dc299c89d0e394b4313a4aafbf438a6"&gt;the article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=661" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>The effects of insula damage on decision-making for risky gains and losses</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/09/01/the-effects-of-insula-damage-on-decision-making-for-risky-gains-and-losses.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/09/01/the-effects-of-insula-damage-on-decision-making-for-risky-gains-and-losses.aspx</id><published>2009-09-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-09-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;By Joshua A. Weller;&amp;nbsp; Irwin P. Levin;&amp;nbsp; Baba Shiv; Antoine Bechara&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Several lines of functional neuroimaging studies have attributed a role for the insula, a critical component of the brain&amp;#39;s emotional circuitry, in risky decision-making. However, very little evidence yet exists as to whether the insula is necessary for advantageous decision-making under risk, specifically decisions involving uncertain gains and losses. The present study uses a risky decision-making task with lesion patients and healthy controls to investigate the effects of focal insula damage on risk-taking to achieve gains and to avoid losses. Compared to healthy controls, insula lesion patients showed an altered decision-making pattern in domains involving both risky gains and risky losses. Specifically, insula damage was associated with insensitivity to differences in expected value between choice options. Additionally, patients made significantly fewer risky choices than healthy adults in the gain domain. In conjunction with earlier findings, these results suggest that risky decision-making is dependent on the integrity of a neural circuitry that includes several brain regions known to be critical for the experience and expression of emotions, namely the insula, amygdala, and ventromedial prefrontal cortex. However, each neural region seems to provide a distinct contribution to the overall process of decision-making. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www.informaworld.com.proxy.uchicago.edu/smpp/content%7Edb=all%7Econtent=a911656351"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=586" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>ajstasic</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/ajstasic.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /><category term="social psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/social+psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="cognition" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/cognition/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Fairness as Appropriateness</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/09/01/fairness-as-appropriateness.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/09/01/fairness-as-appropriateness.aspx</id><published>2009-09-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-09-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;By Grégoire Mallard, Michèle Lamont, Joshua Guetzkow&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Epistemological differences fuel continuous and frequently divisive debates in the social sciences and the humanities. Sociologists have yet to consider how such differences affect peer evaluation. The empirical literature has studied distributive fairness, but neglected how epistemological differences affect perception of fairness in decision making. The normative literature suggests that evaluators should overcome their epistemological differences by ‘‘translating’’ their preferred standards into general criteria of evaluation. However, little is known about how procedural fairness actually operates. Drawing on eighty-one interviews with panelists serving on five multidisciplinary fellowship competitions in the social sciences and the humanities, we show that (1) Evaluators generally draw on four epistemological styles to make arguments in favor of and against proposals. These are the constructivist, comprehensive, positivist, and utilitarian styles; and (2) Peer reviewers define a fair decision-making process as one in which panelists engage in ‘‘cognitive contextualization,’’ that is, use epistemological styles most appropriate to the field or discipline of the proposal under review.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://sth.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/34/5/573?rss=1"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=587" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>ajstasic</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/ajstasic.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>Empathic forecasting: How do we predict other people's feelings?</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/09/01/empathic-forecasting-how-do-we-predict-other-people-s-feelings.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/09/01/empathic-forecasting-how-do-we-predict-other-people-s-feelings.aspx</id><published>2009-09-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-09-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;By Pollmann, Monique; Finkenauer, Catrin&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When making affective forecasts, people commit the impact bias. They overestimate the impact an emotional event has on their affective experience. In three studies we show that people also commit the impact bias when making empathic forecasts, affective forecasts for someone else. They overestimate the impact an emotional event has on someone else&amp;#39;s affective experience (Study 1), they do so for friends and strangers (Study 2), and they do so when other sources of information are available (Study 3). Empathic forecasting accuracy, the correlation between one person&amp;#39;s empathic forecast and another person&amp;#39;s actual affective experience, was lower than between-person forecasting correspondence, the correlation between one person&amp;#39;s empathic forecast and another person&amp;#39;s affective forecast. Empathic forecasts do not capture other people&amp;#39;s actual experience very well but are similar to what other people forecast for themselves. This may enhance understanding between people. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www.swetswise.com.proxy.uchicago.edu/eAccess/viewAbstract.do?articleID=41640973"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Image from &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ortizmj12/2225642622/"&gt;Flickr Creative Commons&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=597" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>ajstasic</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/ajstasic.aspx</uri></author><category term="culture" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/culture/default.aspx" /><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="social psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/social+psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="PHILOSOPHY" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/PHILOSOPHY/default.aspx" /><category term="ethics" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/ethics/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>The Romance of Learning from Disagreement. The Effect of Cohesiveness and Disagreement on Knowledge Sharing Behavior and Individual Performance Within Teams</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/09/24/the-romance-of-learning-from-disagreement-the-effect-of-cohesiveness-and-disagreement-on-knowledge-sharing-behavior-and-individual-performance-within-teams.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/09/24/the-romance-of-learning-from-disagreement-the-effect-of-cohesiveness-and-disagreement-on-knowledge-sharing-behavior-and-individual-performance-within-teams.aspx</id><published>2009-09-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-09-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;By Marianne van Woerkom and Karin Sanders | Journal of Business and Psychology&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#39;&lt;b&gt;Purpose&lt;/b&gt;&amp;nbsp; The purpose of this study was to explore the effects of disagreement and cohesiveness on knowledge sharing in teams, and on the performance of individual team members.&lt;br /&gt;Design/methodology/approach&amp;nbsp; Data were obtained from a survey among 1,354 employees working in 126 teams in 17 organizations.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Findings&lt;/b&gt;&amp;nbsp; The results show that cohesiveness has a positive effect on the exchange of advice between team members and on openness for sharing opinions, whereas disagreement has a negative effect on openness for sharing opinions. Furthermore, the exchange of advice in a team has a positive effect on the performance of individual team members and acts as a mediator between cohesiveness and individual performance.&lt;br /&gt;Implications&amp;nbsp; Managers who want to stimulate knowledge sharing processes and performance within work teams may be advised to take measures to prevent disagreement between team members and to enhance team cohesiveness.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Originality/value&lt;/b&gt;&amp;nbsp; Although some gurus in organizational learning claim that disagreement has a positive effect on group processes such as knowledge sharing and team learning, this study does not support this claim.&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www.springerlink.com/content/701t381632k71113/?p=621dd5bc1e524878ac16e29de16fc67c&amp;amp;pi=1"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=604" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>ajstasic</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/ajstasic.aspx</uri></author><category term="Wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/Wisdom/default.aspx" /><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /><category term="cognition" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/cognition/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>A Process Model of Organizational Change in Cultural Context (OC3 Model)</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/09/01/a-process-model-of-organizational-change-in-cultural-context-oc3-model.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/09/01/a-process-model-of-organizational-change-in-cultural-context-oc3-model.aspx</id><published>2009-09-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-09-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;By Gail F. Latta&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Change resides at the heart of leadership. Organizational culture is one of many situational variables that have emerged as pivotal in determining the success of leaders&amp;#39; efforts to implement change initiatives. This article introduces a process model of organizational change in cultural context (OC3 Model) derived from ethnographic analysis. The model delineates the differential impact of organizational culture at every stage of change implementation. Eight stages of cultural influence are identified and illustrated. Research propositions are stated to encourage refinement of the model. Theoretical and practical implications for leadership are explored; applications for resolving organizational immunity to change are discussed. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://jlo.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/16/1/19"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=605" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>ajstasic</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/ajstasic.aspx</uri></author><category term="culture" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/culture/default.aspx" /><category term="Wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/Wisdom/default.aspx" /><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Autonomy, Experience, and Reflection. On a Neglected Aspect of Personal Autonomy</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/09/01/autonomy-experience-and-reflection-on-a-neglected-aspect-of-personal-autonomy.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/09/01/autonomy-experience-and-reflection-on-a-neglected-aspect-of-personal-autonomy.aspx</id><published>2009-09-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-09-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;By Claudia Blöser, Aron Schöpf and Marcus Willaschek&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The aim of this paper is to suggest that a necessary condition of autonomy has not been sufficiently recognized in the literature: the capacity to critically reflect on one’s practical attitudes (desires, preferences, values, etc.) in the light of new experiences. It will be argued that most prominent accounts of autonomy—ahistorical as well as history-sensitive—have either altogether failed to recognize this condition or at least failed to give an explicit account of it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www.springerlink.com/content/18709x701375t804/?p=dc7caee83f4c4c68886ccc76a1ce5291&amp;amp;pi=0"&gt;article. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=607" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>ajstasic</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/ajstasic.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="knowledge" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/knowledge/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>The Validity of a New, Self-report Measure of Multiple Intelligence</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/09/01/the-validity-of-a-new-self-report-measure-of-multiple-intelligence.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/09/01/the-validity-of-a-new-self-report-measure-of-multiple-intelligence.aspx</id><published>2009-09-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-09-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;By Adrian Furnham&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In all, 187 participants completed a new, self-report measure of eight multiple intelligences (Haselbauer 2005), a General Knowledge test (Irwing et al. Personality and Individual Differences 30:857–871, 2001), a measure of Approaches to Learning Styles (Biggs 1987), a measure of the Big Five personality traits (Costa and McCrae 1992), as well as gave their own estimated scores on the Gardner (1999) multiple intelligences. Alpha co-efficients were modest with only three of the eight test-derived, multiple intelligence scores being over .70. ‘Linguistic’ and Mathematical intelligence alone were correlated with General Knowledge. Five of the eight ‘intelligences’ were correlated both with Extraversion and Openness. Regressions indicated that ‘Intrapersonal intelligence’ was closely linked with Stability and Conscientiousness; ‘Interpersonal intelligence’ with Extraversion; ‘Linguistic intelligence’ with Openness; ‘Mathematical intelligence’ with Agreeableness and Conscientiousness. Correlations between self-estimated and test-derived emotional intelligence showed correlations ranging from r = .18 to r = .56 for similar type ‘intelligences’. This study provides modest evidence for the concurrent and construct validity of this measure. It requires more psychometric evidence of validity before it is used. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www.springerlink.com/content/g668u4742n770077/?p=4058789c5cb449bdb3d5413fb440a954&amp;amp;pi=1"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=608" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>ajstasic</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/ajstasic.aspx</uri></author><category term="Wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/Wisdom/default.aspx" /><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="intelligence" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/intelligence/default.aspx" /><category term="cognition" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/cognition/default.aspx" /><category term="free will" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/free+will/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Bringing Meaning to Numbers: The Impact of Evaluative Categories on Decisions</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/06/bringing-meaning-to-numbers-the-impact-of-evaluative-categories-on-decisions.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/06/bringing-meaning-to-numbers-the-impact-of-evaluative-categories-on-decisions.aspx</id><published>2009-09-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-09-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ellen Peters, Nathan F. Dieckmann, Daniel Västfjäll, C. K. Mertz, Paul Slovic, Judith H. Hibbard&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; Decision makers are often quite poor at using numeric information in
decisions. The results of 4 experiments demonstrate that a manipulation
of evaluative meaning (i.e., the extent to which an attribute can be
mapped onto a good/bad scale; this manipulation is accomplished through
the addition of visual boundary lines and evaluative labels to a
graphical format) has a robust influence in health judgments and
choices and across diverse adult populations. The manipulation resulted
in greater use of numeric quality-of-care information in judgments and
less reliance on an irrelevant affective state among the less numerate.
Recall results for provided quality-of-care numbers suggested that the
manipulation did not influence depth of number processing with the
exception of cost information that was not remembered as well. Results
of a reaction-time paradigm revealed that feelings were more accessible
than thoughts in the presence of the manipulation, suggesting that the
effect may be due, at least in part, to an affective mechanism. Numeric
information is often provided in decisions, but may not be usable by
consumers without assistance from information providers. Implications
for consumer decision making and the functions of affect are discussed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/xap/15/3/213/"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=699" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /><category term="practical wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/practical+wisdom/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>"Fighting with Proverbs": Kasena Women's (Re)Definition of Female Personhood through Proverbial Jesting</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/09/01/quot-fighting-with-proverbs-quot-kasena-women-s-re-definition-of-female-personhood-through-proverbial-jesting.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/09/01/quot-fighting-with-proverbs-quot-kasena-women-s-re-definition-of-female-personhood-through-proverbial-jesting.aspx</id><published>2009-09-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-09-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;By Helen Yitah&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This study is an attempt to document and critically explore what I term the &amp;quot;proverbial revolt&amp;quot; of Kasena women from northern Ghana. The women take advantage of a socially sanctioned medium, the joking relationship that exists between a Kasena woman and her husband&amp;#39;s siblings or kin of the same generation, to subvert, contradict, and deconstruct the sexist ideology in Kasem proverbs. In the process, they create a corpus of &amp;quot;counter-proverbs&amp;quot; by which they establish their own signifying terms. This activity is termed ka jang de memanga (lit. &amp;quot;to fight with proverbs&amp;quot;); it is an activity that Kasena, who see proverbs as the wisdom of their ancestors, would typically avoid. Using the conception of proverb as strategy, and employing the theoretical concepts of positionality, identification, and performance, I examine how perceptions of gender and female personhood are invoked, evoked, enacted, rejected, consciously reshaped, or completely transformed by these contemporary African women. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/research_in_african_literatures/summary/v040/40.3.yitah.html"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=584" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>ajstasic</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/ajstasic.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>The Crystallization of Contemporary Racial Prejudice across the Lifespan</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/08/01/the-crystallization-of-contemporary-racial-prejudice-across-the-lifespan.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/08/01/the-crystallization-of-contemporary-racial-prejudice-across-the-lifespan.aspx</id><published>2009-08-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-08-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;By P. J. Henry  and David O Sears&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#39;The conventional wisdom is that racial prejudice remains largely stable through adulthood. However, very little is known about the development of contemporary racial attitudes like symbolic racism. The growing crystallization of symbolic racism through the lifespan is tested using two data sets that measure the stability, consistency, and predictive validity of symbolic racism in samples ranging in age from young adults to the elderly. The results provide evidence that the crystallization of symbolic racism generally takes on a curvilinear trajectory across the lifespan, showing that it is already largely crystallized by voting age, that it continues to crystallize still further through adulthood and that it begins to decline in coherence in late adulthood. The results generally provide evidence confirming early speculations of symbolic racism theorists concerning the crystallization of symbolic racism across the lifespan and are discussed in terms of different theoretical perspectives on the relationship between aging and attitudes more generally.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/bpl/pops/2009/00000030/00000004/art00004"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Image from &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/sheeshoo/15552340/"&gt;Flickr Creative Commons.&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=585" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>ajstasic</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/ajstasic.aspx</uri></author><category term="culture" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/culture/default.aspx" /><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Pushing moral buttons: The interaction between personal force and intention in moral judgment</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/08/01/pushing-moral-buttons-the-interaction-between-personal-force-and-intention-in-moral-judgment.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/08/01/pushing-moral-buttons-the-interaction-between-personal-force-and-intention-in-moral-judgment.aspx</id><published>2009-08-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-08-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;By Joshua D. Greene, et al. (Joshua Green is a wisdom grantee).&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In some cases people judge it morally acceptable to sacrifice one person’s life in order to save several other lives, while in other similar cases they make the opposite judgment. Researchers have identified two general factors that may explain this phenomenon at the stimulus level: (1) the agent’s intention (i.e. whether the harmful event is intended as a means or merely foreseen as a side-effect) and (2) whether the agent harms the victim in a manner that is relatively “direct” or “personal”. Here we integrate these two classes of findings. Two experiments examine a novel personalness/directness factor that we call personal force, present when the force that directly impacts the victim is generated by the agent’s muscles (e.g., in pushing). Experiments 1a and b demonstrate the influence of personal force on moral judgment, distinguishing it from physical contact and spatial proximity. Experiments 2a and b demonstrate an interaction between personal force and intention, whereby the effect of personal force depends entirely on intention. These studies also introduce a method for controlling for people’s real-world expectations in decisions involving potentially unrealistic hypothetical dilemmas. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com.proxy.uchicago.edu/science?_ob=ArticleURL&amp;amp;_udi=B6T24-4W329F6-1&amp;amp;_user=5745&amp;amp;_coverDate=06%2F30%2F2009&amp;amp;_rdoc=1&amp;amp;_fmt=&amp;amp;_orig=search&amp;amp;_sort=d&amp;amp;_docanchor=&amp;amp;view=c&amp;amp;_acct=C000001358&amp;amp;_version=1&amp;amp;_urlVersion=0&amp;amp;_userid=5745&amp;amp;md5=a1bebbb45cf13d68643f62593910213f"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=563" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>ajstasic</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/ajstasic.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="social psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/social+psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="ethics" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/ethics/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Social Science &amp; Human Flourishing: The Scottish Enlightenment  &amp; Today</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/08/01/social-science-amp-human-flourishing-the-scottish-enlightenment-amp-today.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/08/01/social-science-amp-human-flourishing-the-scottish-enlightenment-amp-today.aspx</id><published>2009-08-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-08-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;By Ryan P. Hanley, a wisdom grantee.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Scottish Enlightenment is commonly identified as the birthplace of modern social science. But while Scottish and contemporary social science share a commitment to empiricism, contemporary insistence on the separation of empirical analysis from normative judgment invokes a distinction unintelligible to the Scots. In this respect the methods of modern social science seem an attenuation of those of Scottish social science. A similar attenuation can be found in the modern aspiration to judge the outcome of institutions or processes only with regard to efficiency. While the tenet that efficiency is preferable to inefficiency is central to Scottish social thought, the Scots regarded maximization of quantifiable returns as only one among three ends that well-functioning institutions and processes promote. Scottish social science speaks also of virtue and liberty where ours speaks only of utility. This essay develops these differences in three sections. Its first section compares Scottish and contemporary understandings of social science methods. Its second section examines how these differing methodologies inform their differing conceptions of human flourishing and particularly led Scottish social science to focus on virtue and freedom in addition to wealth. The essay concludes by calling attention to three movements in social science today which might help us recover the best features of Scottish social science. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www.eupjournals.com.proxy.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.3366/E1479665108000316"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Image from &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/conner395/2170390982/"&gt;Flickr Creative Commons&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=564" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>ajstasic</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/ajstasic.aspx</uri></author><category term="Wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/Wisdom/default.aspx" /><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="social psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/social+psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="cognition" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/cognition/default.aspx" /><category term="political science" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/political+science/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>The Role of Self-Compassion in Development:  A Healthier Way to Relate to Oneself </title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/08/01/the-role-of-self-compassion-in-development-a-healthier-way-to-relate-to-oneself.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/08/01/the-role-of-self-compassion-in-development-a-healthier-way-to-relate-to-oneself.aspx</id><published>2009-08-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-08-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;By&amp;nbsp; Kristin D. Neff &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The idea that people need high self-esteem in order to be psychologically healthy is almost a truism in Western developmental psychology. Parents are told that one of their most important tasks is to nurture their children’s self-esteem. Teachers are encouraged to give all their students gold stars so that each can feel proud and special. Psychologists worry about the dangerous drop in self-esteem experienced by adolescents as they transition out of childhood and try to find ways to give teens a self-esteem boost. The assumption that high self-esteem is synonymous with well- being applies throughout the lifespan. The elderly benefit from high self-esteem as much as anyone, don’t they? The issue is not so simple. In the field of social psychology, scholars are starting to fall out of love with self-esteem. Yes, it is true that high self-esteem is associated with less depression and anxiety, as well as with greater happiness and life satisfaction. However, there are also some dark sides to high self- esteem. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://content.karger.com.proxy.uchicago.edu/ProdukteDB/produkte.asp?Aktion=ShowPDF&amp;amp;ArtikelNr=215071&amp;amp;Ausgabe=248742&amp;amp;ProduktNr=224249&amp;amp;filename=215071.pdf"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=566" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>ajstasic</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/ajstasic.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="cognition" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/cognition/default.aspx" /><category term="biology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/biology/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Rapid evolution of social learning</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/08/01/rapid-evolution-of-social-learning.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/08/01/rapid-evolution-of-social-learning.aspx</id><published>2009-08-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-08-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;By M. FRANZ &amp;amp; C. L. NUNN &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Culture is widely thought to be beneficial when social learning is less costly than individual learning and thus may explain the enormous ecological success of humans. Rogers (1988. Does biology constrain culture. Am. Anthropol. 90: 819–831) contradicted this common view by showing that the evolution of social learning does not necessarily increase the net benefits of learned behaviours in a variable environment. Using simulation experiments, we re-analysed extensions of Rogers&amp;#39; model after relaxing the assumption that genetic evolution is much slower than cultural evolution. Our results show that this assumption is crucial for Rogers&amp;#39; finding. For many parameter settings, genetic and cultural evolution occur on the same time scale, and feedback effects between genetic and cultural dynamics increase the net benefits. Thus, by avoiding the costs of individual learning, social learning can increase ecological success. Furthermore, we found that rapid evolution can limit the evolution of complex social learning strategies, which have been proposed to be widespread in animals.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the&lt;a href="http://www3.interscience.wiley.com.proxy.uchicago.edu/journal/122562433/abstract"&gt; full article&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Image from &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/athena/352434214/"&gt;Flickr Creative Commons&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=579" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>ajstasic</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/ajstasic.aspx</uri></author><category term="evolution" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/evolution/default.aspx" /><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="social psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/social+psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="intelligence" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/intelligence/default.aspx" /><category term="cognition" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/cognition/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>The social brain hypothesis and its implications for social evolution</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/08/01/the-social-brain-hypothesis-and-its-implications-for-social-evolution.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/08/01/the-social-brain-hypothesis-and-its-implications-for-social-evolution.aspx</id><published>2009-08-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-08-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;By R. I. M. Dunbar &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;The social brain hypothesis was proposed as an explanation for the fact that primates have unusually large brains for body size compared to all other vertebrates: Primates evolved large brains to manage their unusually complex social systems. Although this proposal has been generalized to all vertebrate taxa as an explanation for brain evolution, recent analyses suggest that the social brain hypothesis takes a very different form in other mammals and birds than it does in anthropoid primates. In primates, there is a quantitative relationship between brain size and social group size (group size is a monotonic function of brain size), presumably because the cognitive demands of sociality place a constraint on the number of individuals that can be maintained in a coherent group. In other mammals and birds, the relationship is a qualitative one: Large brains are associated with categorical differences in mating system, with species that have pairbonded mating systems having the largest brains. It seems that anthropoid primates may have generalized the bonding processes that characterize monogamous pairbonds to other non-reproductive relationships (&amp;#39;friendships&amp;#39;), thereby giving rise to the quantitative relationship between group size and brain size that we find in this taxon. This raises issues about why bonded relationships are cognitively so demanding (and, indeed, raises questions about what a bonded relationship actually is), and when and why primates undertook this change in social style.&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www.informaworld.com.proxy.uchicago.edu/smpp/content%7Edb=all%7Econtent=a912879712"&gt;aritcle&lt;/a&gt;. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Image from &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/aidy87/3255970960/"&gt;Flickr Creative Commons&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=580" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>ajstasic</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/ajstasic.aspx</uri></author><category term="evolution" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/evolution/default.aspx" /><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /><category term="cognition" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/cognition/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Discounting future green: Money versus the environment</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/08/01/discounting-future-green-money-versus-the-environment.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/08/01/discounting-future-green-money-versus-the-environment.aspx</id><published>2009-08-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-08-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;In 3 studies, participants made choices between hypothetical financial,
environmental, and health gains and losses that took effect either
immediately or with a delay of 1 or 10 years. In all 3 domains, choices
indicated that gains were discounted more than losses. There were no
significant differences in the discounting of monetary and
environmental outcomes, but health gains were discounted more and
health losses were discounted less than gains or losses in the other 2
domains. Correlations between implicit discount rates for these
different choices suggest that discount rates are influenced more by
the valence of outcomes (gains vs. losses) than by domain (money,
environment, or health). Overall, results indicate that when
controlling as many factors as possible, at short to medium delays,
environmental outcomes are discounted in a similar way to financial
outcomes, which is good news for researchers and policy makers alike.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;by &lt;span class="rdLinkItem"&gt;Hardisty, David J.;&lt;/span&gt;
					
						
						
						 
						&lt;span class="rdLinkItem"&gt;Weber, Elke U.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/xge/138/3/329/"&gt;Read the article. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div id="rdcAuthors"&gt;
					
				
			&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=553" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Thinking about Language</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/08/01/thinking-about-language.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/08/01/thinking-about-language.aspx</id><published>2009-08-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-08-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;By Robin Dunbar.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &amp;quot;Just what makes the difference between apes (and especially chimpanzees) and humans has remained one of the perennial questions that has bedeviled much of the debate in comparative psychology, as well as primatology and anthropology, over most of the past century. Language, of course, is one answer, but in the end what really underpins language is cognition. In Origins of Human Communication (originally presented as the Jean Nicod Lectures in Paris in 2006), Michael Tomasello offers us a glimpse of where he thinks the real answer probably lies. His starting point is that language has its basis in communication, and that communication is, at root, cooperative rather than manipulative. The other key prong of his attack is the claim that human language evolved from an essentially gestural precursor, not from a vocal one.&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www.journals.uchicago.edu.proxy.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086/600052"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Image from &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/carbonnyc/3306486573/"&gt;Flickr Creative Commons. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=557" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>ajstasic</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/ajstasic.aspx</uri></author><category term="cognition" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/cognition/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>The Developmental Etiology of High IQ</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/08/01/the-developmental-etiology-of-high-iq.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/08/01/the-developmental-etiology-of-high-iq.aspx</id><published>2009-08-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-08-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;By Angela M. Brant and et al.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;quot;The genetic and environmental trends in IQ development were assessed in 483 same-sex twin pairs in the Colorado longitudinal twin study using maximum-likelihood model-fitting analysis. The twins were assessed periodically from ages 1 to 16. Results show a decreasing influence of shared environment and an increasing influence of heritability across development, with large and increasing age to age stability of genetic influences. Non-shared environment contributes almost exclusively to age to age change. Similar analyses were conducted designating the top 15% of the sample as having high IQ at each age. The developmental etiology of high IQ did not significantly differ from that found for the continuous measure in this relatively novel analysis. These results demonstrate early stability in etiological influences on IQ and have potential implications for gene-finding efforts, suggesting that samples selected for high IQ can be used to find genetic variation that will be applicable to the full range of the IQ distribution, although conclusive demonstration that the same genes are indeed involved was beyond the scope of this study.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www.springerlink.com.proxy.uchicago.edu/content/t77852n52t334631/?p=59af2439569942ffa19c51d8ce2e14ad&amp;amp;pi=5"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=558" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>ajstasic</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/ajstasic.aspx</uri></author><category term="Wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/Wisdom/default.aspx" /><category term="intelligence" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/intelligence/default.aspx" /><category term="knowledge" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/knowledge/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Mindfulness and Psychotherapy</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/09/24/mindfulness-and-psychotherapy.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/09/24/mindfulness-and-psychotherapy.aspx</id><published>2009-08-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-08-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;By Ann Gleig &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;This edited collection provides a useful and clear overview of the increasing adoption of mindfulness practice by psychotherapeutic and medical communities. Defining mindfulness as the &amp;quot;awareness of present experience with acceptance,&amp;quot; the central question of this volume is how to integrate mindfulness into different schools of psychotherapy, such as cognitive-behavioral, humanistic, and psychodynamic. Eleven chapters thoughtfully interweave clinical vignettes, empirical data, and practical instructions to apply mindfulness to issues such as depression, anxiety, and trauma and to promote mindfulness practice for both therapist and patient. What makes a book written primarily &amp;quot;by clinicians for clinicians&amp;quot; interesting to religious studies scholars? Two themes are particularly relevant: first, as Buddhist scholar Oldenski notes in his solid overview of the traditional Buddhist context of mindfulness, the contemporary appearance of mindfulness in Western psychotherapy is a significant instance of the modern cultural adaptation of Buddhism. Second, several of the essays imply that a mindfulness-based psychotherapy can itself become a spiritual practice in fostering qualities such as connection, acceptance, love, and truth. The question remains as to whether the psychotherapeutic embrace of mindfulness should be problematized for diluting Buddhism or celebrated for elevating psychotherapy. One thing is clear though: it is the commitment to the alleviation of suffering that fundamentally unites the Buddha (framed in these essays as essentially a psychologist) and contemporary psychotherapists.&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/122554534/HTMLSTART"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=609" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>ajstasic</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/ajstasic.aspx</uri></author><category term="Wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/Wisdom/default.aspx" /><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /><category term="cognition" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/cognition/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Language, thought, and color: Whorf was half right</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/09/24/language-thought-and-color-whorf-was-half-right.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/09/24/language-thought-and-color-whorf-was-half-right.aspx</id><published>2009-08-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-08-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;By Terry Regier and Paul Kay&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;The Whorf hypothesis holds that we view the world filtered through the semantic categories of our native language. Over the years, consensus has oscillated between embrace and dismissal of this hypothesis. Here, we review recent findings on the naming and perception of color, and argue that in this semantic domain the Whorf hypothesis is half right, in two different ways: (1) language influences color perception primarily in half the visual field, and (2) color naming across languages is shaped by both universal and language-specific forces. To the extent that these findings generalize to other semantic domains they suggest a possible resolution of the debate over the Whorf hypothesis.&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www.cell.com/trends/cognitive-sciences/abstract/S1364-6613%2809%2900145-4"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=606" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>ajstasic</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/ajstasic.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /><category term="cognition" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/cognition/default.aspx" /><category term="neuroscience" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/neuroscience/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Evolution and Emergence: Systems, Organizations, Persons</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/08/01/evolution-and-emergence-systems-organizations-persons.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/08/01/evolution-and-emergence-systems-organizations-persons.aspx</id><published>2009-08-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-08-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;By Amos Yong | Religious Studies Review &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;This volume extends the conversation opened up by the series of volumes produced by the jointly sponsored Vatican Observatory and the Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences (Berkeley, CA) ventures and by a number of previous publications on the topic of emergence by Oxford University Press. Between the introduction and postscript penned by the editors are fourteen essays/chapters almost equally spread out in the three sections on the philosophy, science (particularly at the levels of physics, biology, the cognitive neurosciences, and psychology), and theology of emergence at the various levels announced in the book&amp;#39;s subtitle. Almost every essay lays out the conceptual or empirical terrain and explores various aspects of the notion of emergence before making constructive proposals. Perhaps a central thread throughout the book is the discussion and critical analysis of reductionism in its many guises, although there are also contributors in the middle &amp;quot;science&amp;quot; section who recognize that not all of these guises should be too easily dismissed without attempted retrievals. Put positively, however, the quest to overcome reductionisms motivates the search for appropriate models, conceptual resources, and empirical intimations for downward causation, understood variously, along the hierarchy of the sciences. The &amp;quot;science of emergence&amp;quot; is far from secure, but the careful work accomplished by the authors—many well known in the science-religion conversation—surely puts us a few steps further along in the discussion than we were before the appearance of this book.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/122554413/HTMLSTART"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=603" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>ajstasic</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/ajstasic.aspx</uri></author><category term="evolution" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/evolution/default.aspx" /><category term="biology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/biology/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Neural Correlates of Value, Risk, and Risk Aversion Contributing to Decision Making under Risk</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/11/24/neural-correlates-of-value-risk-and-risk-aversion-contributing-to-decision-making-under-risk.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/11/24/neural-correlates-of-value-risk-and-risk-aversion-contributing-to-decision-making-under-risk.aspx</id><published>2009-08-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-08-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;/b&gt;
	
	
	
	
	

&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="margin-bottom:0in;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight:normal;"&gt;George
I. Christopoulos,&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;sup&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight:normal;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight:normal;"&gt;
Philippe N. Tobler,&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;sup&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight:normal;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight:normal;"&gt;
Peter Bossaerts,&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;sup&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight:normal;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight:normal;"&gt;
Raymond J. Dolan,&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;sup&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight:normal;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight:normal;"&gt;
and Wolfram Schultz&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="margin-bottom:0in;"&gt;Decision making under risk is central to human behavior. Economic&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;decision theory suggests that value, risk, and risk aversion&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;influence choice behavior. Although previous studies identified&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;neural correlates of decision parameters, the contribution of&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;these correlates to actual choices is unknown. In two different&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;experiments, participants chose between risky and safe options.&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;We identified discrete blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) correlates&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;of value and risk in the ventral striatum and anterior cingulate,&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;respectively. Notably, increasing inferior frontal gyrus activity&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;to low risk and safe options correlated with higher risk aversion.&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;Importantly, the combination of these BOLD responses effectively&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;decoded the behavioral choice. Striatal value and cingulate&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;risk responses increased the probability of a risky choice,&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;whereas inferior frontal gyrus responses showed the inverse&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;relationship. These findings suggest that the BOLD correlates&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;of decision factors are appropriate for an ideal observer to&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;detect behavioral choices. More generally, these biological&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;data contribute to the validity of the theoretical decision&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;parameters for actual decisions under risk.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="margin-bottom:0in;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;Read &lt;a href="http://www.jneurosci.org/cgi/gca?allch=&amp;amp;SEARCHID=1&amp;amp;FULLTEXT=neural+correlates&amp;amp;FIRSTINDEX=0&amp;amp;hits=10&amp;amp;RESULTFORMAT=&amp;amp;gca=jneuro%3B29%2F40%2F12574&amp;amp;allchb="&gt;the article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=666" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="behavior" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/behavior/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Why Compare?</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/02/18/why-compare.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/02/18/why-compare.aspx</id><published>2009-08-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-08-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;By R. Radhakrishnan. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The purpose of this essay is to complicate the rationale that informs &amp;quot;our&amp;quot; will to comparative knowledge. Why do we want to compare when we are not sure who the &amp;quot;we&amp;quot; is? Any act of comparison, despite the best of intentions, is bound to flounder in that perilous and nameless region that lies between Identity and Difference. Unless &amp;quot;between-ness&amp;quot; is acknowledged as a serious epistemological and political issue in its own right, projects of comparison are doomed to profound self mystification. This essay argues that not only are comparative endeavors mired in relationships of uneven and asymmetrical power that they are unconscious of, but are also symptoms of a developmental epistemology that denies coevalness among the many worlds that constitute our one world. The essay suggests not that we abandon comparisons altogether, but rather that we undertake comparisons in the name of a multilateral relationality that opposes any form of hegemonic centrism.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read &lt;a href="http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/new_literary_history/summary/v040/40.3.radhakrishnan.html"&gt;the article.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=803" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Cait</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/Cait.aspx</uri></author><category term="knowledge" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/knowledge/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>The Material World of Comparison</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/02/18/the-material-world-of-comparison.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/02/18/the-material-world-of-comparison.aspx</id><published>2009-08-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-08-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;By Pheng Cheah. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If comparison is a fundamental activity of human consciousness, then what is its stimulus internal to consciousness or the human spirit or something that comes from the external or objective world? This essay traces the genealogy of the idea that comparison is an activity that forms consciousness in some canonical texts of modern philosophy (Rousseau, Kant, and Hegel) and the elaboration of this idea into a stimulus for the awakening of anticolonial consciousness in radical postcolonial nationalist literature (Jose Rizal, Pramoedya Ananta Toer, and Michelle Cliff). It then argues that in contemporary globalization, comparison is no longer a critical activity but a material infrastructure that undermines the formation of a shared world even as it makes us more connected in unprecedented ways.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read &lt;a href="http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/new_literary_history/summary/v040/40.3.cheah.html"&gt;the article.&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=804" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Cait</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/Cait.aspx</uri></author><category term="cognition" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/cognition/default.aspx" /><category term="knowledge" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/knowledge/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Feeling Validated Versus Being Correct: A Meta-Analysis of Selective Exposure to Information</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/06/feeling-validated-versus-being-correct-a-meta-analysis-of-selective-exposure-to-information.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/06/feeling-validated-versus-being-correct-a-meta-analysis-of-selective-exposure-to-information.aspx</id><published>2009-07-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-07-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p class="authorGroup"&gt;William Hart, Dolores Albarracín, Alice H. Eagly, Inge Brechan, Matthew J. Lindberg, Lisa Merrill&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="authorGroup"&gt;A meta-analysis assessed whether exposure to information is guided by defense or accuracy motives. The&lt;br /&gt;studies examined information preferences in relation to attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors in situations that&lt;br /&gt;provided choices between congenial information, which supported participants’ pre-existing attitudes,&lt;br /&gt;beliefs, or behaviors, and uncongenial information, which challenged these tendencies. Analyses indicated&lt;br /&gt;a moderate preference for congenial over uncongenial information (d&amp;nbsp; 0.36). As predicted, this&lt;br /&gt;congeniality bias was moderated by variables that affect the strength of participants’ defense motivation&lt;br /&gt;and accuracy motivation. In support of the importance of defense motivation, the congeniality bias was&lt;br /&gt;weaker when participants’ attitudes, beliefs, or behaviors were supported prior to information selection;&lt;br /&gt;when participants’ attitudes, beliefs, or behaviors were not relevant to their values or not held with&lt;br /&gt;conviction; when the available information was low in quality; when participants’ closed-mindedness&lt;br /&gt;was low; and when their confidence in the attitude, belief, or behavior was high. In support of the&lt;br /&gt;importance of accuracy motivation, an uncongeniality bias emerged when uncongenial information was&lt;br /&gt;relevant to accomplishing a current goal.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="authorGroup"&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=fulltext.printArticle&amp;amp;jcode=bul&amp;amp;vol=135&amp;amp;issue=4&amp;amp;format=html&amp;amp;page=555&amp;amp;language=eng"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=698" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /><category term="intelligence" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/intelligence/default.aspx" /><category term="practical wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/practical+wisdom/default.aspx" /><category term="knowledge" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/knowledge/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Medial cortex activity, self-reflection and depression</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/11/medial-cortex-activity-self-reflection-and-depression.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/11/medial-cortex-activity-self-reflection-and-depression.aspx</id><published>2009-07-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-07-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;
Marcia K. Johnson&lt;span style="font-weight:normal;"&gt;, 
&lt;/span&gt;Susan Nolen-Hoeksema&lt;span style="font-weight:normal;"&gt;, 
&lt;/span&gt;Karen J. Mitchell&lt;span style="font-weight:normal;"&gt; and 
&lt;/span&gt;Yael Levin&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we investigated&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;neural activity associated with self-reflection in depressed&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;[current major depressive episode (MDE)] and healthy control&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;participants, focusing on medial cortex areas previously shown&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;to be associated with self-reflection. Both the MDE and healthy&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;control groups showed greater activity in anterior medial cortex&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;(medial frontal gyrus, anterior cingulate gyrus) when cued to&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;think about hopes and aspirations compared with duties and obligations,&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;and greater activity in posterior medial cortex (precuneus,&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;posterior cingulate) when cued to think about duties and obligations&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;(Experiment 1). However, the MDE group showed less activity&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;than controls in the same area of medial frontal cortex when&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;self-referential cues were more ambiguous with respect to valence&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;(Experiment 2), and less deactivation in a non-self-referential&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;condition in both experiments. Furthermore, individual differences&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;in rumination were positively correlated with activity in both&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;anterior and posterior medial cortex during non-self-referential&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;conditions. These results provide converging evidence for a&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;dissociation of anterior and posterior medial cortex depending&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;on the focus of self-relevant thought. They also provide neural&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;evidence consistent with behavioral findings that depression&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;is associated with disruption of positively valenced thoughts&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;in response to ambiguous cues, and difficulty disengaging from&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;self-reflection when it is appropriate to do so. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://scan.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/4/4/313"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=727" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="social psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/social+psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="neuroscience" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/neuroscience/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Proactivity Directed Toward the Team and Organization: The Role of Leadership, Commitment and Role-breadth Self-efficacy</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/07/proactivity-directed-toward-the-team-and-organization-the-role-of-leadership-commitment-and-role-breadth-self-efficacy.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/07/proactivity-directed-toward-the-team-and-organization-the-role-of-leadership-commitment-and-role-breadth-self-efficacy.aspx</id><published>2009-07-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-07-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="name"&gt;&lt;span class="forenames"&gt;Karoline&lt;/span&gt;
					&lt;span class="surname"&gt;Strauss&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span class="name"&gt;&lt;span class="forenames"&gt;Mark A.&lt;/span&gt;
					&lt;span class="surname"&gt;Griffin&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;
          &lt;/span&gt; and &lt;span class="name"&gt;&lt;span class="forenames"&gt;Alannah E.&lt;/span&gt;
					&lt;span class="surname"&gt;Rafferty&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Employees&amp;#39; proactive behaviour is increasingly important for
organizations seeking to adapt in uncertain economic environments. This
study examined the link between leadership and proactive behaviour. We
differentiated between organizational leadership and team leadership
and proposed that transformational leadership by team leaders would
enhance commitment to the team, which would predict team member
proactivity. In contrast, transformational leadership by leaders of the
organization would enhance commitment to the organization, which we
expected to predict organization member proactivity. Transformational
leadership on both levels was expected to increase employees&amp;#39;
role-breadth self-efficacy, the confidence necessary to engage in
proactive behaviour. Our results demonstrate the importance of
leadership as an antecedent of proactive work behaviour and suggest
that leadership at different levels influences proactivity via
different mediators. Transformational team leaders seem to facilitate
proactivity by increasing employees&amp;#39; confidence to initiate change.
Transformational organizational leaders on the other hand increase
proactivity by enhancing employees&amp;#39; commitment to the organization.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www3.interscience.wiley.com.proxy.uchicago.edu/journal/120736723/abstract?CRETRY=1&amp;amp;SRETRY=0"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=710" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="Wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/Wisdom/default.aspx" /><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /><category term="leadership" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/leadership/default.aspx" /><category term="organizational behavior" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/organizational+behavior/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Valuing Knowledge: A Deontological Approach </title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/07/29/valuing-knowledge-a-deontological-approach.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/07/29/valuing-knowledge-a-deontological-approach.aspx</id><published>2009-07-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-07-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;The fact that we ought to prefer what is comparatively more likely to
be good, I argue, does, contrary to consequentialism, not rest on any
evaluative facts. It is, in this sense, a deontological requirement. As
such it is the basis of our valuing those things which are in
accordance with it. We value acting (and believing) well, i.e. we value
acting (and believing) as we ought to act (and to believe). In this
way, despite the fact that our interest in justification depends on our
interest in truth, we value believing with justification on
non-instrumental grounds. A deontological understanding of
justification, thus, solves the Value of Knowledge Problem.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;by Christian&amp;nbsp;Piller&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read &lt;a href="http://www.springerlink.com/content/p3372h5405271012/?p=14f418d7e16d49d39d65f7df7d0ba5f7&amp;amp;pi=4"&gt;the article. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=548" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="ethics" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/ethics/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Neuroscience: Knowledge rewards</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/07/01/neuroscience-knowledge-rewards.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/07/01/neuroscience-knowledge-rewards.aspx</id><published>2009-07-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-07-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Monkeys like to know the size of rewards coming their way, and, in the brain, this desire is signalled by the same dopamine neurons that signal primitive rewards like sex and food.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ethan Bromberg-Martin and Okihide Hikosaka of the National Eye Institute in Bethesda, Maryland, trained two monkeys to glance at one of two targets on a computer screen in order to receive a drink reward, which was randomly large or small. When one target included information about reward size the monkeys preferred to go for that target, rather than be surprised by a randomly sized reward.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The scientists recorded from single neurons in the brain&amp;#39;s &amp;#39;reward&amp;#39; circuitry and found that they fired when the monkeys learned information about the future. This suggests that the act of prediction may be intrinsically rewarding.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Read the &lt;a href="http://www.nature.com.proxy.uchicago.edu/nature/journal/v460/n7254/full/460438f.html"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Image from &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/stevehopson/350002649/"&gt;Flickr Creative Commons&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=549" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>ajstasic</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/ajstasic.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>From Rational to Wise Action: Recasting Our Theories of Entrepreneurship </title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/08/04/from-rational-to-wise-action-recasting-our-theories-of-entrepreneurship.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/08/04/from-rational-to-wise-action-recasting-our-theories-of-entrepreneurship.aspx</id><published>2009-07-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-07-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="AbstractHeading"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;In this article, I argue
that if we challenge some tacit assumptions of narrow rationality that
endure in much of entrepreneurial studies, we can elevate
entrepreneurial ethics beyond mere external constraints on rational
action, and move toward fuller integration of ethics as an intrinsic
part of the process of value creation itself. To this end, I propose
the concept of &lt;i&gt;practical wisdom&lt;/i&gt; as a framework for exploring
entrepreneurial decision making and action that can broaden the scope
of our research to recognize entrepreneurship as an inherently
normative enterprise. Specifically, I suggest that a framework built
upon a concept of practical wisdom enables us to adopt a richer and
more complex view of entrepreneurial decision making that is well
suited to the dynamic and uncertain context of entrepreneurship.
Further, this framework enriches our view of entrepreneurial ethics to
include consideration of the personal character, values, and purpose of
the entrepreneur. By examining entrepreneurship through a lens of
practical wisdom, we can open up new avenues of fruitful inquiry for
scholars of entrepreneurship.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;by Laura&amp;nbsp;C.&amp;nbsp;Dunham&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.springerlink.com/content/715608455n485320/?p=6480a06deb0b4bf8aa95659d083448d0&amp;amp;pi=2"&gt;Read the article. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=552" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /><category term="practical wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/practical+wisdom/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Task-dependent organization of brain regions active during rest</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/07/01/task-dependent-organization-of-brain-regions-active-during-rest.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/07/01/task-dependent-organization-of-brain-regions-active-during-rest.aspx</id><published>2009-07-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-07-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;By Howard C. Nusbaum, et al.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;The human brain demonstrates complex yet systematic patterns of neural activity at rest. We examined whether functional connectivity among those brain regions typically active during rest depends on ongoing and recent task demands and individual differences. We probed the temporal coordination among these regions during periods of language comprehension and during the rest periods that followed comprehension. Our findings show that the topography of this “rest network” varies with exogenous processing demands. The network encompassed more highly interconnected regions during rest than during listening, but also when listening to unsurprising vs. surprising information. Furthermore, connectivity patterns during rest varied as a function of recent listening experience. Individual variability in connectivity strength was associated with cognitive function: more attentive comprehenders demonstrated weaker connectivity during language comprehension, and a greater differentiation between connectivity during comprehension and rest. The regions we examined have generally been thought to form an invariant physiological and functional network whose activity reflects spontaneous cognitive processes. Our findings suggest that their function extends beyond the mediation of unconstrained thought, and that they play an important role in higher-level cognitive function&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www.pnas.org.proxy.uchicago.edu/content/106/26/10841.abstract"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=562" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>ajstasic</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/ajstasic.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="wisdom-related knowledge" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/wisdom-related+knowledge/default.aspx" /><category term="cognition" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/cognition/default.aspx" /><category term="biology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/biology/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Individual differences, judgment biases, and theory-of-mind: Deconstructing the intentional action side effect asymmetry</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/06/29/individual-differences-judgment-biases-and-theory-of-mind-deconstructing-the-intentional-action-side-effect-asymmetry.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/06/29/individual-differences-judgment-biases-and-theory-of-mind-deconstructing-the-intentional-action-side-effect-asymmetry.aspx</id><published>2009-07-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-07-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cokely, E.T., &amp;amp; Feltz, A.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When the side effect of an action involves moral considerations (e.g. when a chairman’s pursuit of proﬁts harms the environment) it tends to inﬂuence theory-of-mind judgments. On average, bad side effects are judged intentional whereas good side effects are judged unintentional. In a series of two experiments, we examined the largely uninvestigated roles of individual differences in this judgment asymmetry. Experiment 1 indicated that extraversion accounted for variations in intentionality judgments, controlling for a range of other general individual differences (e.g. working memory, self-control). Experiment 2 indicated that extraversion’s inﬂuence was partially mediated by more speciﬁc variations in intentional action concepts. A priming manipulation also provided causal evidence of judgment instability and bias. Results suggest that the intentional action judgment asymmetry is multiply determined, reﬂecting the interplay of individual differences and judgment biases. Implications and the roles of individual differences in judgment and decision-making research are discussed. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read&lt;a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;amp;source=web&amp;amp;ct=res&amp;amp;cd=1&amp;amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.unc.edu%2F%7Eknobe%2FCokely-Feltz.pdf&amp;amp;ei=Z-xISqiEJIHgMYeM5bQC&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHIN69tnOPTMPPGDAXFS178UJLmEg&amp;amp;sig2=FP_qiu6Y_vLT5M2obb2d2g"&gt; the pdf. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=490" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /><category term="PHILOSOPHY" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/PHILOSOPHY/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>The dynamics of development: Challenges for Bayesian reasoning</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/06/29/the-dynamics-of-development-challenges-for-bayesian-reasoning.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/06/29/the-dynamics-of-development-challenges-for-bayesian-reasoning.aspx</id><published>2009-07-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-07-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Straubinger, N., Cokely, E.T., &amp;amp; Stevens, J.R.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;According to Aristotle, humans are the rational animal. The borderline between rationality and irrationality is fundamental to many aspects of human life including the law, mental health, and language interpretation. But what is it to be rational? One answer, deeply embedded in the Western intellectual tradition since ancient Greece, is that rationality concerns reasoning according to the rules of logic – the formal theory that speciﬁes the inferential connections that hold with certainty between propositions. Piaget viewed logical reasoning as deﬁning the end-point of cognitive development; and contemporary psychology of reasoning has focussed on comparing human reasoning against logical standards. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bayesian Rationality argues that rationality is deﬁned instead by the ability to reason about uncertainty. Although people are typically poor at numerical reasoning about probability, human thought is sensitive to subtle patterns of qualitative Bayesian, probabilistic reasoning. In Chapters 1 – 4 of &lt;i&gt;Bayesian Rationality&lt;/i&gt; (Oaksford &amp;amp; Chater 2007), the case is made that cognition in general, and human everyday reasoning in particular, is best viewed as solving probabilistic, rather than logical, inference problems. In Chapters 5 – 7 the psychology of “deductive” reasoning is tackled head-on: It is argued that purportedly “logical” reasoning problems, revealing apparently irrational behaviour, are better understood from a probabilistic point of view. Data from conditional reasoning, Wason’s selection task, and syllogistic inference are captured by recasting these problems probabilistically. The probabilistic approach makes a variety of novel predictions which have been experimentally conﬁrmed. The book considers the implications of this work, and the wider “probabilistic turn” in cognitive science and artiﬁcial intelligence, for understanding human rationality. &lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;amp;source=web&amp;amp;ct=res&amp;amp;cd=1&amp;amp;url=http%3A%2F%2F141.14.165.6%2Fusers%2Fjstevens%2Fpubs%2Fstraubinger.etal.2009.pdf&amp;amp;ei=wO1ISpi-A4_UNb6T9ZEL&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHNRoEkBPc2p5ihGaUa6Djw04vMMQ&amp;amp;sig2=N9vg6th7JbozM27cjooc1g"&gt;the pdf. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=491" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="PHILOSOPHY" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/PHILOSOPHY/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>What is context?</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/07/01/what-is-context.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/07/01/what-is-context.aspx</id><published>2009-07-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-07-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;This essay is an attempt to explore the ontology of context&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;by elucidating its &lt;i&gt;uses&lt;/i&gt; in the production of new knowledges&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;out of the old. It is argued that some of the master concepts&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;in anthropological discourse, to wit nature, culture, society&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;and the individual, serve an important function of knowledge&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;production by virtue of the ways they are deployed and emplotted&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;&lt;i&gt;as&lt;/i&gt; contexts to gather together, connect and reconstitute domains&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;of data or phenomena. Drawing on the works of Marilyn Strathern&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;and Roy Wagner, among others, two symbolic-metaphysical configurations&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;of knowledge practices tentatively delineated as `Euro-American&amp;#39;&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;and `Melanesian&amp;#39; are juxtaposed in order to make explicit particular&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;modalities of contextualization. Some unexpected consequences,&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;or predicaments, of our investment in making (explicit) partial&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;connections as a privileged relational facility are then revealed;&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;among them are the relativizing effects of a self-consciously&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;universalizing epistemological strategy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;by Chi W. Huen &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read &lt;a href="http://ant.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/9/2/149"&gt;the article &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=494" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="knowledge" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/knowledge/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Philosophy in the trenches: from naturalized to experimental philosophy (of science) </title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/07/01/philosophy-in-the-trenches-from-naturalized-to-experimental-philosophy-of-science.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/07/01/philosophy-in-the-trenches-from-naturalized-to-experimental-philosophy-of-science.aspx</id><published>2009-07-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-07-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Karola Stotz&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Recent years have seen the development of an approach both to general
philosophy and philosophy of science often referred to as ‘experimental
philosophy’ or just ‘X-Phi’. Philosophers often make or presuppose
empirical claims about how people would react to hypothetical cases,
but their evidence for claims about what ‘we’ would say is usually very
limited indeed. Philosophers of science have largely relied on their
more or less intimate knowledge of their field of study to draw
hypothetical conclusions about the state of scientific concepts and the
nature of conceptual change in science. What they are lacking is some
more objective quantitative data supporting their hypotheses. A growing
number of philosophers (of science), along with a few psychologists and
anthropologists, have tried to remedy this situation by designing
experiments aimed at systematically exploring people’s reactions to
philosophically important thought experiments or scientists’ use of
their scientific concepts. Many of the results have been surprising and
some of the conclusions drawn from them have been more than a bit
provocative. This symposium attempts to provide a window into this new
field of philosophical inquiry and to show how experimental philosophy
provides crucial tools for the philosopher and encourages two-way
interactions between scientists and philosophers. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read&lt;a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&amp;amp;_udi=B6V70-4W80CBX-4&amp;amp;_user=5745&amp;amp;_rdoc=1&amp;amp;_fmt=&amp;amp;_orig=search&amp;amp;_sort=d&amp;amp;_docanchor=&amp;amp;view=c&amp;amp;_searchStrId=945485971&amp;amp;_rerunOrigin=google&amp;amp;_acct=C000001358&amp;amp;_version=1&amp;amp;_urlVersion=0&amp;amp;_userid=5745&amp;amp;md5=a8d96e5e4d9c48c740b6df258bdb6b33"&gt; the article. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=496" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="history of science" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/history+of+science/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Eliciting conceptual models to support interdisciplinary research</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/07/01/eliciting-conceptual-models-to-support-interdisciplinary-research.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/07/01/eliciting-conceptual-models-to-support-interdisciplinary-research.aspx</id><published>2009-07-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-07-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Pieter J. Beers and Pieter W.G. Bots&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Constructing interdisciplinary knowledge is particularly difficult&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;because scientific knowledge is situated in its discipline.&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;Researchers must find common ground to share, and this causes&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;high transaction costs. This article reports a method of conceptual&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;analysis to elicit, analyse and compare conceptual models used&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;by individual researchers, with the ultimate aim to facilitate&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;researchers in sharing these models. Using this method, an analyst&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;derives concepts and their mutual relations from documents,&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;and defines them in natural language. We qualitatively analysed&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;all writings of four researchers from an interdisciplinary research&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;project and validated the resulting conceptual models in semi-structured&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;interviews. The method was found to be effective in eliciting&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;concepts, even those used implicitly. The interviews also revealed&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;mechanisms by which researchers adopt new concepts or choose&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;particular terms. The analysis costs are high but not prohibitive,&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;and are shown to diminish with each researcher added to the&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;analysis. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read &lt;a href="http://jis.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/3/259"&gt;the article. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=499" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>Cognitive Ecology: Environmental Dependence of the Fitness Costs of Learning</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/07/01/cognitive-ecology-environmental-dependence-of-the-fitness-costs-of-learning.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/07/01/cognitive-ecology-environmental-dependence-of-the-fitness-costs-of-learning.aspx</id><published>2009-07-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-07-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Nigel E. Raine&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="display:inline;" class="articleText"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A recent study has found that butterflies
maintain behavioural plasticity useful to them in rare environments by
reducing associated costs in common environments. Butterflies use
innate sensory biases to locate common green hosts, but learn to modify
these preferences to find rare, red host-plants.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Learning allows animals to modify their&amp;nbsp;behaviour in response to
changes&amp;nbsp;in their environment. If the environment remains relatively
constant, however, it could be adaptive&amp;nbsp;to rely on inflexible innate
behavioural patterns to reduce (or&amp;nbsp;eliminate) costs associated with
learning &lt;a class="" name="bbib1"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="refPreview" id="refp_1"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com.proxy.uchicago.edu/science?_ob=ArticleURL&amp;amp;_udi=B6VRT-4WKC7KH-G&amp;amp;_user=5745&amp;amp;_coverDate=06%2F23%2F2009&amp;amp;_rdoc=14&amp;amp;_fmt=full&amp;amp;_orig=browse&amp;amp;_srch=doc-info%28%23toc%236243%232009%23999809987%231228049%23FLA%23display%23Volume%29&amp;amp;_cdi=6243&amp;amp;_sort=d&amp;amp;_docanchor=&amp;amp;_ct=32&amp;amp;_acct=C000001358&amp;amp;_version=1&amp;amp;_urlVersion=0&amp;amp;_userid=5745&amp;amp;md5=bffb55ef936e3908864ac6aacddc2668#bib1"&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt;.
Yet species living in relatively consistent environments can&amp;nbsp;often
adjust their phenotype successfully in alternative environments,
suggesting that the costs of maintaining phenotypic plasticity could be
low &lt;a class="" name="bbib2"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="refPreview" id="refp_2"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com.proxy.uchicago.edu/science?_ob=ArticleURL&amp;amp;_udi=B6VRT-4WKC7KH-G&amp;amp;_user=5745&amp;amp;_coverDate=06%2F23%2F2009&amp;amp;_rdoc=14&amp;amp;_fmt=full&amp;amp;_orig=browse&amp;amp;_srch=doc-info%28%23toc%236243%232009%23999809987%231228049%23FLA%23display%23Volume%29&amp;amp;_cdi=6243&amp;amp;_sort=d&amp;amp;_docanchor=&amp;amp;_ct=32&amp;amp;_acct=C000001358&amp;amp;_version=1&amp;amp;_urlVersion=0&amp;amp;_userid=5745&amp;amp;md5=bffb55ef936e3908864ac6aacddc2668#bib2"&gt;[2]&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a class="" name="bbib3"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="refPreview" id="refp_3"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com.proxy.uchicago.edu/science?_ob=ArticleURL&amp;amp;_udi=B6VRT-4WKC7KH-G&amp;amp;_user=5745&amp;amp;_coverDate=06%2F23%2F2009&amp;amp;_rdoc=14&amp;amp;_fmt=full&amp;amp;_orig=browse&amp;amp;_srch=doc-info%28%23toc%236243%232009%23999809987%231228049%23FLA%23display%23Volume%29&amp;amp;_cdi=6243&amp;amp;_sort=d&amp;amp;_docanchor=&amp;amp;_ct=32&amp;amp;_acct=C000001358&amp;amp;_version=1&amp;amp;_urlVersion=0&amp;amp;_userid=5745&amp;amp;md5=bffb55ef936e3908864ac6aacddc2668#bib3"&gt;[3]&lt;/a&gt;. In a recent&amp;nbsp;study Snell-Rood and Papaj &lt;a class="" name="bbib4"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span class="refPreview" id="refp_4"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com.proxy.uchicago.edu/science?_ob=ArticleURL&amp;amp;_udi=B6VRT-4WKC7KH-G&amp;amp;_user=5745&amp;amp;_coverDate=06%2F23%2F2009&amp;amp;_rdoc=14&amp;amp;_fmt=full&amp;amp;_orig=browse&amp;amp;_srch=doc-info%28%23toc%236243%232009%23999809987%231228049%23FLA%23display%23Volume%29&amp;amp;_cdi=6243&amp;amp;_sort=d&amp;amp;_docanchor=&amp;amp;_ct=32&amp;amp;_acct=C000001358&amp;amp;_version=1&amp;amp;_urlVersion=0&amp;amp;_userid=5745&amp;amp;md5=bffb55ef936e3908864ac6aacddc2668#bib4"&gt;[4]&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;experimentally
tested these theoretical predictions for the maintenance of phenotypic
plasticity under consistent environmental conditions...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read &lt;a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com.proxy.uchicago.edu/science?_ob=ArticleURL&amp;amp;_udi=B6VRT-4WKC7KH-G&amp;amp;_user=5745&amp;amp;_coverDate=06%2F23%2F2009&amp;amp;_rdoc=14&amp;amp;_fmt=high&amp;amp;_orig=browse&amp;amp;_srch=doc-info%28%23toc%236243%232009%23999809987%231228049%23FLA%23display%23Volume%29&amp;amp;_cdi=6243&amp;amp;_sort=d&amp;amp;_docanchor=&amp;amp;_ct=32&amp;amp;_acct=C000001358&amp;amp;_version=1&amp;amp;_urlVersion=0&amp;amp;_userid=5745&amp;amp;md5=36d3f31eed9b446bdc834d8c0bb70718"&gt;the article. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=501" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="biology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/biology/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Learning and Memory: While You Rest, Your Brain Keeps Working</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/07/01/learning-and-memory-while-you-rest-your-brain-keeps-working.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/07/01/learning-and-memory-while-you-rest-your-brain-keeps-working.aspx</id><published>2009-07-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-07-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Justin L. Vincent&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A recent study shows that brain activity recorded while the human
subject is at ‘rest’ is significantly affected by a prior learning
episode. These results suggest that understanding resting brain
activity may be critical to understanding how humans learn from
experience. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read &lt;a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com.proxy.uchicago.edu/science?_ob=ArticleURL&amp;amp;_udi=B6VRT-4WKC7KH-F&amp;amp;_user=5745&amp;amp;_coverDate=06%2F23%2F2009&amp;amp;_rdoc=13&amp;amp;_fmt=high&amp;amp;_orig=browse&amp;amp;_srch=doc-info%28%23toc%236243%232009%23999809987%231228049%23FLA%23display%23Volume%29&amp;amp;_cdi=6243&amp;amp;_sort=d&amp;amp;_docanchor=&amp;amp;_ct=32&amp;amp;_acct=C000001358&amp;amp;_version=1&amp;amp;_urlVersion=0&amp;amp;_userid=5745&amp;amp;md5=bf0197fbcc75f9961e3590520cb7ad20"&gt;the article. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=502" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="biology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/biology/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Mothers and Others</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/07/01/mothers-and-others.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/07/01/mothers-and-others.aspx</id><published>2009-07-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-07-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;span id="btAsinTitle"&gt;The Evolutionary Origins of Mutual Understanding, by Sarah Blaffer Hrdy&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; Somewhere in Africa, more than a million years ago, a line of apes
began to rear their young differently than their Great Ape ancestors.
From this new form of care came new ways of engaging and understanding
each other. How such singular human capacities evolved, and how they
have kept us alive for thousands of generations, is the mystery
revealed in this bold and wide-ranging new vision of human emotional
evolution. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  &lt;i&gt;Mothers and Others&lt;/i&gt; finds the key in the
primatologically unique length of human childhood. If the young were to
survive in a world of scarce food, they needed to be cared for, not
only by their mothers but also by siblings, aunts, fathers,
friends—and, with any luck, grandmothers. Out of this complicated and
contingent form of childrearing, Sarah Hrdy argues, came the human
capacity for understanding others. Mothers and others teach us who will
care, and who will not. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; From its opening vision of “apes on a
plane”; to descriptions of baby care among marmosets, chimpanzees,
wolves, and lions; to explanations about why men in hunter-gatherer
societies hunt together (hint: it’s called the Showing-Off Hypothesis),
&lt;i&gt;Mothers and Others&lt;/i&gt; is compellingly readable. But it is also an
intricately knit argument that ever since the Pleistocene, it has taken
a village to raise children—and how that gave our ancient ancestors the
first push on the path toward becoming emotionally modern human beings.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Link to the &lt;a href="http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog/HRDMOT.html?show=reviews"&gt;publisher&amp;#39;s&lt;/a&gt; website. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read &lt;a href="http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/324/5935/1646"&gt;a review &lt;/a&gt;from &lt;i&gt;Science. &lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=511" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="evolution" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/evolution/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Clinical reasoning: new challenges</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/07/01/clinical-reasoning-new-challenges.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/07/01/clinical-reasoning-new-challenges.aspx</id><published>2009-07-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-07-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;William&amp;nbsp;E.&amp;nbsp;Stempsey&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This article is an introduction to a special issue of &lt;i&gt;Theoretical
Medicine and Bioethics &lt;/i&gt;on clinical reasoning. Clinical reasoning
encompasses the gamut of thinking about clinical medical practice-the
evaluation and management of patients&amp;#39; medical problems. Theories of
clinical reasoning may be normative or descriptive; that is, they may
offer recommendations on how clinicians ought to think or they may
simply attempt to describe how clinicians actually do think. This
article briefly surveys these approaches in order to show the
complexity of clinical reasoning and the inadequacy of any one theory
for capturing the full richness of clinical reasoning. The authors of
this issue offer both normative and descriptive elements in their
accounts. Topics discussed include the importance for clinical
reasoning of tacit knowing, risk assessment, narrative and
hermeneutics, wisdom, and virtue epistemology.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read &lt;a href="http://www.springerlink.com/content/p732r313t7042282/"&gt;the article. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Photo from &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/minusbaby/262591726/"&gt;Flickr Creative Commons. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=539" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>Wisdom in clinical reasoning and medical practice</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/07/27/wisdom-in-clinical-reasoning-and-medical-practice.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/07/27/wisdom-in-clinical-reasoning-and-medical-practice.aspx</id><published>2009-07-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-07-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Exploring informal components of clinical reasoning, we argue that they
need to be understood via the analysis of professional wisdom. Wise
decisions are needed where action or insight is vital, but neither
everyday nor expert knowledge provides solutions. Wisdom combines
experiential, intellectual, ethical, emotional and practical
capacities; we contend that it is also more strongly social than is
usually appreciated. But many accounts of reasoning specifically rule
out such features as irrational. Seeking to illuminate how wisdom
operates, we therefore build on Aristotle&amp;#39;s work on informal reasoning.
His account of rhetorical communication shows how non-formal components
can play active parts in reasoning, retaining, or even enhancing its
reasonableness. We extend this account, applying it to forms of
healthcare-related reasoning which are characterised by the need for
wise decision-making. We then go on to explore some of what clinical
wise reasoning may mean, concluding with a case taken from
psychotherapeutic practice. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Edmondson, Ricca), Pearce, Jane, Woerner, Markus H.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read &lt;a href="http://www.springerlink.com/content/58j030566831n541/"&gt;the article. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=540" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Calculative Deliberation is Insufficient for Practical Wisdom</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/07/27/calculative-deliberation-is-insufficient-for-practical-wisdom.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/07/27/calculative-deliberation-is-insufficient-for-practical-wisdom.aspx</id><published>2009-07-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-07-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;After witnessing the trial of Adolf Eichmann, Hannah Arendt was particularly astonished not by the criminal&amp;#39;s horriﬁc deeds during the Holocaust but by his thoughtlessness. Thoughtlessness is not stupidity but the inability or failure to think from the standpoint of someone else, in Eichmann&amp;#39;s case, from the perspective of people he was knowingly sending to their deaths. What is troubling about Eichmann is that he deliberately and proudly performed his duties as required for his job. Given the climate of the times during which Eichmann lived, it is not terribly surprising that he continued to commit horrendous crimes while justifying it as a matter of necessity. Complicity is a compelling and complicated phenomenon from the ethical perspective. Yet Eichmann&amp;#39;s character ﬂaw is more than mere complicity, because he actually believed that he was acting well. Furthermore, the fact that people around him including the celebrated exemplars of his times would have fully agreed with him, adds to the ethical problem...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;by Mueller, Monica &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read &lt;a href="http://www.springerlink.com/content/rw427779g3rt1272/"&gt;the article. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=541" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="practical wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/practical+wisdom/default.aspx" /><category term="ethics" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/ethics/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Psychology and Medical Decision-Making</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/07/01/psychology-and-medical-decision-making.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/07/01/psychology-and-medical-decision-making.aspx</id><published>2009-06-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-06-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Christopher Suhler and Patricia Churchland&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;In the target article discussion of the &lt;i&gt;Changing Ethical Norms&lt;/i&gt; category, &lt;a href="http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/section?content=a911993479&amp;amp;fulltext=713240928#CIT0002"&gt;Kon (2009)&lt;/a&gt;
rightly highlights the contributions psychological research can make to
bioethics. In this commentary, we suggest that psychology can be
relevant not only at the Changing Ethical Norms level of work, but also
at the &lt;i&gt;Ideal versus Reality&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Improving Care&lt;/i&gt; levels.
Thus, our aim is not to suggest potential criticisms or refinements of
Kon&amp;#39;s proposed framework, but rather to elaborate on the potential
contributions of one particular domain of empirical research,
psychology. We provide two examples of research relevant to the sorts
of decisions encountered in the medical context: findings concerning 1)
probabilistic reasoning and 2) framing effects. We then conclude by
sketching the broader bioethical implications of such findings...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read&lt;a href="http://www.bioethics.net/journal/"&gt; the article. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=500" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>The x-phi(les): unusual insights into the nature of inquiry</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/06/30/the-x-phi-les-unusual-insights-into-the-nature-of-inquiry.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/06/30/the-x-phi-les-unusual-insights-into-the-nature-of-inquiry.aspx</id><published>2009-06-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-06-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonathan M. Weinberg and Stephen Crowley&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Experimental philosophy is often regarded as a category mistake. Even
those who reject that view typically see it as irrelevant to standard
philosophical projects. We argue that neither of these claims can be
sustained and illustrate our view with a sketch of the rich
interconnections with philosophy of science. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read &lt;a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&amp;amp;_udi=B6V70-4W9V7J9-1&amp;amp;_user=5745&amp;amp;_rdoc=1&amp;amp;_fmt=&amp;amp;_orig=search&amp;amp;_sort=d&amp;amp;_docanchor=&amp;amp;view=c&amp;amp;_searchStrId=944373712&amp;amp;_rerunOrigin=google&amp;amp;_acct=C000001358&amp;amp;_version=1&amp;amp;_urlVersion=0&amp;amp;_userid=5745&amp;amp;md5=62581638a3d89446071783ad41daa15e"&gt;the article. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=495" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="history of science" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/history+of+science/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>A quantum probability explanation for violations of ‘rational’ decision theory</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/06/02/a-quantum-probability-explanation-for-violations-of-rational-decision-theory.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/06/02/a-quantum-probability-explanation-for-violations-of-rational-decision-theory.aspx</id><published>2009-06-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-06-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;span class="name"&gt;&lt;span class="name-search"&gt;Emmanuel M. Pothos&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="xref-sep"&gt;&lt;/span&gt; 
                     &lt;span class="name"&gt;&lt;span class="name-search"&gt;and Jerome R. Busemeyer&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="xref-sep"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;p&gt;Two experimental tasks in psychology, the two-stage gambling game and
the Prisoner&amp;#39;s Dilemma game, show that people violate the sure thing
principle of decision theory. These paradoxical findings have resisted
explanation by classical decision theory for over a decade. A &lt;i&gt;quantum&lt;/i&gt;
probability model, based on a Hilbert space representation and
Schrödinger&amp;#39;s equation, provides a simple and elegant explanation for
this behaviour. The quantum model is compared with an equivalent Markov
model and it is shown that the latter is unable to account for
violations of the sure thing principle. Accordingly, it is argued that
quantum probability provides a better framework for modelling human
decision-making.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read&lt;a href="http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org.proxy.uchicago.edu/content/276/1665/2171.abstract"&gt; the article. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=472" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Big Brain: The Origins and Future of Intelligence</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/06/01/big-brain-the-origins-and-future-of-intelligence.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/06/01/big-brain-the-origins-and-future-of-intelligence.aspx</id><published>2009-06-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-06-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;In this groundbreaking look at the evolution
of our brains, eminent neuroscientists Gary Lynch and Richard Granger
uncover the mysteries of the outsize&amp;nbsp;intelligence of our ancestors, who
had bigger brains than humans living today. Weaving together history,
science, and the latest theories of artificial intelligence,&amp;nbsp;Lynch and
Granger demystify the complexities of our brains, and show us how&amp;nbsp;our
memory, cognition, and&amp;nbsp;intelligence actually function, as well as what
mechanisms in the brain can potentially be enhanced, improving on the
current design.&amp;nbsp;Author of&lt;i&gt;The Emotional Brain&lt;/i&gt;, Joseph LeDoux praised it as&amp;nbsp;&amp;quot;provocative and fascinating,&amp;quot; and, writing in the &lt;i&gt;New Scientist,&lt;/i&gt;
Willian Calvin called it &amp;quot;a popular account of how brains enlarge, in
both evolutionary and developmental terms&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;a&amp;nbsp;much needed book.&amp;quot;&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;by Gary Lynch and Richard Granger&amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="dropCap"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="dropCap"&gt;Go to &lt;a href="http://us.macmillan.com/bigbrain"&gt;the publisher. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="dropCap"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="dropCap"&gt;Read &lt;a href="http://www.journals.uchicago.edu.proxy.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086/603481"&gt;a review&lt;/a&gt; from &lt;i&gt;The Quarterly Review of Biology &lt;/i&gt;by Jeremy Kirby.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=473" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="evolution" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/evolution/default.aspx" /><category term="intelligence" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/intelligence/default.aspx" /><category term="biology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/biology/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Learning: An evolutionary analysis</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/06/02/learning-an-evolutionary-analysis.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/06/02/learning-an-evolutionary-analysis.aspx</id><published>2009-06-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-06-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="name"&gt;&lt;span class="forenames"&gt;J&lt;span class="smallcapitals"&gt;oanna&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
					&lt;span class="surname"&gt;S&lt;span class="smallcapitals"&gt;wann&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;&lt;span class="i"&gt;This paper draws on the philosophy of Karl Popper to
present a descriptive evolutionary epistemology that offers
philosophical solutions to the following related problems: &amp;#39;What
happens when learning takes place?&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;What happens in human
learning?&amp;#39; It provides a detailed analysis of how learning takes place
without any direct transfer of information from the environment to the
learner, and it significantly extends the author&amp;#39;s earlier published
work on this topic. She proposes that learning should be construed as a
special case of &amp;#39;problem solving&amp;#39; and as a fundamentally critical and
creative process in which learning organisms develop &amp;#39;expectations&amp;#39;
that are not purely an outcome of genetic inheritance or random
mutation. Human learning is then characterised with reference to:
objectified knowledge; descriptive and argumentative language;
theoretical problems; the search for error and specific limitation. If
the author&amp;#39;s evolutionary analysis of learning is valid, it would
suggest that we should, if we wish to promote learning, be wary of
corralling children and older students in environments that inhibit
autonomous activity, that discourage criticality and creativity and
generally limit opportunities for trial and error-elimination. But
education institutions, particularly those for older children and
adolescents, are very often environments of this constraining kind.
Traditionally, educationists have vastly underestimated the human
potential for imaginative criticism—because in general they have not
recognised the extent to which it lies at the heart of what humans,
including the youngest children, do in order to succeed at even the
most basic tasks.&amp;quot;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read &lt;a href="http://www3.interscience.wiley.com.proxy.uchicago.edu/journal/120173703/abstract?CRETRY=1&amp;amp;SRETRY=0"&gt;the article. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=474" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="Education" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/Education/default.aspx" /><category term="PHILOSOPHY" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/PHILOSOPHY/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>The Cultural Roots of Professional Wisdom: Towards a broader view of teacher expertise</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/06/01/the-cultural-roots-of-professional-wisdom-towards-a-broader-view-of-teacher-expertise.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/06/01/the-cultural-roots-of-professional-wisdom-towards-a-broader-view-of-teacher-expertise.aspx</id><published>2009-06-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-06-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="name"&gt;&lt;span class="forenames"&gt;D&lt;span class="smallcapitals"&gt;avid&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
					&lt;span class="surname"&gt;C&lt;span class="smallcapitals"&gt;arr&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;
          &lt;/span&gt; &amp;amp; &lt;span class="name"&gt;&lt;span class="forenames"&gt;D&lt;span class="smallcapitals"&gt;on&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
					&lt;span class="surname"&gt;S&lt;span class="smallcapitals"&gt;kinner&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="i"&gt;&amp;quot;Perhaps the most pressing issue concerning teacher
education and training since the end of the Second World War has been
that of the role of theory—or principled reflection—in professional
expertise. Here, although the main post-war architects of a new
educational professionalism clearly envisaged a key role for
theory—considering such disciplines as psychology, sociology and
philosophy as indispensable for reflective practice—there are
nevertheless well-rehearsed difficulties about crediting such
disciplines with quite the (applied) role in educational practice of
(say) physiology or anatomy in medical practice. This paper argues that
while recent developments in professional teacher education and
training may have moved on from erstwhile instrumentalist and/or
applied science (competence and other) perspectives, there may yet be a
case for further progress towards a rather more sophisticated
philosophical psychology of teacher knowledge and expertise.&amp;quot;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read &lt;a href="http://www3.interscience.wiley.com.proxy.uchicago.edu/journal/121379123/abstract"&gt;the article. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=475" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="Education" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/Education/default.aspx" /><category term="knowledge" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/knowledge/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Reason, emotion and decision-making: risk and reward computation with feeling</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/06/01/reason-emotion-and-decision-making-risk-and-reward-computation-with-feeling.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/06/01/reason-emotion-and-decision-making-risk-and-reward-computation-with-feeling.aspx</id><published>2009-06-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-06-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Steven R. Quartz &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Many models of judgment and decision-making posit distinct cognitive
and emotional contributions to decision-making under uncertainty.
Cognitive processes typically involve exact computations according to a
cost-benefit calculus, whereas emotional processes typically involve
approximate, heuristic processes that deliver rapid evaluations without
mental effort. However, it remains largely unknown what specific
parameters of uncertain decision the brain encodes, the extent to which
these parameters correspond to various decision-making frameworks, and
their correspondence to emotional and rational processes. Here, I
review research suggesting that emotional processes encode in a precise
quantitative manner the basic parameters of financial decision theory,
indicating a reorientation of emotional and cognitive contributions to
risky choice.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read &lt;a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&amp;amp;_udi=B6VH9-4W1F67W-1&amp;amp;_user=5745&amp;amp;_coverDate=05%2F31%2F2009&amp;amp;_rdoc=7&amp;amp;_fmt=high&amp;amp;_orig=browse&amp;amp;_srch=doc-info%28%23toc%236061%232009%23999869994%231024233%23FLA%23display%23Volume%29&amp;amp;_cdi=6061&amp;amp;_sort=d&amp;amp;_docanchor=&amp;amp;_ct=10&amp;amp;_acct=C000001358&amp;amp;_version=1&amp;amp;_urlVersion=0&amp;amp;_userid=5745&amp;amp;md5=22c87349184b11d7496fb57ee90231fd"&gt;the article. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=477" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /><category term="cognition" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/cognition/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Do judgments about freedom and responsibility depend on who you are? Personality differences in intuitions about compatibilism and incompatibilism</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/06/01/do-judgments-about-freedom-and-responsibility-depend-on-who-you-are-personality-differences-in-intuitions-about-compatibilism-and-incompatibilism.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/06/01/do-judgments-about-freedom-and-responsibility-depend-on-who-you-are-personality-differences-in-intuitions-about-compatibilism-and-incompatibilism.aspx</id><published>2009-06-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-06-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Adam Feltz and Edward T. Cokely&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Recently, there has been an increased interest in folk intuitions about
freedom and moral responsibility from both philosophers and
psychologists. We aim to extend our understanding of folk intuitions
about freedom and moral responsibility using an individual differences
approach. Building off previous research suggesting that there are
systematic differences in folks’ philosophically relevant intuitions,
we present new data indicating that the personality trait extraversion
predicts, to a significant extent, those who have compatibilist versus
incompatibilist intuitions. We argue that identifying groups of people
who have specific and diverse intuitions about freedom and moral
responsibility offers the possibility for theoretical advancement in
philosophy and psychology, and may in part explain why some perennial
philosophical debates have proven intractable.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the&lt;a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&amp;amp;_udi=B6WD0-4TGGCRP-1&amp;amp;_user=5745&amp;amp;_coverDate=03%2F31%2F2009&amp;amp;_alid=926689756&amp;amp;_rdoc=1&amp;amp;_fmt=high&amp;amp;_orig=mlkt&amp;amp;_cdi=6752&amp;amp;_sort=v&amp;amp;_st=17&amp;amp;_docanchor=&amp;amp;view=c&amp;amp;_ct=464&amp;amp;_acct=C000001358&amp;amp;_version=1&amp;amp;_urlVersion=0&amp;amp;_userid=5745&amp;amp;md5=4594244e79f7d932aa577d9670b8ecfa"&gt; article. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read &lt;a href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/06/01/temperament-and-intuition-a-commentary-on-feltz-and-cokely.aspx"&gt;a critique of this paper&lt;/a&gt; by Defining Wisdom grantee Eddy Nahmias. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Photo from &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/labanex/1327271704/"&gt;Flickr Creative Commons. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=478" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="PHILOSOPHY" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/PHILOSOPHY/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Dirty work, clean hands: The moral psychology of indirect agency</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/06/01/dirty-work-clean-hands-the-moral-psychology-of-indirect-agency.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/06/01/dirty-work-clean-hands-the-moral-psychology-of-indirect-agency.aspx</id><published>2009-06-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-06-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Neeru Paharia, Karim S. Kassam, Joshua D. Greene and Max H. Bazerman&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When powerful people cause harm, they often do so indirectly through
other people. Are harmful actions carried out through others evaluated
less negatively than harmful actions carried out directly? Four
experiments examine the moral psychology of indirect agency.
Experiments 1A, 1B, and 1C reveal effects of indirect agency under
conditions favoring intuitive judgment, but not reflective judgment,
using a joint/separate evaluation paradigm. Experiment 2A demonstrates
that effects of indirect agency cannot be fully explained by perceived
lack of foreknowledge or control on the part of the primary agent.
Experiment 2B indicates that reflective moral judgment is sensitive to
indirect agency, but only to the extent that indirectness signals
reduced foreknowledge and/or control. Experiment 3 indicates that
effects of indirect agency result from a failure to automatically
consider the potentially dubious motives of agents who cause harm
indirectly. Experiment 4 demonstrates an effect of indirect agency on
purchase intentions. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read &lt;a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&amp;amp;_udi=B6WP2-4W3P05B-1&amp;amp;_user=5745&amp;amp;_rdoc=1&amp;amp;_fmt=&amp;amp;_orig=search&amp;amp;_sort=d&amp;amp;view=c&amp;amp;_acct=C000001358&amp;amp;_version=1&amp;amp;_urlVersion=0&amp;amp;_userid=5745&amp;amp;md5=1f8cec702b403c18d1dc00bf3311c85c"&gt;the article. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Image from &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/smercury98/2446660754/" target="_blank"&gt;Flickr Creative Commons&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=479" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>The Wisdom Development Scale: Further Validity Investigations</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/06/01/the-wisdom-development-scale-further-validity-investigations.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/06/01/the-wisdom-development-scale-further-validity-investigations.aspx</id><published>2009-06-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-06-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Jeffrey A. Greene and Scott C. Brown &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Researchers are gaining an interest in the concept of wisdom, a more holistic yet often ineffable educational outcome. Models of wisdom abound, but few have rigorously tested measures. This study looks at Brown’s (2004a, 2004b) Model of Wisdom Development and its associated measure, the Wisdom Development Scale (WDS; Brown &amp;amp; Greene, 2006). The construct validity, measurement invariance, criterion validity, and reliability of scores from the WDS were assessed with over 3000 participants from two separate groups: one a sample of professionals and the other a sample of college students. Support for construct validity and reliability with these samples was found, along with measurement invariance. Latent means analyses showed predicted discrimination between the groups, and criterion validity evidence, with another measure of collegiate educational outcomes, was found.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;amp;source=web&amp;amp;ct=res&amp;amp;cd=3&amp;amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wisdompage.com%2FWisdomResearchers%2FWDSValidity.pdf&amp;amp;ei=dL9MSqrVBIXiMNjohfUD&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFIKyILjpWHrAHmNe0N9t_WGPe4-g&amp;amp;sig2=CCXjVtGGxsiedgWziJ9ylQ"&gt;the article. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=483" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="Wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/Wisdom/default.aspx" /><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="Education" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/Education/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Natural compatibilism versus natural incompatibilism: Back to the drawing board</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/06/29/natural-compatibilism-versus-natural-incompatibilism-back-to-the-drawing-board.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/06/29/natural-compatibilism-versus-natural-incompatibilism-back-to-the-drawing-board.aspx</id><published>2009-06-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-06-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Feltz, A., Cokely, E.T., Nadelhoffer, T.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the free will literature, some compatibilists and some
incompatibilists claim that their views best capture ordinary
intuitions concerning free will and moral responsibility. One goal of
researchers working in the field of experimental philosophy has been to
probe ordinary intuitions in a controlled and systematic way to help
resolve these kinds of intuitional stalemates. We contribute to this
debate by presenting new data about folk intuitions concerning freedom
and responsibility that correct for some of the shortcomings of
previous studies. These studies also illustrate some problems that
pertain to all of the studies that have been run thus far.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Download the&lt;a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;amp;source=web&amp;amp;ct=res&amp;amp;cd=1&amp;amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffaculty.schreiner.edu%2Fadfeltz%2FPapers%2FNC%2520v%2520NI.pdf&amp;amp;ei=lOtISrDbMpKyNujpmJ8B&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNE6UV-r5Sr76RpKRt7i5q1KbJKg8A&amp;amp;sig2=vQOvYeVrqlIV-mBJZbVKww"&gt; pdf. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=489" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="PHILOSOPHY" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/PHILOSOPHY/default.aspx" /><category term="free will" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/free+will/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>An Interfaith Wisdom: Scriptural Reasoning between Jews, Christians, and Muslims</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/06/30/an-interfaith-wisdom-scriptural-reasoning-between-jews-christians-and-muslims.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/06/30/an-interfaith-wisdom-scriptural-reasoning-between-jews-christians-and-muslims.aspx</id><published>2009-06-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-06-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="name"&gt;&lt;span class="forenames"&gt;David F. Ford&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The origins of scriptural reasoning, in which Jews, Christians and
Muslims study their scriptures in conversation with each other, are
described. Some maxims implicit in its form of Abrahamic collegiality
are distilled (including the emphasis on friendship rather than
consensus) and its institutional setting is analysed under the headings
of House (synagogue, church, mosque), campus (university) and tent
(settings where scriptural reasoning is practised). The attempt to cope
with the superabundance of meaning in the scriptures is explored in
terms of doing justice to the plain sense and other senses, using
various theoretical conceptualities, and seeking wisdom together,
concluding with remarks on scriptural reasoning in the public sphere. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Read &lt;a href="http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/118602388/abstract"&gt;the article.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=498" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="practical wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/practical+wisdom/default.aspx" /><category term="theology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/theology/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Wisdom: Exploring the Pinnacle of Human Virtues as a Central Link from Micromarketing to Macromarketing” </title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/08/06/wisdom-exploring-the-pinnacle-of-human-virtues-as-a-central-link-from-micromarketing-to-macromarketing.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/08/06/wisdom-exploring-the-pinnacle-of-human-virtues-as-a-central-link-from-micromarketing-to-macromarketing.aspx</id><published>2009-06-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-06-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p style="MARGIN:0in 0in 0pt;" class="MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;font face="Times New Roman"&gt;The macromarketing system is largely the function of many micromarketing decisions made each day.&lt;span style="mso-spacerun:yes;"&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;But this connection has not been probed thoroughly in the macromarketing literature, and there is a need for conceptual frameworks that can successfully link the challenges of effective micromarketing with the laudable goals of the macromarketing field, which focuses on the interdependencies between marketing and society.&lt;span style="mso-spacerun:yes;"&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;To this end, we explore wisdom, the zenith of human virtues, through pertinent literature and in-depth interviews with executives nominated for their wise decision making.&lt;span style="mso-spacerun:yes;"&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;We discovered that wisdom in marketing is characterized by the recognition and management of five central paradoxes (e.g., the need for expertise versus the need to admit knowledge limitations; the need to enact authority and accountability versus the need for ego control).&lt;span style="mso-spacerun:yes;"&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;We discuss the implications of these findings for the theory, practice, and teaching of macromarketing, and for basic wisdom theory.&lt;span style="mso-spacerun:yes;"&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="mso-spacerun:yes;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="mso-spacerun:yes;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=556" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>David Mick</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/David-Mick.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>Genetic contributions of the serotonin transporter to social learning of fear and economic decision making</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/11/genetic-contributions-of-the-serotonin-transporter-to-social-learning-of-fear-and-economic-decision-making.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/11/genetic-contributions-of-the-serotonin-transporter-to-social-learning-of-fear-and-economic-decision-making.aspx</id><published>2009-06-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-06-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;b style="font-weight:normal;"&gt;Liviu G. Cri&lt;img src="http://scan.oxfordjournals.org/math/scedil.gif" alt="s" border="0" /&gt;an,&lt;a class="" name="RFN1"&gt;&lt;/a&gt; 
Simona Pan&lt;img src="http://scan.oxfordjournals.org/math/abreve.gif" alt="a" border="0" /&gt;&lt;a class="" name="RFN1"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, Romana Vulturar, 
Renata M. Heilman, 
Raluca Szekely,Bogdan Drug&lt;img src="http://scan.oxfordjournals.org/math/abreve.gif" alt="a" border="0" /&gt;&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;and 
Andrei C. Miu&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Serotonin (5-HT) modulates emotional and cognitive functions&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;such as fear conditioning (FC) and decision making. This study&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;investigated the effects of a functional polymorphism in the&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;regulatory region (5-HTTLPR) of the human 5-HT transporter (5-HTT)&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;gene on observational FC, risk taking and susceptibility to&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;framing in decision making under uncertainty, as well as multidimensional&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;anxiety and autonomic control of the heart in healthy volunteers.&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;The present results indicate that in comparison to the homozygotes&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;for the long (&lt;i&gt;l&lt;/i&gt;) version of 5-HTTLPR, the carriers of the short&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;(&lt;i&gt;s&lt;/i&gt;) version display enhanced observational FC, reduced financial&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;risk taking and increased susceptibility to framing in economic&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;decision making. We also found that &lt;i&gt;s&lt;/i&gt;-carriers have increased&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;trait anxiety due to threat in social evaluation, and ambiguous&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;threat perception. In addition, &lt;i&gt;s&lt;/i&gt;-carriers also show reduced&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;autonomic control over the heart, and a pattern of reduced vagal&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;tone and increased sympathetic activity in comparison to &lt;i&gt;l&lt;/i&gt;-homozygotes.&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;This is the first genetic study that identifies the association&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;of a functional polymorphism in a key neurotransmitter-related&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;gene with complex social–emotional and cognitive processes.&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;The present set of results suggests an endophenotype of anxiety&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;disorders, characterized by enhanced social learning of fear,&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;impaired decision making and dysfunctional autonomic activity. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://scan.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/4/4/399"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=728" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="cognition" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/cognition/default.aspx" /><category term="virtue" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/virtue/default.aspx" /><category term="neuroscience" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/neuroscience/default.aspx" /><category term="biology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/biology/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Serotonin shapes risky decision making in monkeys</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/11/serotonin-shapes-risky-decision-making-in-monkeys.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/11/serotonin-shapes-risky-decision-making-in-monkeys.aspx</id><published>2009-06-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-06-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Arwen B. Long, 
Cynthia M. Kuhn and 
Michael L. Platt&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Some people love taking risks, while others avoid gambles at&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;all costs. The neural mechanisms underlying individual variation&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;in preference for risky or certain outcomes, however, remain&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;poorly understood. Although behavioral pathologies associated&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;with compulsive gambling, addiction and other psychiatric disorders&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;implicate deficient serotonin signaling in pathological decision&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;making, there is little experimental evidence demonstrating&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;a link between serotonin and risky decision making, in part&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;due to the lack of a good animal model. We used dietary rapid&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;tryptophan depletion (RTD) to acutely lower brain serotonin&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;in three macaques performing a simple gambling task for fluid&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;rewards. To confirm the efficacy of RTD experiments, we measured&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;total plasma tryptophan using high-performance liquid chromatography&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;(HPLC) with electrochemical detection. Reducing brain serotonin&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;synthesis decreased preference for the safe option in a gambling&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;task. Moreover, lowering brain serotonin function significantly&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;decreased the premium required for monkeys to switch their preference&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;to the risky option, suggesting that diminished serotonin signaling&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;enhances the relative subjective value of the risky option.&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;These results implicate serotonin in risk-sensitive decision&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;making and, further, suggest pharmacological therapies for treating&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;pathological risk preferences in disorders such as problem gambling&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;and addiction. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://scan.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/4/4/346"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=726" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>nick stock</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/nick-stock.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /><category term="behavior" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/behavior/default.aspx" /><category term="neuroscience" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/neuroscience/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>The Experience of Depth Curiosity: The Pursuit of Congruence Despite the Danger of Engulfment</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/06/01/the-experience-of-depth-curiosity-the-pursuit-of-congruence-despite-the-danger-of-engulfment.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/06/01/the-experience-of-depth-curiosity-the-pursuit-of-congruence-despite-the-danger-of-engulfment.aspx</id><published>2009-06-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-06-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;A recent publication by one of our grantees and colleagues, Heidi Levitt. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This article presents a grounded theory analysis of the experience of
sustaining an abiding curiosity. Results emphasize how curiosity became
inherently motivating and pleasurable, and led to deeper understandings
of interpersonal differences and an enriched sense of identity. Despite
the experience of curiosity strengthening, waning, and shifting across
time, it was experienced as a longstanding driving force. At the same
time, if consuming, curiosity holds risks for participants and could
lead to alienation from others and despair. The discussion puts forward
a more integrated understanding of a somewhat fragmented literature and
highlights the complexities that depth curiosity entails.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Levitt, Heidi M.&lt;br /&gt;Williams, Daniel C.&lt;br /&gt;Uruk, Ayse Ciftci&lt;br /&gt;Kannan, Divya&lt;br /&gt;Obana, Maki&lt;br /&gt;Smith, Brandy L.&lt;br /&gt;Wang, Mei-Chuan&lt;br /&gt;Plexico, Laura W.&lt;br /&gt;Camp, Jonathan&lt;br /&gt;Hardison, Heather&lt;br /&gt;Watts, Anasa&lt;br /&gt;Biss, Wendy J.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Link to &lt;a href="http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content%7Econtent=a911582410%7Edb=all%7Ejumptype=rss"&gt;the article &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=462" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Temperament and intuition: A commentary on Feltz and Cokely</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/06/01/temperament-and-intuition-a-commentary-on-feltz-and-cokely.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/06/01/temperament-and-intuition-a-commentary-on-feltz-and-cokely.aspx</id><published>2009-06-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-06-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Co-authored by one of our grantees, Eddy Nahmias. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;In this paper, we examine Adam Feltz and Edward Cokely’s recent claim
that “the personality trait extraversion predicts people’s intuitions
about the relationship of determinism to free will and moral
responsibility.” We will first present some
criticisms of their work before briefly examining the results of a
recent study of our own. We argue that while Feltz and Cokely have
their finger on the pulse of an interesting and important issue, they
have not established a robust and stable connection between
extraversion and compatibilist-friendly intuitions...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Nadelhoffer, Thomas&lt;br /&gt;Kvaran, Trevor&lt;br /&gt;Nahmias, Eddy &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&amp;amp;_udi=B6WD0-4VBM4CV-1&amp;amp;_user=5745&amp;amp;_rdoc=1&amp;amp;_fmt=&amp;amp;_orig=search&amp;amp;_sort=d&amp;amp;view=c&amp;amp;_acct=C000001358&amp;amp;_version=1&amp;amp;_urlVersion=0&amp;amp;_userid=5745&amp;amp;md5=4b43244725f8aba672c78d68c6b8f665"&gt;full article. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&amp;amp;_udi=B6WD0-4TGGCRP-1&amp;amp;_user=5745&amp;amp;_origUdi=B6WD0-4VBM4CV-1&amp;amp;_fmt=high&amp;amp;_coverDate=03%2F31%2F2009&amp;amp;_rdoc=1&amp;amp;_orig=article&amp;amp;_acct=C000001358&amp;amp;_version=1&amp;amp;_urlVersion=0&amp;amp;_userid=5745&amp;amp;md5=b08337579e1430e404d7022f6ab25a0b"&gt;original commentary by Feltz and Cokley&lt;/a&gt;: &amp;quot;Do judgments about freedom and responsibility depend on who you are?
Personality differences in intuitions about compatibilism and
incompatibilism&lt;a title="bafn1" class="" name="bafn1"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;quot; &lt;i&gt;Consciousness and Cognition,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/i&gt;



Volume 18, Issue 1, 


March 2009, p 342-35.



 &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Image from &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/notsogoodphotography/3478303809/" target="_blank"&gt;Flickr Creative Commons&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=463" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="PHILOSOPHY" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/PHILOSOPHY/default.aspx" /><category term="free will" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/free+will/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Counterclockwise: Mindful Health and the Power of Possibility</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/05/01/counterclockwise-mindful-health-and-the-power-of-possibility.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/05/01/counterclockwise-mindful-health-and-the-power-of-possibility.aspx</id><published>2009-05-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-05-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Ellen J. Langer&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;If we could turn back the clock psychologically, could we also turn it
back physically? For more than thirty years, award-winning social
psychologist Ellen Langer has studied this provocative question, and
now, in Counterclockwise, she presents the answer: Opening our minds to
what’s possible, instead of presuming impossibility, can lead to better
health–at any age. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Drawing on landmark work in the field and
her own body of colorful and highly original experiments–including the
first detailed discussion of her “counterclockwise” study, in which
elderly men lived for a week as though it was 1959 and showed dramatic
improvements in their hearing, memory, dexterity, appetite, and general
well-being–Langer shows that the magic of rejuvenation and ongoing good
health lies in being aware of the ways we mindlessly react to social
and cultural cues. Examining the hidden decisions and vocabulary that
shape the medical world (“chronic” versus “acute,” “cure” versus
“remission”), the powerful physical effects of placebos, and the
intricate but often defeatist ways we define our physical health,
Langer challenges the idea that the limits we assume and impose on
ourselves are real. With only subtle shifts in our thinking, in our
language, and in our expectations, she tells us, we can begin to change
the ingrained behaviors that sap health, optimism, and vitality from
our lives. Improved vision, younger appearance, weight loss, and
increased longevity are just four of the results that Langer has
demonstrated....&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read more from &lt;a href="http://www.randomhouse.com/catalog/display.pperl/9780345502049.html"&gt;the publisher &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=449" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>What is Human Wisdom?: An Interrogation of Posthuman Futures in Transhuman Evolutionary Discourse</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/05/01/what-is-human-wisdom-an-interrogation-of-posthuman-futures-in-transhuman-evolutionary-discourse.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/05/01/what-is-human-wisdom-an-interrogation-of-posthuman-futures-in-transhuman-evolutionary-discourse.aspx</id><published>2009-05-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-05-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;b&gt;Excerpt: &lt;/b&gt;&amp;quot;&lt;span id="dnn_ctr418_Articles_ArticleForm_MessageHTMLLabel"&gt;Transhumanism
is the view that humans should be permitted to use technology in order
to re-make human nature, offered as the next stage in human evolution.
It differs from posthumanism in as much as posthumanity is largely
concerned with an ideal future where such transitions have already
happened. Christian engagement with transhuman discourse has more often
than not been situated in the context of ethical debates about the
legitimacy of particular technologies championed by transhumanists in
their goals to achieve a form of humanity that is not just freed from
those mortal ills that weigh down ordinary human lives, but also aims
towards additional ‘supra-human’ qualities deemed desirable to attain.
Many see transhumanity as an intermediate stage on the way to a
full-blown posthumanity, and as such, it draws on the scientific
technologies currently available in order to justify its position. ...&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span id="dnn_ctr418_Articles_ArticleForm_MessageHTMLLabel"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span id="dnn_ctr418_Articles_ArticleForm_MessageHTMLLabel"&gt;&amp;quot;Nick Bostom
and Anders Sandberg also believe that the starting point for
interventions is one that reflects the ‘wisdom of nature’ by posing
what they term is the &lt;i&gt;evolutionary optimality challenge&lt;/i&gt;, namely, if the proposed intervention would lead to an enhancement, why have humans &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; evolved in this way?
Bostrom and Sandberg believe that it is permissible to go beyond the
fundamental limitations of evolution, caused either by physical
incapability, such as diamond teeth, or by being ‘locked in’ through
genetic processes such as heterozygote alleles giving an advantage to a
homozygote lethal condition. In such cases, the human engineer has a
specific aim in view, hence, working backwards in order to propose
possible enhancements. This process of human engineering takes account
of the evolutionary knowledge already gained, but is also able to
override ignorance in that they believe that there may be some
justification in making interventions where the evolutionary function
is unknown. In the final analysis it seems that the goal towards
transhuman evolution is simply made more palatable by the rhetorical
use of the evolutionary and wisdom heuristic.&amp;quot;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Source: &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.metanexus.net/magazine/tabid/68/id/10448/Default.aspx" target="_blank"&gt;The Global Spiral&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Image by &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/vitroids/3241810440/" target="_blank"&gt;Masakazu Matsumoto&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=456" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>mcavanaugh</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/mcavanaugh.aspx</uri></author><category term="evolution" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/evolution/default.aspx" /><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="religion" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/religion/default.aspx" /><category term="cognition" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/cognition/default.aspx" /><category term="virtue" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/virtue/default.aspx" /><category term="theology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/theology/default.aspx" /><category term="PHILOSOPHY" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/PHILOSOPHY/default.aspx" /><category term="ethics" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/ethics/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Relations of homology between higher cognitive emotions and basic emotions</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/06/01/relations-of-homology-between-higher-cognitive-emotions-and-basic-emotions.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/06/01/relations-of-homology-between-higher-cognitive-emotions-and-basic-emotions.aspx</id><published>2009-05-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-05-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jason&amp;nbsp;A.&amp;nbsp;Clark &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="AbstractHeading"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;In the last 10&amp;nbsp;years,
several authors including Griffiths and Matthen have employed
classificatory principles from biology to argue for a radical revision
in the way that we individuate psychological traits. Arguing that the
fundamental basis for classification of traits in biology is that of
‘homology’ (similarity due to common descent) rather than ‘analogy’, or
‘shared function’, and that psychological traits are a special case of
biological traits, they maintain that psychological categories should
be individuated primarily by relations of homology rather than in terms
of shared function. This poses a direct challenge to the dominant
philosophical view of how to define psychological categories, viz.,
‘functionalism’. Although the implications of this position extend to
all psychological traits, the debate has centered around ‘emotion’ as
an example of a psychological category ripe for reinterpretation within
this new framework of classification. I address arguments by Griffiths
that emotions should be divided into at least two distinct classes,
basic emotions and higher cognitive emotions, and that these two
classes require radically different theories to explain them. Griffiths
argues that while basic emotions in humans are homologous to the
corresponding states in other animals, higher cognitive emotions are
dependent on mental capacities unique to humans, and are therefore not
homologous to basic emotions. Using the example of shame, I argue that
(a) many emotions that are commonly classified as being higher
cognitive emotions actually correspond to certain basic emotions, and
that (b) the “higher cognitive forms” of these emotions are best seen
as being homologous to their basic forms.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;span class="AbstractHeading"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=466" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="cognition" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/cognition/default.aspx" /><category term="PHILOSOPHY" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/PHILOSOPHY/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Colony-level cognition</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/05/01/colony-level-cognition.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/05/01/colony-level-cognition.aspx</id><published>2009-05-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-05-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;James A.R. Marshall and Nigel R. Franks&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;&amp;quot;What is cognition?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; We favour the following
definition of cognition: “cognition [is] the ability to use internal
representations of information acquired in separate events, and to
combine these to generate novel information and apply it in an adaptive
manner” (Chittka and Osorio, 2007).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;What is ‘colony-level cognition’?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;
For some time now it has been recognised that colonies of certain
social organisms, for example social insects such as ants or honeybees,
can legitimately be regarded as functionally integrated
‘superorganisms’. In a social insect colony, colony-level cognition can
be understood as cognition where internal representations are within
the individual insects and their interactions with one another, just as
in a brain the internal representations of cognition are in action
potentials of neurons and their patterns of interaction...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com.proxy.uchicago.edu/science?_ob=ArticleURL&amp;amp;_udi=B6VRT-4WCM8FG-7&amp;amp;_user=5745&amp;amp;_coverDate=05%2F26%2F2009&amp;amp;_rdoc=7&amp;amp;_fmt=high&amp;amp;_orig=browse&amp;amp;_srch=doc-info%28%23toc%236243%232009%23999809989%231130145%23FLA%23display%23Volume%29&amp;amp;_cdi=6243&amp;amp;_sort=d&amp;amp;_docanchor=&amp;amp;_ct=32&amp;amp;_acct=C000001358&amp;amp;_version=1&amp;amp;_urlVersion=0&amp;amp;_userid=5745&amp;amp;md5=dd4087dc3df686e0b5d0dcce1f1041a3"&gt;full article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=467" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="evolution" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/evolution/default.aspx" /><category term="cognition" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/cognition/default.aspx" /><category term="biology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/biology/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Functional Neuroanatomy: The Locus of Human Intelligence</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/06/01/functional-neuroanatomy-the-locus-of-human-intelligence.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/06/01/functional-neuroanatomy-the-locus-of-human-intelligence.aspx</id><published>2009-05-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-05-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Parashkev Nachev, Yee-Haur Mah and Masud Husain&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A new study mapping the functional effects of brain lesions has
revealed&amp;nbsp;a surprising map of human intelligence, stimulating a
re-evaluation of data from purely correlative methods such as
functional magnetic resonance imaging.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Read &lt;a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com.proxy.uchicago.edu/science?_ob=ArticleURL&amp;amp;_udi=B6VRT-4WCM8FG-K&amp;amp;_user=5745&amp;amp;_coverDate=05%2F26%2F2009&amp;amp;_rdoc=17&amp;amp;_fmt=high&amp;amp;_orig=browse&amp;amp;_srch=doc-info%28%23toc%236243%232009%23999809989%231130145%23FLA%23display%23Volume%29&amp;amp;_cdi=6243&amp;amp;_sort=d&amp;amp;_docanchor=&amp;amp;_ct=32&amp;amp;_acct=C000001358&amp;amp;_version=1&amp;amp;_urlVersion=0&amp;amp;_userid=5745&amp;amp;md5=66e2614421755cdf596b82e8103997e0"&gt;the article. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=468" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="biology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/biology/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Social Learning: What Do Drosophila Have to Offer?</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/05/01/social-learning-what-do-drosophila-have-to-offer.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/05/01/social-learning-what-do-drosophila-have-to-offer.aspx</id><published>2009-05-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-05-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ellouise Leadbeater &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The recent finding that female &lt;i&gt;Drosophila&lt;/i&gt; copy the mate-choice
criteria of other females introduces a mainstream model species to the
study of how animals use social information.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read &lt;a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com.proxy.uchicago.edu/science?_ob=ArticleURL&amp;amp;_udi=B6VRT-4W8DBK9-N&amp;amp;_user=5745&amp;amp;_coverDate=05%2F12%2F2009&amp;amp;_rdoc=19&amp;amp;_fmt=high&amp;amp;_orig=browse&amp;amp;_srch=doc-info%28%23toc%236243%232009%23999809990%231097050%23FLA%23display%23Volume%29&amp;amp;_cdi=6243&amp;amp;_sort=d&amp;amp;_docanchor=&amp;amp;_ct=36&amp;amp;_acct=C000001358&amp;amp;_version=1&amp;amp;_urlVersion=0&amp;amp;_userid=5745&amp;amp;md5=7a452c109fafd55e3a2a73f5b804a218"&gt;the article. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=469" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="biology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/biology/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Can evolution explain how minds work?</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/06/01/can-evolution-explain-how-minds-work.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/06/01/can-evolution-explain-how-minds-work.aspx</id><published>2009-05-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-05-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Johan J. Bolhuis &amp;amp;
			Clive D. L. Wynne &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Biologists have tended to assume that closely related species will have
similar cognitive abilities. Johan J. Bolhuis and Clive D. L. Wynne put
this evolutionarily inspired idea through its paces.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Darwin&amp;#39;s theory of evolution by natural selection is broadly accepted
among biologists, but its implications for the study of cognition are
far from clear. Few within the scientific pale would argue against the
proposition that life on Earth has evolved and that this general
principle can be extended to the process of thought. But in taking an
evolutionary approach, biologists have tended to assume that species
with shared ancestry will have similar cognitive abilities, and that
the evolutionary history of traits can be used to reveal how we and
other animals perform certain mental tasks. A closer analysis suggests
things aren&amp;#39;t so simple...&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read&lt;a href="http://www.nature.com.proxy.uchicago.edu/nature/journal/v458/n7240/full/458832a.html"&gt; the essay. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=470" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="evolution" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/evolution/default.aspx" /><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="cognition" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/cognition/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Is free will an illusion?</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/06/01/is-free-will-an-illusion.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/06/01/is-free-will-an-illusion.aspx</id><published>2009-05-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-05-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Martin Heisenberg&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Scientists and philosophers are using new discoveries in neuroscience
to question the idea of free will. They are misguided, says Martin
Heisenberg. Examining animal behaviour shows how our actions can be
free...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read&lt;a href="http://www.nature.com.proxy.uchicago.edu/nature/journal/v459/n7244/full/459164a.html"&gt; the essay. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=471" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="neuroscience" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/neuroscience/default.aspx" /><category term="PHILOSOPHY" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/PHILOSOPHY/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Is Our Brain Too Big to Think Effectively?</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/04/01/is-our-brain-too-big-to-think-effectively.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/04/01/is-our-brain-too-big-to-think-effectively.aspx</id><published>2009-04-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-04-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p class="articleBody_author"&gt;Konrad&amp;nbsp;R.&amp;nbsp;Fialkowski &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p class="articleBody_normalText firstInBody"&gt;&amp;quot;In their paper, “Archaic Human Admixture,” Garrigan and Kingan (&lt;a href="http://www.journals.uchicago.edu.proxy.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086/592022#rf7" class="ref-type-bibr" id="rid_rf7"&gt;2007&lt;/a&gt;) wrote,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="quote"&gt; &lt;p class="first last"&gt;In contrast to Xp21 and &lt;i&gt;RRM2P4&lt;/i&gt; examples, in which the putatively introgressed archaic lineages were found at relatively low frequencies, the &lt;i&gt;MCPH1&lt;/i&gt;
D lineage occurs in nearly 70% of the sampled chromosomes. Lastly, the
D lineage is estimated to have introgressed into the anatomically
modern human genome approximately 37,000 years ago. … Could this be the
first example of adaptive hybridization in hominids?&lt;/p&gt; &lt;/div&gt; However, the question arises of &lt;i&gt;what&lt;/i&gt;
was adaptive about this hybridization that shifted our genome back to
the allele of our evolutionary forefathers. The rapidity of
proliferation (70% in 37,000 years) implies that this particular allele
had led to an extremely high fitness in individuals.&lt;p class="articleBody_normalText"&gt;At
the time of introgression, images had already been painted on the walls
of caves and burial ceremonies performed. Speech had been in use for
more than 100,000 years (Liberman &lt;a href="http://www.journals.uchicago.edu.proxy.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086/592022#rf8" class="ref-type-bibr" id="rid_rf8"&gt;1991&lt;/a&gt;),
to the accompaniment of abstract thinking. Generally, similar to today,
reasoning and thinking were the primary faculties of individuals...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="articleBody_normalText"&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www.journals.uchicago.edu.proxy.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086/592022"&gt;full paper. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=465" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="evolution" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/evolution/default.aspx" /><category term="intelligence" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/intelligence/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Intention, Belief, and Wishful Thinking: Setiya on “Practical Knowledge”</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/06/30/intention-belief-and-wishful-thinking-setiya-on-practical-knowledge.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/06/30/intention-belief-and-wishful-thinking-setiya-on-practical-knowledge.aspx</id><published>2009-04-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-04-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p class="articleBody_author"&gt;Sarah&amp;nbsp;K.&amp;nbsp;Paul&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;div class="frontNote noteType_footnote"&gt;  &lt;/div&gt;&lt;p class="articleBody_normalText firstInBody"&gt;In
“Practical Knowledge,” Kieran Setiya argues for the thesis that
“forming an intention is forming a belief about what one is doing, or
what one is going to do.”
He then takes up what appears to be a curious consequence of this
thesis: that intending turns out to be a matter of wishful thinking.
After all, beliefs are the sort of attitude ordinarily held responsible
to evidence for their truth. Intentions, on the other hand, are formed
precisely when there is not sufficient evidence that one will perform
the proposed action; if one did have sufficient evidence, the intention
would be redundant. Rather, they are ordinarily formed out of a
preference for performing that action and because one does not believe
one will perform it absent the intention. The resulting view is that
intending constitutively involves forming a belief out of a preference
for its coming true and without sufficient prior evidence to support
it. In other words, it requires what seems like wishful thinking.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="articleBody_normalText firstInBody"&gt;Read &lt;a href="http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086/599312"&gt;the article. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=497" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="PHILOSOPHY" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/PHILOSOPHY/default.aspx" /><category term="ethics" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/ethics/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Intention, Practical Rationality, and Self‐Governance</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/07/29/intention-practical-rationality-and-self-governance.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/07/29/intention-practical-rationality-and-self-governance.aspx</id><published>2009-04-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-04-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">

&lt;div class="frontNote noteType_footnote"&gt;  &lt;/div&gt;&lt;p class="articleBody_normalText firstInBody"&gt;The
planning theory of intention and of our agency highlights the
fundamental coordinating and organizing roles of structures of planning
in the temporally extended and social practical thought and action of
agents like us.
Intentions are elements of plans of action, plans that are normally
hierarchically structured, partial, and at least in part future
directed. And these planning structures help to support and to
constitute forms of agency that we value highly.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Planning
agency involves characteristic norms of practical rationality. However,
when we try to understand these norms, and their relation to practical
reasons, we are led to a hard problem. In this essay I try to say what
this problem is and to solve it in a way that is responsive to the
recent literature. Some (I call them ‘cognitivists&amp;#39;) see these
rationality norms as, at bottom, norms of theoretical rationality. Some
instead see the idea that these rationality norms have a distinctive
normative force as a “myth.” I seek a path between, one that highlights
connections between practical reason, planning structures, and the
metaphysics of self‐governance: for planning agents like us, our reason
for conforming to these norms of practical rationality derives in part
from our reason to govern our own lives.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;by Michael&amp;nbsp;E.&amp;nbsp;Bratman&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read &lt;a href="http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086/599985"&gt;the article. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=547" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="ethics" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/ethics/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>What role does commitment play among writers with different levels of creativity?</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/04/01/what-role-does-commitment-play-among-writers-with-different-levels-of-creativity.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/04/01/what-role-does-commitment-play-among-writers-with-different-levels-of-creativity.aspx</id><published>2009-04-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-04-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;By Seana Moran, a wisdom grantee.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;quot;Commitment involves how a person invests resources in a work role over long periods of time. Creativity is a novel, appropriate variation that is embraced by a field of gatekeepers and transforms the symbolic domain. This qualitative analysis (Cohen&amp;#39;s kappas of .62, .86, .68 across three coders) addresses the different roles that commitment plays in the careers of 36 writers, depending on what level of creative influence the literary field has attributed to the writer&amp;#39;s work. The sample was segmented into genre conformers who played by established literary rules (M = 0.15, SD = 0.18), experimentalists whose innovations have not yet caught on widely (M = 0.80, SD = 0.17), and domain transformers who changed the canon (M = 1.32, SD = 0.27). For genre conformers, commitment compensates. They invest technique in the craft of writing to improve their social standing among other writers, editors, and critics within the field. For experimentalists, commitment defies. They translate their selves into words by twisting traditions and supports to yield new meanings, which gains them an emotional rush plus increased control over their self-expression. For domain transformers, commitment impassions. They trust some beloved aspect of literature, such as a character or poetic form, to convert new minds to the latent possibilities of the domain.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Read the &lt;a href="http://www.informaworld.com.proxy.uchicago.edu/smpp/content%7Edb=all%7Econtent=a910918367"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Image from &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/foolstopzanet/151936713/"&gt;Flickr Creative Commons&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=561" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>ajstasic</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/ajstasic.aspx</uri></author><category term="wisdom-related knowledge" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/wisdom-related+knowledge/default.aspx" /><category term="knowledge" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/knowledge/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Social Imperatives for Better education: Putting Wisdom on the Agenda</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/04/01/social-imperatives-for-better-education-putting-wisdom-on-the-agenda.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/04/01/social-imperatives-for-better-education-putting-wisdom-on-the-agenda.aspx</id><published>2009-04-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-04-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;By Sharon Rich, John McLaughlin&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Educators must adapt &lt;span class="hit"&gt;the&lt;/span&gt; institutions in which they work to ensure students&amp;#39; &lt;span class="hit"&gt;wisdom&lt;/span&gt; is developed. They should recognize and articulate &lt;span class="hit"&gt;the&lt;/span&gt; current &lt;span class="hit"&gt;educational&lt;/span&gt; context, broaden their perspective of &lt;span class="hit"&gt;education&lt;/span&gt;, be prepared to provide financial support to both individuals and organizations, and recognize that &lt;span class="hit"&gt;the&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="hit"&gt;social&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="hit"&gt;imperative&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="hit"&gt;for&lt;/span&gt; change must become &lt;span class="hit"&gt;the&lt;/span&gt; driving force behind public &lt;span class="hit"&gt;education&lt;/span&gt;. They should also acknowledge significant &lt;span class="hit"&gt;educational&lt;/span&gt; settings other than school, and seek to nurture &lt;span class="hit"&gt;the&lt;/span&gt; spirit as well as &lt;span class="hit"&gt;the&lt;/span&gt; mind.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Read &lt;a class="" href="http://vnweb.hwwilsonweb.com.proxy.uchicago.edu/hww/results/getResults.jhtml?_DARGS=/hww/results/results_common.jhtml.33"&gt;the article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=675" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>Cait</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/Cait.aspx</uri></author><category term="Education" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/Education/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Hagia Sophia (Divine Wisdom)</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/04/01/hagia-sophia-divine-wisdom.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/04/01/hagia-sophia-divine-wisdom.aspx</id><published>2009-04-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-04-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Perspective on wisdom, holism, and epistemics, a term used to describe the&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;systematic study of subjective knowledge. This article is a commentary on the &lt;a href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/04/01/the-neurobiology-of-wisdom-a-literature-overview.aspx"&gt;Neurobiology of Wisdom article &lt;/a&gt;in the same issue and journal. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;by James C. Harris, M.D.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;There is in all visible things an invisible fecundity, a dimmed&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;light, a meek namelessness, and a hidden wholeness. This mysterious&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;Unity and Integrity is Wisdom, the Mother of all,&lt;/i&gt; Natura naturans.—Thomas&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;Merton, &amp;quot;Hagia Sophia,&amp;quot; 1963&lt;sup&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;sup&gt;(p65)&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;

The world&amp;#39;s religions emphasize the importance of adhering to&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;a prescribed spiritual path that facilitates emotional maturity&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;and offers the hope of transcendent wisdom. Such wisdom is accompanied&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;by a heightened consciousness, a sense of inner silence, joy,&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;gratitude, and a spontaneous morality. To develop wisdom, both&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;Western and Eastern religions teach constraint, a disciplined&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;morality, charitable concern, and compassionate action...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://ccsn.uchicago.edu/Hagia_Sophia.pdf"&gt;Download the full pdf. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=459" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="Wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/Wisdom/default.aspx" /><category term="religion" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/religion/default.aspx" /><category term="PHILOSOPHY" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/PHILOSOPHY/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>The Neurobiology of Wisdom: A Literature Overview</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/04/01/the-neurobiology-of-wisdom-a-literature-overview.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/04/01/the-neurobiology-of-wisdom-a-literature-overview.aspx</id><published>2009-04-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-04-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;
Thomas W. Meeks, MD; 
Dilip V. Jeste, MD
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;

&lt;b&gt;Context&amp;nbsp;&lt;/b&gt; Wisdom is a unique psychological trait noted since&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;antiquity, long discussed in humanities disciplines, recently&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;operationalized by psychology and sociology researchers, but&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;largely unexamined in psychiatry or biology.&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;

&lt;b&gt;Objective&amp;nbsp;&lt;/b&gt; To discuss recent neurobiological studies related&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;to subcomponents of wisdom identified from several published&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;definitions/descriptions of wisdom by clinical investigators&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;in the field, ie, prosocial attitudes/behaviors, social decision&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;making/pragmatic knowledge of life, emotional homeostasis, reflection/self-understanding,&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;value relativism/tolerance, and acknowledgment of and dealing&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;effectively with uncertainty.&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;

&lt;b&gt;Data Sources&amp;nbsp;&lt;/b&gt; Literature focusing primarily on neuroimaging/brain&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;localization and secondarily on neurotransmitters, including&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;their genetic determinants.&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;

&lt;b&gt;Study Selection&amp;nbsp;&lt;/b&gt; Studies involving functional neuroimaging&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;or neurotransmitter functioning, examining human (rather than&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;animal) subjects, and identified via a PubMed search using keywords&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;from any of the 6 proposed subcomponents of wisdom were included.&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;

&lt;b&gt;Data Extraction&amp;nbsp;&lt;/b&gt; Studies were reviewed by both of us, and&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;data considered to be potentially relevant to the neurobiology&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;of wisdom were extracted.&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;

&lt;b&gt;Data Synthesis&amp;nbsp;&lt;/b&gt; Functional neuroimaging permits exploration&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;of neural correlates of complex psychological attributes such&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;as those proposed to comprise wisdom. The prefrontal cortex&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;figures prominently in several wisdom subcomponents (eg, emotional&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;regulation, decision making, value relativism), primarily via&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;top-down regulation of limbic and striatal regions. The lateral&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;prefrontal cortex facilitates calculated, reason-based decision&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;making, whereas the medial prefrontal cortex is implicated in&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;emotional valence and prosocial attitudes/behaviors. Reward&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;neurocircuitry (ventral striatum, nucleus accumbens) also appears&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;important for promoting prosocial attitudes/behaviors. Monoaminergic&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;activity (especially dopaminergic and serotonergic), influenced&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;by several genetic polymorphisms, is critical to certain subcomponents&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;of wisdom such as emotional regulation (including impulse control),&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;decision making, and prosocial behaviors.&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;

&lt;b&gt;Conclusions&amp;nbsp;&lt;/b&gt; We have proposed a speculative model of the&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;neurobiology of wisdom involving frontostriatal and frontolimbic&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;circuits and monoaminergic pathways. Wisdom may involve optimal&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;balance between functions of phylogenetically more primitive&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;brain regions (limbic system) and newer ones (prefrontal cortex).&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;Limitations of the putative model are stressed. It is hoped&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;that this review will stimulate further research in characterization,&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;assessment, neurobiology, and interventions related to wisdom.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://archpsyc.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/66/4/355"&gt;article &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=405" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>Inferior Parietal Lobule Supports Decision Making under Uncertainty in Humans</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/04/20/inferior-parietal-lobule-supports-decision-making-under-uncertainty-in-humans.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/04/20/inferior-parietal-lobule-supports-decision-making-under-uncertainty-in-humans.aspx</id><published>2009-04-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-04-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; The optimal responses for many decisions faced by humans are ill defined, yet we are able to choose well by associating choices with outcomes, and employing this information in decision making.Previous studies suggest that the parietal cortex is involved in&lt;br /&gt;‘‘uncertain’’ decision making, yet uncertainty is confounded with increased difficulty and attention. Here we aim to dissociate the role of parietal cortex in decision making and attention. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging we measured brain activity while participants played a ‘‘matching-pennies’’ game. We found that the inferior parietal lobule is involved in decision making under uncertainty, showing higher activity when the decision was&lt;br /&gt;uncertain rather than certain and when humans were given trial-by-trial feedback on choice outcomes than when they were not. Crucially, increasing attentional load with secondary tasks reduced inferior parietal activity when decisions were made under uncertainty,&lt;br /&gt;suggesting that general attention does not drive its activation. This pattern was consistent for visual or auditory feedback, and for direct (symbols representing wins and losses) or indirect (only the opponent’s choices were shown) feedback. It contrasted with results from medial superior frontal gyrus, which was driven primarily by increased attentional load. We suggest that decision making under uncertainty is dissociable from general attention in the brain.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Source: &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href="http://cercor.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/19/4/916" target="_blank"&gt;Cerebral Cortex&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=436" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>admin</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/admin.aspx</uri></author><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /><category term="neuroscience" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/neuroscience/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Empirical Ethics as Dialogical Practice</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/04/01/empirical-ethics-as-dialogical-practice.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/04/01/empirical-ethics-as-dialogical-practice.aspx</id><published>2009-04-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-04-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://apps.isiknowledge.com/OneClickSearch.do?product=UA&amp;amp;search_mode=OneClickSearch&amp;amp;db_id=&amp;amp;SID=1D3blkPj8oidpoak5B7&amp;amp;field=AU&amp;amp;value=Widdershoven,%20G&amp;amp;ut=000264635900005&amp;amp;pos=1"&gt;Widdershoven, G&lt;/a&gt; (Widdershoven, Guy), &lt;a href="http://apps.isiknowledge.com/OneClickSearch.do?product=UA&amp;amp;search_mode=OneClickSearch&amp;amp;db_id=&amp;amp;SID=1D3blkPj8oidpoak5B7&amp;amp;field=AU&amp;amp;value=Abma,%20T&amp;amp;ut=000264635900005&amp;amp;pos=2"&gt;Abma, T&lt;/a&gt; (Abma, Tineke), &lt;a href="http://apps.isiknowledge.com/OneClickSearch.do?product=UA&amp;amp;search_mode=OneClickSearch&amp;amp;db_id=&amp;amp;SID=1D3blkPj8oidpoak5B7&amp;amp;field=AU&amp;amp;value=Molewijk,%20B&amp;amp;ut=000264635900005&amp;amp;pos=3"&gt;Molewijk, B&lt;/a&gt; (Molewijk, Bert) &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span class="FR_label"&gt;Abstract:&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/b&gt;In this article, we present a
dialogical approach to empirical ethics, based upon hermeneutic ethics
and responsive evaluation. Hermeneutic ethics regards experience as the
concrete source of moral wisdom. In order to gain a good understanding
of moral issues, concrete detailed experiences and perspectives need to
be exchanged. Within hermeneutic ethics dialogue is seen as a vehicle
for moral learning and developing normative conclusions. Dialogue
stands for a specific view on moral epistemology and methodological
criteria for moral inquiry. Responsive evaluation involves a structured
way of setting up dialogical learning processes, by eliciting stories
of participants, exchanging experiences in (homogeneous and
heterogeneous) groups and drawing normative conclusions for practice.
By combining these traditions we develop both a theoretical and a
practical approach to empirical ethics, in which ethical issues are
addressed and shaped together with stakeholders in practice.
Stakeholders&amp;#39; experiences are not only used as a source for reflection
by the ethicist; stakeholders are involved in the process of reflection
and analysis, which takes place in a dialogue between participants in
practice, facilitated by the ethicist. This dialogical approach to
empirical ethics may give rise to questions such as: What contribution
does the ethicist make? What role does ethical theory play? What is the
relationship between empirical research and ethical theory in the
dialogical process? In this article, these questions will be addressed
by reflecting upon a project in empirical ethics that was set up in a
dialogical way. The aim of this project was to develop and implement
normative guidelines with and within practice, in order to improve the
practice concerning coercion and compulsion in psychiatry.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www3.interscience.wiley.com.proxy.uchicago.edu/journal/118486360/home?CRETRY=1&amp;amp;SRETRY=0"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=422" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="practical wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/practical+wisdom/default.aspx" /><category term="ethics" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/ethics/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>The justificatory power of moral experience</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/04/16/the-justificatory-power-of-moral-experience.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/04/16/the-justificatory-power-of-moral-experience.aspx</id><published>2009-04-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-04-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by van Thiel, G. J. M. W., van Delden, J. J. M.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span class="FR_label"&gt;Abstract:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt; A recurrent issue in the vast
amount of literature on reasoning models in ethics is the role and
nature of moral intuitions. In this paper, we start from the view that
people who work and live in a certain moral practice usually possess
specific moral wisdom. If we manage to incorporate their moral
intuitions in ethical reasoning, we can arrive at judgements and
(modest) theories that grasp a moral experience that generally cannot
be found outside the practice.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Reflective equilibrium (RE) provides a
framework for balancing moral intuitions, ethical principles and
general theories. Nevertheless, persisting problems associated with the
use of intuitions need to be addressed. One is the objection that moral
intuitions lack the credibility necessary to guide moral reasoning.
Ethicists have tried to solve this problem by formulating criteria to
separate the &amp;quot;bad&amp;#39;&amp;#39; intuitions from the &amp;quot;good&amp;#39;&amp;#39; ones at the beginning
of the reasoning process. We call this the credible input-justified
outcome strategy. An example is the appeal to the common morality by
Beauchamp and Childress. We think this approach is unsuccessful. As an
alternative, we outline the good reasoning-justified outcome strategy.
It connects to a variant of RE in which intuitions from different
sources are incorporated. We argue that the elements of RE have
different levels of justificatory power at the start of reasoning. In
our strategy, each element can gain or lose justificatory power when it
is tested in a reasoning process that meets several criteria.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://ovidsp.tx.ovid.com.proxy.uchicago.edu/spa/ovidweb.cgi?QS2=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"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=423" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="ethics" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/ethics/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Questions of wisdom</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/04/01/questions-of-wisdom.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/04/01/questions-of-wisdom.aspx</id><published>2009-04-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-04-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;	Sandra Schmidt Bunkers, RN; PhD; FAAN &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span class="FR_label"&gt;Abstract:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt; In this column questions
concerning wisdom are addressed, such as, what is wisdom? Can wisdom be
taught in the academy? Several perspectives on wisdom from philosophy,
education, business, and psychology are presented. Wisdom with
creativity-creativity with wisdom is then explored through discussion
of Parse&amp;#39;s humanbecoming teaching-learning model and Laird Hamilton&amp;#39;s
life lessons learned from surfing, which he termed wisdom of the wave.
The column concludes with consideration of the wise person.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://nsq.sagepub.com/current.dtl"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=424" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="Education" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/Education/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Wisdom in Caring Research </title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/04/16/wisdom-in-caring-research.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/04/16/wisdom-in-caring-research.aspx</id><published>2009-04-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-04-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Marguerite J. Purnell, RN; PhD &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract: &lt;/b&gt;Light is the metaphor for wisdom; we seek and turn toward light as we seek and reach for wisdom, personally and professionally. The purpose of human life is, as Jung noted, kindling the light of meaning to illuminate the darkness. Nursing caring, focusing on the wholeness of persons regardless of life experiences, events, or circumstances, is intimately bound with wisdom, acquired both professionally and personally. In order to glean the wisdom reflected in current nursing research on caring, the author reviewed studies conducted from 2003 to 2008. Only a sampling of the 99 studies found are included here. Patients, students, nurse leaders, and administrators were asked what caring means and how it can be improved; ways to measure and evaluate caring were tested. This body of work can be used to enlighten nurses on the process of caring and how we teach our students to care.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://nsq.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/22/2/109"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=425" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>Wisdom principles as a meta-theoretical basis for evaluating leadership</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/04/16/wisdom-principles-as-a-meta-theoretical-basis-for-evaluating-leadership.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/04/16/wisdom-principles-as-a-meta-theoretical-basis-for-evaluating-leadership.aspx</id><published>2009-04-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-04-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;McKenna, Bernard, Rooney, David, Boal, Kimberley B&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;&lt;span class="FR_label"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract&lt;/b&gt;:&lt;/span&gt; This article responds to calls
in the management and leadership literature to articulate a role for
wisdom. While many talk about the role of wisdom, few people have
attempted to articulate what it consists of. We suggest five principles
that define wise leadership. We then position wisdom in a complex
world, both within the transformational, authentic and spiritual
leadership literature and the knowledge based view of organizations,
and suggest how leaders should be evaluated. Finally, we suggest the
need for future research directions and practical application.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the article from &lt;a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&amp;amp;_udi=B6W5N-4VM7YFV-3&amp;amp;_user=5745&amp;amp;_rdoc=1&amp;amp;_fmt=&amp;amp;_orig=search&amp;amp;_sort=d&amp;amp;view=c&amp;amp;_acct=C000001358&amp;amp;_version=1&amp;amp;_urlVersion=0&amp;amp;_userid=5745&amp;amp;md5=90dc0e6c83815edd7a1cce0314dfe0dc"&gt;Elsevier &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=426" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="leadership" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/leadership/default.aspx" /><category term="practical wisdom" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/practical+wisdom/default.aspx" /><category term="ethics" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/ethics/default.aspx" /><category term="knowledge" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/knowledge/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>The knowledge pyramid: a critique of the DIKW hierarchy</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/04/16/the-knowledge-pyramid-a-critique-of-the-dikw-hierarchy.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/04/16/the-knowledge-pyramid-a-critique-of-the-dikw-hierarchy.aspx</id><published>2009-04-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-04-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Martin Frické&amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="FR_label"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract&lt;/b&gt;:&lt;/span&gt; The paper evaluates the
data-information-knowledge-wisdom (DIKW) hierarchy. This hierarchy,
also known as the &amp;#39;knowledge hierarchy&amp;#39;, is part of the canon of
information science and management. Arguments are offered that the
hierarchy is unsound and methodologically undesirable. The paper
identifies a central logical error that DIKW makes. The paper also
identifies the dated and unsatisfactory philosophical positions of
operationalism and inductivism as the philosophical backdrop to the
hierarchy. The paper concludes with a sketch of some positive theories,
of value to information science, on the nature of the components of the
hierarchy: that data is anything recordable in a semantically and
pragmatically sound way, that information is what is known in other
literature as &amp;#39;weak knowledge&amp;#39;, that knowledge also is &amp;#39;weak knowledge&amp;#39;
and that wisdom is the possession and use, if required, of wide
practical knowledge, by an agent who appreciates the fallible nature of
that knowledge.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://dlist.sir.arizona.edu/2327/"&gt;article &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=427" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="knowledge" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/knowledge/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Knowledge, wisdom and intellectual leadership: a question of the future and knowledge-based sustainability</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/04/01/knowledge-wisdom-and-intellectual-leadership-a-question-of-the-future-and-knowledge-based-sustainability.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/04/01/knowledge-wisdom-and-intellectual-leadership-a-question-of-the-future-and-knowledge-based-sustainability.aspx</id><published>2009-04-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-04-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;
David Rooney, Bernard McKenna &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract: &lt;/b&gt;
Important aspects of knowledge that are underresearched include
links between knowledge, wisdom and leadership. This represents a
research lacuna, which, if addressed, can help leaders develop
knowledge-based strategies for future sustainability. Using a wisdom
perspective enables the best, most strategic and ethical use of
knowledge. By integrating knowledge and wisdom theory with strategic
leadership theory, we define what wise intellectual leadership for a
sustainable, knowledge-based future is. More specifically, we argue
that strategic leaders should provide intellectual leadership for a
sustainable future as an explicit part of a knowledge management
strategy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the&lt;a href="http://www.inderscience.com/search/index.php?action=record&amp;amp;rec_id=21720&amp;amp;prevQuery=&amp;amp;ps=10&amp;amp;m=or"&gt; article &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=430" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="ethics" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/ethics/default.aspx" /><category term="knowledge" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/knowledge/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Introductory: The Global Potential of Pragmatism</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/04/20/introductory-the-global-potential-of-pragmatism.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/04/20/introductory-the-global-potential-of-pragmatism.aspx</id><published>2009-04-01T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-04-01T05:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;EMIL VIŠŇOVSKÝ &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;From among the many philosophies that have ever existed, the best versions may be &lt;br /&gt;considered the philosophies that exert their effect on human conduct. Philosophy for the sake &lt;br /&gt;of philosophy itself may be edifying and sublime, like the highest of the arts, but if philosophy &lt;br /&gt;does not move us toward ameliorative action in order to become better human beings who make &lt;br /&gt;their world better, it ends up as a luxurious “language game” or “intellectual gymnastics” that &lt;br /&gt;we can no longer afford. Of course, action without wisdom is stupid, even disastrous. If the &lt;br /&gt;mission of philosophy is to bring wisdom into action, and if there is any wisdom in philosophy &lt;br /&gt;at all, this wisdom will be active and it will teach us how to live and how to act...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://versita.metapress.com/content/80k2trp84w3622u7/?p=ed699d9743c548bfa6b2dcfb8205b70d&amp;amp;pi=0"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=433" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="PHILOSOPHY" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/PHILOSOPHY/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Renewal Coaching: Sustainable change for individuals and organizations</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/18/renewal-coaching-sustainable-change-for-individuals-and-organizations.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2010/01/18/renewal-coaching-sustainable-change-for-individuals-and-organizations.aspx</id><published>2009-03-01T07:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-03-01T07:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=765" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>elleallison@mac.com</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/elleallison_4000_mac.com.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>Spontaneous planning for future stone throwing by a male chimpanzee</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/04/20/spontaneous-planning-for-future-stone-throwing-by-a-male-chimpanzee.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/04/20/spontaneous-planning-for-future-stone-throwing-by-a-male-chimpanzee.aspx</id><published>2009-03-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-03-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;b&gt;Abstract:&lt;/b&gt; Planning for a future, rather than a current, mental state is a
cognitive process generally viewed as uniquely human. Here, however, I
shall report on a decade of observations of spontaneous planning by a
male chimpanzee in a zoo. The planning actions, which took place in a
calm state, included stone caching and the manufacture of discs from
concrete, objects later used as missiles against zoo visitors during
agitated chimpanzee dominance displays. Such planning implies advanced
consciousness and cognition traditionally not associated with nonhuman
animals [&lt;a href="http://www.cell.com/current-biology/abstract/S0960-9822%2809%2900547-8#bib1" title="back-bib1" class="" name="back-bib1"&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;].
Spontaneous and unambiguous planning behaviours for future states by
non-humans have not previously been reported, and anecdotal reports,
describing single occasions, are exceptionally scarce [&lt;a href="http://www.cell.com/current-biology/abstract/S0960-9822%2809%2900547-8#bib2" title="back-bib2" class="" name="back-bib2"&gt;2&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href="http://www.cell.com/current-biology/abstract/S0960-9822%2809%2900547-8#bib3" title="back-bib3" class="" name="back-bib3"&gt;3&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href="http://www.cell.com/current-biology/abstract/S0960-9822%2809%2900547-8#bib4" title="back-bib4" class="" name="back-bib4"&gt;4&lt;/a&gt;]. This dearth of observations is arguably the main reason for not ascribing cognitive foresight to nonhuman animals [&lt;a href="http://www.cell.com/current-biology/abstract/S0960-9822%2809%2900547-8#bib1" title="back-bib1" class="" name="back-bib1"&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;].
To date, the surprisingly few controlled demonstrations of planning for
future states by animals are experimentally induced behaviours in great
apes [&lt;a href="http://www.cell.com/current-biology/abstract/S0960-9822%2809%2900547-8#bib5" title="back-bib5" class="" name="back-bib5"&gt;5&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href="http://www.cell.com/current-biology/abstract/S0960-9822%2809%2900547-8#bib6" title="back-bib6" class="" name="back-bib6"&gt;6&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href="http://www.cell.com/current-biology/abstract/S0960-9822%2809%2900547-8#bib7" title="back-bib7" class="" name="back-bib7"&gt;7&lt;/a&gt;] and corvids [&lt;a href="http://www.cell.com/current-biology/abstract/S0960-9822%2809%2900547-8#bib8" title="back-bib8" class="" name="back-bib8"&gt;8&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href="http://www.cell.com/current-biology/abstract/S0960-9822%2809%2900547-8#bib9" title="back-bib9" class="" name="back-bib9"&gt;9&lt;/a&gt;].
The observational findings in this report suggest that these laboratory
results are not experimental artefacts, at least in the case of great
apes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Source: &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.cell.com/current-biology/abstract/S0960-9822%2809%2900547-8" target="_blank"&gt;Current Biology&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=434" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>admin</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/admin.aspx</uri></author><category term="cognition" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/cognition/default.aspx" /><category term="biological sciences" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/biological+sciences/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Science and the Pursuit of Wisdom: Studies in the Philosophy of Nicholas Maxwell</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/03/01/science-and-the-pursuit-of-wisdom-studies-in-the-philosophy-of-nicholas-maxwell.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/03/01/science-and-the-pursuit-of-wisdom-studies-in-the-philosophy-of-nicholas-maxwell.aspx</id><published>2009-03-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-03-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;by &lt;span class="addmd"&gt;Leemon McHenry (Ed.)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Nicholas Maxwell&amp;#39;s provocative and highly-original philosophy of
science urges a revolution in academic inquiry affecting all branches
of learning, so that the single-minded pursuit of knowledge is replaced
with the aim of helping people realise what is of value in life and
make progress toward a more civilised world. This volume of essays from
an international, interdisciplinary group of scholars engages Maxwell
in critical evaluation and celebrates his contribution to philosophy
spanning forty years. Several of the contributors, like Maxwell, took
their inspiration from Sir Karl Popper&amp;#39;s philosophy of science and were
connected to the department he created at the London School of
Economics. In the introductory chapter, Maxwell provides an overview of
his thought and then defends his views against objections in a
concluding essay.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;See it on &lt;a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=vakRR-0psREC"&gt;Google Books &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Link to the &lt;a href="http://www.ontos-verlag.de/"&gt;Publisher &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=345" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>The Wisdom to Doubt: A Justification of Religious Skepticism</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/03/17/the-wisdom-to-doubt-a-justification-of-religious-skepticism.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/03/17/the-wisdom-to-doubt-a-justification-of-religious-skepticism.aspx</id><published>2009-03-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-03-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;A recently published review of J.L. Schellenberg&amp;#39;s 2007 &amp;quot;The Wisdom to Doubt: A Justification of Religious Skepticism,&amp;quot; Cornell University Press, 2007 by Jack Macintosh.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://journals.cambridge.org/production/action/cjoGetFulltext?fulltextid=3787108"&gt;Read the review &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=347" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="religion" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/religion/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Conceptions of Wisdom</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/03/01/conceptions-of-wisdom.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/03/01/conceptions-of-wisdom.aspx</id><published>2009-03-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-03-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span class="FR_label"&gt;Abstract:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt; This article reports
exploratory research on the meanings associated with the concept of
wisdom by two groups of intending information professionals. Concern
for the limited success of knowledge management initiatives and the
complexity and hyperturbulence of organizational environments has
provoked discussion of the role of wisdom in organizations, management,
leadership, and decision making. A literature review provides a
distillation of the literature on the notion of wisdom as a foundation
for investigating the alignment between these perspectives and those of
the respondents. Data was collected through a survey using one open
question. The findings of the content analysis of the responses are
reported and discussed. It is evident that wisdom is a polysemantic
concept, but that there is some level of agreement that knowledge,
experience and action are key aspects of wisdom; but there is very
little allusion to possible ethical and spiritual dimensions of wisdom.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://jis.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/1/110"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=356" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>The role of overall justice judgments in organizational justice research</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/03/01/the-role-of-overall-justice-judgments-in-organizational-justice-research-a-test-of-mediation.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/03/01/the-role-of-overall-justice-judgments-in-organizational-justice-research-a-test-of-mediation.aspx</id><published>2009-03-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-03-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;quot;Organizational justice research traditionally focuses on the unique
predictability of different types of justice (distributive, procedural,
and interactional) and the relative importance of these types of
justice on outcome variables. Recently, researchers have suggested
shifting from this focus on specific types of justice to a
consideration of overall justice. The authors hypothesize that overall
justice judgments mediate the relationship between specific justice
facets and outcomes. They present 2 studies to test this hypothesis.
Study 1 demonstrates that overall justice judgments mediate the
relationship between specific justice judgments and employee attitudes.
Study 2 demonstrates the mediating relationship holds for supervisor
ratings of employee behavior. Implications for research on
organizational justice are discussed.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div id="rdcAuthors"&gt;
				
				
					
					
						
						
						 
						&lt;span class="rdLinkItem"&gt;&lt;a href="http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=search.searchResults&amp;amp;latSearchType=a&amp;amp;term=Ambrose,%20Maureen%20L."&gt;Ambrose, Maureen L.&lt;/a&gt;;&lt;/span&gt;
					
						
						
						 
						&lt;span class="rdLinkItem"&gt;&lt;a href="http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=search.searchResults&amp;amp;latSearchType=a&amp;amp;term=Schminke,%20Marshall"&gt;Schminke, Marshall&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
					
				
			&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=369" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Adaptive variation in judgment and philosophical intuition</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/06/01/adaptive-variation-in-judgment-and-philosophical-intuition.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/06/01/adaptive-variation-in-judgment-and-philosophical-intuition.aspx</id><published>2009-03-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-03-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Our theoretical understanding of individual differences can be used as
a tool to test and refine theory. Individual differences are useful
because judgments, including philosophically relevant intuitions, are
the predictable products of the fit between adaptive psychological
mechanisms (e.g., heuristics, traits, skills, capacities) and task
constraints. As an illustration of this method and its potential
implications, our target article used a canonical, representative, and
affectively charged judgment task to reveal a relationship between the
heritable personality trait extraversion and some compatabilist
judgments. In the current Reply, we further clarify major theoretical
implications of these data and outline potential opportunities and
obstacles for this methodology. Discussion focuses on (1) the need for
theoretically grounded a priori predictions; (2) the use of precise
process level data and theory; (3) the possibility of convergent
validity as personality is known to predict life experiences and
outcomes; and (4) the fundamentally adaptive nature of cognition&lt;b&gt;.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Edward T. Cokely and Adam Feltz &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read &lt;a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&amp;amp;_udi=B6WD0-4VKMW6J-1&amp;amp;_user=5745&amp;amp;_origUdi=B6WD0-4TGGCRP-1&amp;amp;_fmt=high&amp;amp;_coverDate=03%2F31%2F2009&amp;amp;_rdoc=1&amp;amp;_orig=article&amp;amp;_acct=C000001358&amp;amp;_version=1&amp;amp;_urlVersion=0&amp;amp;_userid=5745&amp;amp;md5=acfbbe6205b2c08e7756cdf6d4a1f15b"&gt;the article&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=464" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /><category term="PHILOSOPHY" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/PHILOSOPHY/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Neuroethics as a Brain-Based Philosophy of Life: The Case of Michael S. Gazzaniga </title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/03/01/neuroethics-as-a-brain-based-philosophy-of-life-the-case-of-michael-s-gazzaniga.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/03/01/neuroethics-as-a-brain-based-philosophy-of-life-the-case-of-michael-s-gazzaniga.aspx</id><published>2009-03-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-03-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;quot;Michael S. Gazzaniga, a pioneer and world leader in cognitive
neuroscience, has made an initial attempt to develop neuroethics into a
brain-based philosophy of life that he hopes will replace the
irrational religious and political belief-systems that still partly
govern modern societies. This article critically examines Gazzaniga’s
proposal and shows that his actual moral arguments have little to do
with neuroscience. Instead, they are based on unexamined political,
cultural and moral conceptions, narratives and values. A more promising
way of interpreting the belief-forming system of the brain is to say
that we cannot avoid thinking in terms of wider frameworks and
narratives that are socially embedded and historically developed;
consequently, any moral discussion has to be in terms of these
frameworks and narratives...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;by Arne Rasmusson &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://www.springerlink.com/content/l0754441q412r631/?p=3da8ba488f234f859816d0156842b3a8&amp;amp;pi=1"&gt;article &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Photo by &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/onkel_wart/"&gt;Thomas Lieser &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=378" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="PHILOSOPHY" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/PHILOSOPHY/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Political grandstanding and the use of proverbs in African political discourse</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/02/01/political-grandstanding-and-the-use-of-proverbs-in-african-political-discourse.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/02/01/political-grandstanding-and-the-use-of-proverbs-in-african-political-discourse.aspx</id><published>2009-02-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-02-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Daniel Ochieng Orwenjo &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In Africa, the transmission of the overwhelming complexity of&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;the people&amp;#39;s day-to-day experiences are deeply rooted in the&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;continent&amp;#39;s rich cultural artistry. Proverbs are the most widely&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;and commonly used in the continent&amp;#39;s long standing history of&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;oral arts. Proverbs are regarded as repositories of the people&amp;#39;s&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;collective social, political and cultural wisdom and as analytic&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;tools of thought. This paper analyses how different Kenyan politicians&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;and political parties used proverbs to strengthen and further&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;their respective political positions with regard to the then&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;proposed new constitution of Kenya, during the various countrywide&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;campaigns in public political rallies and through the media.&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;More specifically, the paper looks at how politicians and political&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;parties used proverbs to further their different ideologies, to woo potential voters and to discredit opposing views.

&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://das.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/20/1/123"&gt;Read the article &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=333" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>The uncertain reasoner: Bayes, logic, and rationality</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/02/01/the-uncertain-reasoner-bayes-logic-and-rationality.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/02/01/the-uncertain-reasoner-bayes-logic-and-rationality.aspx</id><published>2009-02-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-02-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span class="FR_label"&gt;Abstract:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt; Human cognition requires coping
with a complex and uncertain world. This suggests that dealing with
uncertainty may be the central challenge for human reasoning. In
Bayesian Rationality we argue that probability theory, the calculus of
uncertainty, is the right framework in which to understand everyday
reasoning. We also argue that probability theory explains behavior,
even on experimental tasks that have been designed to probe people&amp;#39;s
logical reasoning abilities. Most commentators agree on the centrality
of uncertainty; some suggest that there is a residual role for logic in
understanding reasoning; and others put forward alternative formalisms
for uncertain reasoning, or raise specific technical, methodological,
or empirical challenges. In responding to these points, we aim to
clarify the scope and limits of probability and logic in cognitive
science; explore the meaning of the &amp;quot;rational&amp;quot; explanation of
cognition; and re-evaluate the empirical case for Bayesian rationality.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Read the &lt;a href="http://journals.cambridge.org/production/action/cjoGetFulltext?fulltextid=3921260"&gt;article &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=359" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="decision making" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/decision+making/default.aspx" /><category term="cognition" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/cognition/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Professional supervision: trusting the wisdom that 'comes'</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/02/01/professional-supervision-trusting-the-wisdom-that-comes.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/02/01/professional-supervision-trusting-the-wisdom-that-comes.aspx</id><published>2009-02-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-02-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;
Elizabeth Ann Smythe,&amp;nbsp;
Tony MacCulloch, Richard Charmley&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The lived experience of professional supervision is complex and
dynamic. Techne, the knowledge that informs the &amp;#39;know-how&amp;#39; of practice,
offers guidance. Phronesis, the dynamic wisdom that trusts the &amp;#39;play&amp;#39;
of relationship in the supervision encounter, recognises the spirit of
the encounter. While it is hard to capture that which is uniquely in
the moment, this paper argues for an opening of the space that allows
the phronesis of practice to be revealed. The notion of &amp;#39;play&amp;#39; is
explored, recognising supervision arises from the interaction between
both parties. To yield effective supervision, play must be rooted in
integrity, played out in a safe supportive environment, and underpinned
by humility and courage. How the supervisor listens determines what the
speaker will say. Unless a listening space is opened there is only
empty talk. To embrace the phronesis of practice is to gift the
supervision encounter with a rich wisdom that is beyond the scope of
mere techne. One must also acknowledge however that this safest-of-all
mode of practice paradoxically exposes the supervisor to vulnerability
from a public scrutiny that seeks pre-defined ways. Techne has the
certainty of the nod of approval while phronesis trusts in its own
instinctual wisdom that can seldom be adequately explained. Yet, it is
phronesis that makes the difference.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content%7Econtent=a908448585%7Edb=all%7Ejumptype=rss"&gt;Read the article &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=329" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>The Wisdom of Many in One Mind: Improving Individual Judgments With Dialectical Bootstrapping</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/02/01/the-wisdom-of-many-in-one-mind-improving-individual-judgments-with-dialectical-bootstrapping.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/02/01/the-wisdom-of-many-in-one-mind-improving-individual-judgments-with-dialectical-bootstrapping.aspx</id><published>2009-02-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-02-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;/b&gt;Herzog, Stefan M., Hertwig, Ralph &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The “wisdom of crowds” in making judgments about the future or other
unknown events is well established. The average quantitative estimate
of a group of individuals is consistently more accurate than the
typical estimate, and is sometimes even the best estimate. Although
individuals&amp;#39; estimates may be riddled with errors, averaging them
boosts accuracy because both systematic and random errors tend to
cancel out across individuals. We propose exploiting the power of
averaging to improve estimates generated by a single person by using an
approach we call &lt;i&gt;dialectical bootstrapping&lt;/i&gt;. Specifically, it
should be possible to reduce a person&amp;#39;s error by averaging his or her
first estimate with a second one that harks back to somewhat different
knowledge. We derive conditions under which dialectical bootstrapping
fosters accuracy and provide an empirical demonstration that its
benefits go beyond reliability gains. A single mind can thus simulate
the wisdom of many.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/bpl/psci/2009/00000020/00000002/art00017"&gt;Read this article &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Photo by &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/71502646@N00/2601925124/"&gt;EarlWorld &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=330" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</name><uri>http://wisdomresearch.org/members/wattawa.aspx</uri></author><category term="psychology" scheme="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/tags/psychology/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Teaching Wisdom to Interest: Book Five of Plato's Republic</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/02/01/teaching-wisdom-to-interest-book-five-of-plato-s-republic.aspx" /><id>http://wisdomresearch.org/blogs/publications/archive/2009/02/01/teaching-wisdom-to-interest-book-five-of-plato-s-republic.aspx</id><published>2009-02-01T06:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-02-01T06:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="contrib"&gt;Timothy J. Lukes&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="contrib"&gt; and &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="contrib"&gt;Mary F. Scudder&lt;/span&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We suggest that Book Five of the &lt;i&gt;Republic&lt;/i&gt;, where Plato
discusses the status of women in the guardian class, is a superb source
of Platonic insight. For it is precisely the discussion of women that
is most vulnerable to co-optation by the modern vernacular of interest,
a vernacular to which the &lt;i&gt;Republic&lt;/i&gt; is vehemently opposed. If
students come to appreciate an alternative perspective regarding this
most sensitive of modern issues, the full impact of the Socratic
approach is available to them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&amp;amp;aid=3260732"&gt;Read the article &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wisdomresearch.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=331" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>wattawa</